Probably undetected.How many suicides by drowning occur by someone inhaling a bucket-full of water? Given such quantities of water are more readily available than deep bodies of water, you'd think it would be commonplace.
how insensitive? i was actually thinking of a documentary i had seen featuring an elderly gentleman who had lost a relative in a tower block collapse.Through his tears he said "we were the lucky ones you know because at least we had a body".
Look. I know what am talking about where suicide is concerned,, and I therefore know that kabbes knows what he's talking about. Yet you've simply defied his attempts to introduce a bit of knowledge and nuance into a discussion around suicide issues, and doubled down with clodhopping, ignorant responses to someone else talking about suicide.how insensitive? i was actually thinking of a documentary i had seen featuring an elderly gentleman who had lost a relative in a tower block collapse.Through his tears he said "we were the lucky ones you know because at least we had a body".
Welcome backI wouldn't mind a hermitage on Athos (the monastic community, not the poster). Admittedly the religion is a bit of an issue, but reckon I could fake it.
Absolutely no fucking idea whatsoever what the police think they've achieved by stating NB had alcohol problems and concerns regarding early menopause.
A shit-fisted attempt to deflect attention from their own incompetence perhaps. It seems to have worked though as most of the speculation is now about suicide, including on this thread.
actually, they did say she was vulnerable at the beginning, just very vaguely so it didn't garner much attention.The police released too little info to start with, and too much info yesterday.
If they'd just said she was vulnerable at the beginning, it wouldn't all have kicked off.
The police released too little info to start with, and too much info yesterday.
If they'd just said she was vulnerable to start with, it wouldn't all have kicked off.
Did the police know about her issues to begin with or did her friends and family tell the much later?
actually, they did say she was vulnerable at the beginning, just very vaguely so it didn't garner much attention.
actually, they did say she was vulnerable at the beginning, just very vaguely so it didn't garner much attention.
Ah ok I thought the police were told later about her problems, if so why did the police realise this info in the first placeProbably right....and doing so now really isnt helpful to anyone. Bar the police.
They apparently knew because they had sent a police car and carr team to the house in mid January to the house after a call to them.
Good question.Ah ok I thought the police were told later about her problems, if so why did the police realise this info in the first place
both are plausible, shedloads of people are officially 'vulnerable' - it doesn't necessarily mean they aren't basically okay. It could just be there on one of various medications.Did they? I didn't read that anywhere. Everything said about her was that she was in good spirits and planning play dates for her children.
It's also fucking rotten of the police to discuss her menopause.
Ah ok I thought the police were told later about her problems, if so why did the police realise this info in the first place
Completely unnecessary but allows them to hide any future discoveries and associated failures on their part behind a crazy irrational woman narrative.
Did they? I didn't read that anywhere. Everything said about her was that she was in good spirits and planning play dates for her children.
It's also fucking rotten of the police to discuss her menopause.
Ditto. This is key, isn’t it.When these details were announced, I assumed* the family must have given permission for them to be released, but it's now being reported that the police told the family they would be making this public, rather than seeking consent.
* rather naively, I admit
When these details were announced, I assumed* the family must have given permission for them to be released, but it's now being reported that the police told the family they would be making this public, rather than seeking consent.
* rather naively, I admit
Why? Should it only be spoken of in hushed tones in private, or just swept under the 'mental health' umbrella?
TBH I expect some of the reason for announcing what they did is to try and slow the absolute shitty loon speculation on the internet by giving some background to why they think no third party involvement is the most likely outcome.
i don't think they are, they're acting for themselves to try to extricate themselves from the hole they're in on this one. and only digging themselves deeperThe police are acting on behalf of the missing person really, not the family.