Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Men’s violence against women and girls is a national emergency

Dear God. That's really awful. Her children thought she had Alzheimer's :(
What an incredibly brave woman, to waive her right to privacy in order to ensure her abusers did not get to benefit from it as well.

OTOH, I really have no words for the behaviour of the husband that wouldn't comically diminish the awful horror of his actions. I hope his actions torture him to his dying breath.
 
Not sure if more violence is the answer, GarveyLives
Tbh we don't know whether the kicking he got was just what was necessary to stop him continuing his attack. The possession of a knife is mentioned, and if he'd produced it to make people intervening back off he got no more than his actions merited. There's assumptions that the people stepping in gave him more of a kicking than might have been proportionate but I don't see sufficient evidence to reach that conclusion
 
Or for the behaviour of all the other men involved.
Absolutely, yes.

I sincerely hope that they, too, get their moment in the dock. People need to realise that behaviour has consequences, and behaviour as disgusting than this should have grave consequences - theirs is no less disgusting simply because it was facilitated by someone else.

ETA: and let us not forget the woman in the centre of this. Sure, she has been courageous in doing what she has done, but she will undoubtedly carry the burden of knowing what has been done to her by someone she presumably trusted, and maybe loved. Not to mention the effect of this on her children.
 
Tbh we don't know whether the kicking he got was just what was necessary to stop him continuing his attack. The possession of a knife is mentioned, and if he'd produced it to make people intervening back off he got no more than his actions merited. There's assumptions that the people stepping in gave him more of a kicking than might have been proportionate but I don't see sufficient evidence to reach that conclusion
If the injuries he suffered were in the cause of preventing his attack, then, frankly, expecting her rescuers to finely calibrate the level of violence to just what was necessary to stop further harm is a big ask. And I'd rather that they erred on the side of caution than held back and thereby allowed her to suffer greater harm.
 
If the injuries he suffered were in the cause of preventing his attack, then, frankly, expecting her rescuers to finely calibrate the level of violence to just what was necessary to stop further harm is a big ask. And I'd rather that they erred on the side of caution than held back and thereby allowed her to suffer greater harm.
Very much so. It sounds like left to his own devices he'd have killed her.
 
Very much so. It sounds like left to his own devices he'd have killed her.
Sounds like a pretty nailed-on case for "reasonable force". But I completely agree with those who are pointing out that violence isn't the solution to the problem. It's just - sometimes - the only way in the moment to stop the "problem" (an inadequate word) being worse for the victim.
 
Medical professionals - we have the HARK questions on a laminated sheet and ask every patient it any of the questions apply to them


We're mainly an msk practice but we get a couple of people a week who answer yes to one or more questions. 🫤
(It's obviously good you have them and ask the questions but :( that they're needed and people answer yes. And probably a lot more who answer no when the real answer is actually yes.)
 
Medical professionals - we have the HARK questions on a laminated sheet and ask every patient it any of the questions apply to them


We're mainly an msk practice but we get a couple of people a week who answer yes to one or more questions. 🫤
When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.

Pregnancy is often a trigger for domestic violence - 1 in 6 cases of men abusing their partner begin when she’s pregnant
 
Generally no, but in this case it stopped him from punching the woman, so it was totally justified and efficient.
I went to a training session today , it was about DV perpetrators. Technically we can evict a tenant if they are found guilty of DV , provided the court grants possession. However, there is a reluctance to take these cases to court (I've never been involved in such a case in nearly 30 years in Social Housing) as there is a risk of more violence against the victim of the DV.
 
When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.

Pregnancy is often a trigger for domestic violence - 1 in 6 cases of men abusing their partner begin when she’s pregnant
It's so 'normal' that there's an NHS page about it.

 
When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.

Pregnancy is often a trigger for domestic violence - 1 in 6 cases of men abusing their partner begin when she’s pregnant
I am astonished.
 
That's all good stuff, Sasaferrato , but I have to admit to not liking the inference that it's the mother's fault if a man is a violent misogynist. It's the man's fault/responsibility. end of.
I'm genuinely in two opinions on this. The whole nature versus nurture thing. Yeah, but no, but yeah, but no...

On the one hand, it is mainly women who are raising children, so how do they (the children) turn out the way they do? Don't women bear some responsibility for how their children turn out?*

But then again, clearly women aren't responsible for men's (mis)behaviour and crimes, obviously.

*I mean that question in a philosophical question kind of way, rather than a blamey kind of way, because I'm genuinely confused/interested as to how the Venn diagram gets drawn up here.

What responsibility do women, ie mothers (and also, I hasten to add, fathers and schools and society more generally) bear for how children turn out, for the crimes they commit? What about parents who set a bad example? Or what about parents who are neglectful? What about parents who are violent or abusive in other ways, emotionally/psychologically?

And where do you draw the line? I mean, Fred West's mother. To what extent, if any, was his upbringing a factor in him turning out to be a serial killer. Or the Yorkshire Ripper. Or [insert serial killer/rapist name here]. Are some people just inherently bad? Are some people even born evil?

But then again, there's that case of the 12-year-old rioter awaiting sentencing because his mum fucked off to Ibiza on holiday (in defiance of a court summons/order) rather than accompanying her juvenile delinquent child to court. I mean, what chance does that child have in life if that's how much she cares about him? Is that setting the best example? Should that mother be held responsible to any extent for her child's behaviour?

[As an aside: I might be wrong, but I'm guessing there's a bf who's not the 12yo boy's father, who's pointed out to mum that the holiday was pre-booked and he/they will lose the money if she doesn't go, and they can't reschedule, and if she doesn't go on the holiday he will dump her, and she's been put in the situation of having to choose between the bf and her son, and the bf won.]

Or then again, I shared that link above in which Akala schooled Piers Morgan, by pointing out how deprivation is a major factor when it comes to eg (male on male) knife crime. What about all those other environmental factors?

And coming back to your point, ElizabethofYork that it's not the mother's fault if the man is a violent misogynist... and coming back to the Venn diagram... where's the crossover point?

At what point is it the case that a mother is responsible for their child's behaviour, schooling them and keeping them in check (because it's not like they're Damian from The Omen, they're not inherently evil, right), but then that flips and the mother isn't responsible, oh no, no sirree. Is that, like, at 17-years-old and 364 days? Versus 18-years-old? Where does the line fall?

How much of how a male child turns out to be a man who is a woman injuring/killing misogynist is the responsibility of his mother for his upbringing?
How much of how a male child turns out to be a man who is a woman injuring/killing misogynist is the responsibility of his (absent?) father for his upbringing?
How much of how a male child turns out to be a man who is a woman injuring/killing misogynist is the responsibility of the education system for his schooling?
How much of how a male child turns out to be a man who is a woman injuring/killing misogynist is the responsibility of society for failing to inculcate appropriate morals and values?
How much of how a male child turns out to be a man who is a woman injuring/killing misogynist can be pinned on social media, the likes of Andrew Tate, PUAs, violent porn, etc?

I don't know the answers, I'm just asking the questions. Because while I wholeheartedly want to agree that women are not responsible in any way shape or form for men being (becoming) violent misogynists, that begs the questions who, how, what did turn them into violent misogynists?
 
It's so 'normal' that there's an NHS page about it.

Yes. I have appointments in my local women's hospital. (Gynae and also bladder stuff.)

There are posters in many ladies loo cubicles signposting to services for women suffering from domestic abuse.

And in some loos, they have different coloured marker pens, like, 'Use the blue pen to write your name on your urine sample pot if it's okay to have a joint consultation with your partner. Use the red pen to write your name on your urine sample pot if you want to speak with us privately without your partner.' So that when the women are sent to the loo to produce a urine sample, they can discretely signal to staff that there's a problem with their partner being present during the consultation, so they have a chance to talk privately.
 
When I was pregnant there were pouches with stickers in them on the back of the toilet doors in the maternity clinic I went to so you could put a sticker on your wee sample to let the medical team know you were at risk.

Pregnancy is often a trigger for domestic violence - 1 in 6 cases of men abusing their partner begin when she’s pregnant
In my sisters case having a child was the trigger....a seemingly mild mannered, pleasant man turned into a controlling violent psycho....we only found out about it because her best friend informed my mum.....took 3 attempts to get her to leave, the last straw being her waking up with a pillow over her face and hands round her neck.....it never got reported as she didn't want it.....he continued his campaign right through all the continuing custody battle ( he could not accept not having full custody, not for the sake of his child but because he didn't have control)....eventually a judge saw through him and my neice never saw or heard from him again and to this day.

I had a small circle of female friends back then....every one of them had been the victim of violence from previous boyfriends
 
I was talking to a male friend the other week and was surprised he'd never heard of 'Ask for Angela'. (Although given it's generally advertised in women's toilets, I guess I shouldn't have been.)

He was surprised when I explained that it's really just a more formal way of doing what women have been doing forever. I think because we don't talk about this really, men may have no idea just how common this shit is.
 
I was talking to a male friend the other week and was surprised he'd never heard of 'Ask for Angela'. (Although given it's generally advertised in women's toilets, I guess I shouldn't have been.)

He was surprised when I explained that it's really just a more formal way of doing what women have been doing forever. I think because we don't talk about this really, men may have no idea just how common this shit is.
I do find that quite astonishing - I've been seeing variations on the theme of "Ask Angela" in pubs and similar venues for years. Maybe the difference is that I was curious about it, and found out more - perhaps lots of us don't even have that curiosity. Which is, maybe, part of the problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sue
I thought it took a village to raise a child? 🤔


So did I, but I've been shut out and warned off enough times now that I know it's unacceptable to step in. Ever.

Seems to be permitted with kids for whom I'm designated godparent so I stick to that.


I feel that ignoring bad behaviour is shitty and neglectful. But intervening and having everything escalate strikes me as even more damaging for the child. So I stand by or retreat.





I've been physically threatened when intervening in public. Like when a kid was throwing books at the shopkeeper. I started to put my hands up and my body between the primary school child and the scared shopkeeper and the mother went for me. That's just one example. This kinda stuff does make it very difficult to show the child that different adults have different ways of dealing with things.

This was an extreme example. I've also been told not to correct a child's terrible table manners (crawling onto the table and knocking over my glass) by the mother. Child was airlifted out by furious mother. I was not shouting or waving my arms around (I asked others if I'd been to loud etc).
 
Last edited:
Shameful. So he got the same sentence as the rioters who damaged property and chucked stuff at coppers.
Yep. My thoughts exactly when I saw the sentencing.

He very nearly avoided a custodial, unbelievably. I heard through my solicitor that he was looking at probation because, and get this, it was his first offence and 'out of character'. The cunt overpowered me, sat on top of me and stabbed me 12 times with a large chef's knife in what was described by the police as a 'frenzied attack'. He only stopped because I pretended to be dead. He believed he'd killed me. I nearly died twice, had a punctured lung, damaged liver, cut artery at the back of my head, multiple stab wounds. But ok, yeh, first offence, give him probation eh?

He only got a custodial because I was advised to and gave one of the first victim impact statements at the time (they were new back then), explaining exactly the effect it had had on me, and the judge took this very seriously.
 
Yep. My thoughts exactly when I saw the sentencing.

He very nearly avoided a custodial, unbelievably. I heard through my solicitor that he was looking at probation because, and get this, it was his first offence and 'out of character'. The cunt overpowered me, sat on top of me and stabbed me 12 times with a large chef's knife in what was described by the police as a 'frenzied attack'. He only stopped because I pretended to be dead. He believed he'd killed me. I nearly died twice, had a punctured lung, damaged liver, cut artery at the back of my head, multiple stab wounds. But ok, yeh, first offence, give him probation eh?

He only got a custodial because I was advised to and gave one of the first victim impact statements at the time (they were new back then), explaining exactly the effect it had had on me, and the judge took this very seriously.

I’m so sorry that happened to you sojourner .

And I’m very glad indeed that you’ve now built a life that’s happy and fulfilling. That’s a real testament to your strength, resilience, and determination.

Thank you for sharing your story. Some people find this stuff too abstract to grasp. Hearing this extreme stuff from one of our own could help someone grasp the magnitude of the issue.
 
Back
Top Bottom