ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
dwyer already done this one pages ago, you dick.
TBF, grit is pretty much a dwyer-come-lately kind of poster, although without the occasional interesting posts.
dwyer already done this one pages ago, you dick.
dwyer is a hundred times better than grit. and dwyer's a cunt.TBF, grit is pretty much a dwyer-come-lately kind of poster, although without the occasional interesting posts.
dwyer is a hundred times better than grit. and dwyer's a cunt.
Unlikely to happen these days in the UK - patent law has been recently been changed to give employees like Wallenberg better financial compensation if the company makes squillions from their invention.rausing never invented the tetrapak anyway, erik wallenberg, an employee, did. he didn't get any millions. his grandchildren aren't living a life of idleness.
Hmmm, I doubt it tbh. There's a strong link between trauma, stress, lack of social networks and psychosis. More common in urban areas than rural, too.I wouldn't mind betting there's a link between psychosis and wealth too. The wealthy psychotics are probably less likely to end up in the statistics.
Doesn't matter when you're talking about individuals, though. That the poor and disadvantaged are more likely to suffer psychosis is of no comfort to a rich person who suffers psychosis. Same goes for these two - who by all accounts appear to have led a pretty squalid, pointless, empty kind of life. When talking in terms of trends in a population, issues such as addiction and mental illness have class components, but you can't talk in those terms when you're looking at an individual case. Who knows what led them to end up like this? But whatever it is will be peculiar to them.Hmmm, I doubt it tbh. There's a strong link between trauma, stress, lack of social networks and psychosis. More common in urban areas than rural, too.
I'm neither angry or bitter. I'm not, to put it bluntly, "emotionally incontinent". That doesn't mean I'm unemotional, or "angry and bitter", it means that I don't feel the need to "follow the pack" in conspicuous emotionalism.
I wasn't looking at an individual case.Doesn't matter when you're talking about individuals, though. That the poor and disadvantaged are more likely to suffer psychosis is of no comfort to a rich person who suffers psychosis. Same goes for these two - who by all accounts appear to have led a pretty squalid, pointless, empty kind of life. When talking in terms of trends in a population, issues such as addiction and mental illness have class components, but you can't talk in those terms when you're looking at an individual case. Who knows what led them to end up like this? But whatever it is will be peculiar to them.
Finally gone round the twist I see.
Fair enough. Your post was a reply to a reply to a post that was - hence the confusion perhaps.I wasn't looking at an individual case.
Was it? Oh.Fair enough. Your post was a reply to a reply to a post that was - hence the confusion perhaps.
I don't see anyone celebrating, just indifference really.
Oh ffs just shut the fuck up you mental fucks, two rich drug addicts dying is not something to be celebrated, especially not the fact one wasn't found for a week.
That is a bit grim, tbfYeah 15 pages of indifference.
Maybe you should check belboid's posts taking pleasure in the fact the woman's body was left to rot for a week before it was found.
oh christ. you say his name and he appears.Finally gone round the twist I see.
No there wasn't.Being serious for a second, there was a time when this would have been utterly obvious, even to the most bitter and hardened of cynics. Not that long ago either. Something is going drastically wrong with the human mind, quite rapidly.
Vanity searchoh christ. you say his name and he appears.
Oh ffs just shut the fuck up you mental fucks, two rich drug addicts dying is not something to be celebrated, especially not the fact one wasn't found for a week. The subsequent tangents thrown up by various idiots to justify their pathetic glee or moralising only proves that they are as intellectually stunted as they are ethically.
No there wasn't.
Oh ffs just shut the fuck up you mental fucks, two rich drug addicts dying is not something to be celebrated <snip>
Nah. We just didn't have the internet 60 years ago.Sure there was. Say, 40 or 50 or certainly 60 years ago, no-one outside an asylum would have spoken as Belboid has done here. Not even about their worst enemy. Not even about Hitler. It's true, just a glance at the literature of the past will prove it. People had more dignity, more self-respect, more taste.
Something strange has happened to us, that we seem to throw up Belboids quite regularly now. Half the time we don't even notice that they're sick.
Nah. We just didn't have the internet 60 years ago.
There does seem to be a shortage of empathy these days, maybe the internet's partially responsible? Fuck knows. Urban is fairly sensible in comparison with a lot of sites, though. Belboid wouldn't even stand out on, say, the manchester evg news comments bit - That's just awash with foaming gibberers. Though maybe the gibberers have always been quietly a-foaming in the privacy of their own homes and the net's just made them more visible? I remember an interview with Jonathan Coe in the mid 90's, well before the net became ubiquitious, and in it, he was saying that as a writer, he recieved a lot of correspondance and the nature of much of that correspondance led him to the conclusion that low level mental illness was/is far more prevelent than most people would imagine. With crackpots like belboid being given the time of day, who could argue with that?
Oh ffs just shut the fuck up you mental fucks, two rich drug addicts dying is not something to be celebrated, especially not the fact one wasn't found for a week. The subsequent tangents thrown up by various idiots to justify their pathetic glee or moralising only proves that they are as intellectually stunted as they are ethically.
Aye. The internet has both revealed just how many nutters there are (check any newspaper comments page, YouTube comments etc etc), and also caused nutters to proliferate even further--partly by giving easy access to nutty ideas, and partly by showing them that they are strong in numbers and thus encouraging them to think they are normal.
But it's more than the internet though. Something about society is driving people to become nutters and addicts of one kind or another, and it's happening very quickly too. Most probably unbridled capitalism.