Callie
Pivoting
Or they'll just make sure they attack when noone else it present.It might make him think twice before doing it again though.
Or they'll just make sure they attack when noone else it present.It might make him think twice before doing it again though.
The advice was given in the late 1950s, and should be viewed by the ethos of that time.This assumes that no other way no other way of intervening successfully.
I hate this. Sorry.
It should be:
"You do not shout at anyone. You do not swear at anyone. You do not make a anyone experience fear . You do not hit anyone."
What an incredibly brave woman, to waive her right to privacy in order to ensure her abusers did not get to benefit from it as well.Dear God. That's really awful. Her children thought she had Alzheimer's
Or for the behaviour of all the other men involved.OTOH, I really have no words for the behaviour of the husband that wouldn't comically diminish the awful horror of his actions. I hope his actions torture him to his dying breath.
Tbh we don't know whether the kicking he got was just what was necessary to stop him continuing his attack. The possession of a knife is mentioned, and if he'd produced it to make people intervening back off he got no more than his actions merited. There's assumptions that the people stepping in gave him more of a kicking than might have been proportionate but I don't see sufficient evidence to reach that conclusionNot sure if more violence is the answer, GarveyLives
Absolutely, yes.Or for the behaviour of all the other men involved.
If the injuries he suffered were in the cause of preventing his attack, then, frankly, expecting her rescuers to finely calibrate the level of violence to just what was necessary to stop further harm is a big ask. And I'd rather that they erred on the side of caution than held back and thereby allowed her to suffer greater harm.Tbh we don't know whether the kicking he got was just what was necessary to stop him continuing his attack. The possession of a knife is mentioned, and if he'd produced it to make people intervening back off he got no more than his actions merited. There's assumptions that the people stepping in gave him more of a kicking than might have been proportionate but I don't see sufficient evidence to reach that conclusion
Very much so. It sounds like left to his own devices he'd have killed her.If the injuries he suffered were in the cause of preventing his attack, then, frankly, expecting her rescuers to finely calibrate the level of violence to just what was necessary to stop further harm is a big ask. And I'd rather that they erred on the side of caution than held back and thereby allowed her to suffer greater harm.
Sounds like a pretty nailed-on case for "reasonable force". But I completely agree with those who are pointing out that violence isn't the solution to the problem. It's just - sometimes - the only way in the moment to stop the "problem" (an inadequate word) being worse for the victim.Very much so. It sounds like left to his own devices he'd have killed her.
True. I was thinking that but not sure what relevance it has to the thread about VAGW in the here and now?The advice was given in the late 1950s, and should be viewed by the ethos of that time.
(It's obviously good you have them and ask the questions but that they're needed and people answer yes. And probably a lot more who answer no when the real answer is actually yes.)Medical professionals - we have the HARK questions on a laminated sheet and ask every patient it any of the questions apply to them
We're mainly an msk practice but we get a couple of people a week who answer yes to one or more questions.
When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.Medical professionals - we have the HARK questions on a laminated sheet and ask every patient it any of the questions apply to them
We're mainly an msk practice but we get a couple of people a week who answer yes to one or more questions.
I went to a training session today , it was about DV perpetrators. Technically we can evict a tenant if they are found guilty of DV , provided the court grants possession. However, there is a reluctance to take these cases to court (I've never been involved in such a case in nearly 30 years in Social Housing) as there is a risk of more violence against the victim of the DV.Generally no, but in this case it stopped him from punching the woman, so it was totally justified and efficient.
It's so 'normal' that there's an NHS page about it.When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.
Pregnancy is often a trigger for domestic violence - 1 in 6 cases of men abusing their partner begin when she’s pregnant
I am astonished.When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.
Pregnancy is often a trigger for domestic violence - 1 in 6 cases of men abusing their partner begin when she’s pregnant
I'm genuinely in two opinions on this. The whole nature versus nurture thing. Yeah, but no, but yeah, but no...That's all good stuff, Sasaferrato , but I have to admit to not liking the inference that it's the mother's fault if a man is a violent misogynist. It's the man's fault/responsibility. end of.
Yes. I have appointments in my local women's hospital. (Gynae and also bladder stuff.)It's so 'normal' that there's an NHS page about it.
Domestic abuse in pregnancy
Find out about the risks of domestic abuse and violence in pregnancy, and where you can go for help if it is happening to you.www.nhs.uk
In my sisters case having a child was the trigger....a seemingly mild mannered, pleasant man turned into a controlling violent psycho....we only found out about it because her best friend informed my mum.....took 3 attempts to get her to leave, the last straw being her waking up with a pillow over her face and hands round her neck.....it never got reported as she didn't want it.....he continued his campaign right through all the continuing custody battle ( he could not accept not having full custody, not for the sake of his child but because he didn't have control)....eventually a judge saw through him and my neice never saw or heard from him again and to this day.When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.
Pregnancy is often a trigger for domestic violence - 1 in 6 cases of men abusing their partner begin when she’s pregnant
Fuck that's shameful.Thanks. He got 5 years, was out in 2.5. Fuck all given the original charge was attempted murder, but the coppers wanted an easy collar, so went for a lesser charge.
This being the 2020's, what is the updated version of the best way boys should be raised so as not to grow up as violent misogynists?The advice was given in the late 1950s, and should be viewed by the ethos of that time.
Shameful. So he got the same sentence as the rioters who damaged property and chucked stuff at coppers.Thanks. He got 5 years, was out in 2.5. Fuck all given the original charge was attempted murder, but the coppers wanted an easy collar, so went for a lesser charge.
I do find that quite astonishing - I've been seeing variations on the theme of "Ask Angela" in pubs and similar venues for years. Maybe the difference is that I was curious about it, and found out more - perhaps lots of us don't even have that curiosity. Which is, maybe, part of the problem.I was talking to a male friend the other week and was surprised he'd never heard of 'Ask for Angela'. (Although given it's generally advertised in women's toilets, I guess I shouldn't have been.)
He was surprised when I explained that it's really just a more formal way of doing what women have been doing forever. I think because we don't talk about this really, men may have no idea just how common this shit is.
I thought it took a village to raise a child?
Yep. My thoughts exactly when I saw the sentencing.Shameful. So he got the same sentence as the rioters who damaged property and chucked stuff at coppers.
Yep. My thoughts exactly when I saw the sentencing.
He very nearly avoided a custodial, unbelievably. I heard through my solicitor that he was looking at probation because, and get this, it was his first offence and 'out of character'. The cunt overpowered me, sat on top of me and stabbed me 12 times with a large chef's knife in what was described by the police as a 'frenzied attack'. He only stopped because I pretended to be dead. He believed he'd killed me. I nearly died twice, had a punctured lung, damaged liver, cut artery at the back of my head, multiple stab wounds. But ok, yeh, first offence, give him probation eh?
He only got a custodial because I was advised to and gave one of the first victim impact statements at the time (they were new back then), explaining exactly the effect it had had on me, and the judge took this very seriously.