discokermit
Well-Known Member
rausing never invented the tetrapak anyway, erik wallenberg, an employee, did. he didn't get any millions. his grandchildren aren't living a life of idleness.
I do differentiate between addicts. I have great sympathy for those who turn to drugs, and ruin their lives with them, because of shit in their life. For mega-rich playboys and girls? I have no sympathy at all.
Addiction like mental health problems is no respecter of class. What about very wealthy people who have mental health problems? Do they deserve to die and have their corpse left to rot as well?
Also whats all this shite about them not working, if you dont need to work why the fuck would you? Theres no pride in working, its a mugs game.
Probably not - depending upon what they have done with their lives.Addiction like mental health problems is no respecter of class. What about very wealthy people who have mental health problems? Do they deserve to die and have their corpse left to rot as well?
gets worser and worserrausing never invented the tetrapak anyway, erik wallenberg, an employee, did. he didn't get any millions. his grandchildren aren't living a life of idleness.
Could turn that around very easily and take the same attitude to people on the dole, who are actually capable of working.
Which, even by the DWP's somewhat broad definition of "capable of working", is around 100,000 people.
That's out of some 3 million on some form of JSA, plus another 2 million on disability/ill-health benefits.
So, "turn that around" if you like, but it doesn't really play well, does it?
What's the current limit for inheriting tax free? £320k? £325k? I'm assuming it must have been debated and set at some point? It can't be random. You've come in at £2k as acceptable. You must see why someone might ask why you chose that example?
Probably not - depending upon what they have done with their lives.
What about simply battled with their condition? Is that enough or is it the abandoned rotting corpse fate for them?
What I'm getting at here is every so often we have a thread about some wealthy twat who has made some statement like 'bring back the workhouse' or something and we all line-up to call him/ her a cunt. Yet it seems you are the other side of that coin, all we really know about this woman is she was wealthy and a drug addict but apparently that is enough to celebrate her death and revel in the unpleasantness of her demise.
Its pretty grubby stuff really.
Its not about the raw numbers, its about the principle and attitude.
i.e you cunts are as a bad as any tory.
as said repeatedly - this one isn't merely wealthy, she was the very top of the tree. the epitome of all that is wrong with capitalism. that she died in a fitting manner is no reason to be at all sorry for herWhat about simply battled with their condition? Is that enough or is it the abandoned rotting corpse fate for them?
What I'm getting at here is every so often we have a thread about some wealthy twat who has made some statement like 'bring back the workhouse' or something and we all line-up to call him/ her a cunt. Yet it seems you are the other side of that coin, all we really know about this woman is she was wealthy and a drug addict but apparently that is enough to celebrate her death and revel in the unpleasantness of her demise.
Its pretty grubby stuff really.
What principles? Which attitudes?
What principles? Which attitudes?
So you're counting me in with the 100,000, are you?
as said repeatedly - this one isn't merely wealthy, she was the very top of the tree. the epitome of all that is wrong with capitalism. that she died in a fitting manner is no reason to be at all sorry for her
Addiction like mental health problems is no respecter of class. What about very wealthy people who have mental health problems? Do they deserve to die and have their corpse left to rot as well?
Well done at completely failing at reading comprehension once again, are you and blagsta study buddies by any chance?
I'm bored though and its an hour until the weekend starts so I'll spoon-feed you. So many here fail to see the complete hypocrisy as they gleefully engage in the same hatred and venom towards others that they claim to despise so much in conservative right wingers.
Its nearly as comical as reading a few books and determining yourself to be an expert on the subject
On of the many manifestations of the wholesale hypocrisy that the regulars engage in on urban.
If there are many, you won't mind providing some examples, will you?
&, to repeat (from a comment to someone else), yes, 'haha' may have been a tad OTT, but I am entirely unsympathetic to the manner of her demiseFor sure, I'm not sorry for her. But there is a world of difference between indifference to her death and taking pleasure in it. You very much seem to be doing the latter.
In general terms, instead of mourning a lost life, people honing in what a life was in monetary terms?
After 73k posts if you havnt seen them, you never will, regardless of how they are presented.
As I argued earlier, the wealthy at least have the means to access the very best treatment, if they wish. The poor have to take what they're given.
For sure, I'm not sorry for her. But there is a world of difference between indifference to her death and taking pleasure in it. You very much seem to be doing the latter.
No. Good is it? What relevance does it have to your assertion that how you earn your money is nobody'a business but yours?Have you read the Action on Addiction piece?
We don't know why Rausing died, but we do know that despite her wealth, whatever help she was able to access, didn't apparently have any impact, which slightly negates any argument that access to treatment because of access to funds doesn't mean it will be successful..
&, to repeat (from a comment to someone else), yes, 'haha' may have been a tad OTT, but I am entirely unsympathetic to the manner of her demise
As I argued earlier, the wealthy at least have the means to access the very best treatment, if they wish. The poor have to take what they're given.
No. Good is it? What relevance does it have to your assertion that how you earn your money is nobody'a business but yours?