Serge Forward
Just enjoyin' my coffee.
Because it's a friend dropping in?I don't think the Guardian has ever been the most popular newspaper website - at least not in recent years.
Because it's a friend dropping in?I don't think the Guardian has ever been the most popular newspaper website - at least not in recent years.
I've literally no idea what you mean here, sorry.Because it's a friend dropping in?
I think you should say what you mean for once.Filth right wing nonce cunt.
I know, I keep beating around the bush.I think you should say what you mean for once.
Bolded bit : That's insanely! out of order. Apologise, please.Why bother trying to make the distinction on a thread exposing someone as a sex pest? You don't want the sex pest associated with your beloved newspaper? Hard luck there - it's a distinction your beloved newspaper is very happy to blur so they can have content on Sundays and more readers for their sister newspaper's articles.
I had never previously met any of the women who contacted me. They were motivated to get in touch by their experience that GNM cannot be trusted to investigate complaints and/or has actively sought to discourage them. And they want things to be better.
Before tweeting, I also reached out to a board member of the Scott Trust - which owns GNM - but received no reply.
W3, who had worked in other newsrooms at other major national newspapers, spoke of how, before she had joined the Guardian she had been warned about the culture but GNM was far worse than she had expected or experienced elsewhere.
Another woman, W4, explained how, as a work experience student, she was asked to pose for pornographic photographs by a staff photographer. What she described was a highly developed modus operandi - by a man who showed her pornographic photos he had taken of other young women.
W5 told me of how she had experienced bullying by a named senior executive. The name she gave me was the name of the same “senior executive” (see above) who W2 considered had also discouraged her from bringing a complaint.
Because it's full of clickbait, lots of 'news' about Corrie cast members and other slebs, including reality TV 'stars,' footballers and their WAGs, plus random articles from elsewhere in the country of the 'angry people in local newspaper' about neighbour disputes, people doing idiotic things, consumer stuff, etc.Why is the Manchester Evening News read more than loads of national titles though??
Because it's full of clickbait, lots of 'news' about Corrie cast members and other slebs, including reality TV 'stars,' footballers and their WAGs, plus random articles from elsewhere in the country of the 'angry people in local newspaper' about neighbour disputes, people doing idiotic things, consumer stuff, etc.
Plus, speaking of footballers, two of the countries biggest and most well-known and well-supported clubs in the country are in Manchester, so their sports coverage will generate lots of traffic.
A lot of what they publish isn't local Manchester news, so it gains a wider audience, although they do cover local stuff across Greater Manchester, which has a large population, including culture and entertainment, so What's On stuff, plus more general arts and culture, concerts, restaurants, etc.
The MEN website is a totally different beast to what MEN newspaper used to be.
For a "local" paper the MEN wasn't totally shite several decades ago. It was also associated with the Guardian (at least, it was in the same building at the end of Deansgate). Recent editions I've seen have been dire, and the website is even worse and impossible to navigate through the pop up shite. The content is as AnnO'Neemus describes.
A weekly newspaper dubbed “Britain’s biggest” at the time of its launch is closing for good after seven years in print.
Reach plc has announced the closure of the Manchester Weekly News in a move that will also see it cease free distribution of the Manchester Evening News from the middle of August.
The company has made the decision, which it calls a “pivotal moment”, on the grounds that it can now reach potential customers for its advertisers at a greater scale digitally than through free print products.
All local newspaper websites do this thoughBecause it's full of clickbait, lots of 'news' about Corrie cast members and other slebs, including reality TV 'stars,' footballers and their WAGs, plus random articles from elsewhere in the country of the 'angry people in local newspaper' about neighbour disputes, people doing idiotic things, consumer stuff, etc.
All local newspaper websites do this though
If it's because they're part of the Reach group, why isn't the Liverpool Echo, the Bristol Post and the Staines Informer not doing the same numbers as national titles too?They don't, mine certainly doesn't, some do to a degree, but Reach is the worst for it, as they have created loads of clickbait stories for their three national tabloid titles, so there's little cost involved in sharing them across the group's regional & local sites. For other groups, or independents, it would cost a lot to commission such content, or buy it in from news agencies, it's not worth doing.
If it's because they're part of the Reach group, why isn't the Liverpool Echo, the Bristol Post and the Staines Informer not doing the same numbers as national titles too?
This is bloody awful.