Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Mary Wollstonecraft memorial statue provokes mixed reaction

bbc iplayer has a documentary film about maggi hambling on it, i've just started but already the silver blob makes more sense, in that silver blobs are her thing.
 
It cost four and a half times the average salary and took two and a half years to unveil since it was commissioned.

Can’t help but feel it could have been completed better in half the time and at half the cost.

She did a massive scallop shell for £60k after all.
 
It cost four and a half times the average salary and took two and a half years to unveil since it was commissioned.

Can’t help but feel it could have been completed better in half the time and at half the cost.

She did a massive scallop shell for £60k after all.
I couldn't care less about the cost. I just don't think the idea isn't very well realised. Which is a shame. It feels like she could have worked a bit longer on the idea and made something better.

But it's her vision at the end of the day and my opinion of it.
 
I couldn't care less about the cost. I just don't think the idea isn't very well realised. Which is a shame. It feels like she could have worked a bit longer on the idea and made something better.

But it's her vision at the end of the day and my opinion of it.
I don't think it's just your opinion. I reckon pretty much everyone thinks it isn't very fitting.
 
It cost four and a half times the average salary and took two and a half years to unveil since it was commissioned.

Can’t help but feel it could have been completed better in half the time and at half the cost.

She did a massive scallop shell for £60k after all.
Fuck off, Gromit
 
It also just doesn't fit with the rest of the piece.
Her art is all about movement and flowing shapes and forms. Then this little mini oscar pops up. It's out of synch and jars with the rest.
Maybe that's what she meant to portray but why use a mini female body that's only a fraction away from a Barbie doll? Why not a more human form? In every sense of the word "human" with all it's imperfections and life experiences showing in some graphic way?

It's a mistake. It is not in synch with her style or other work. Some day she will admit that it's not what she had planned. I'd put money on the current base having been the finished piece only someone paying felt it needed more.
 
Maybe that's what she meant to portray but why use a mini female body that's only a fraction away from a Barbie doll? Why not a more human form? In every sense of the word "human" with all it's imperfections and life experiences showing in some graphic way?
It's really not that like a barbie doll at all. It's far more like a female version of Da Vinci's Vitruvian Man, perfectly proportioned - and very well toned.

barbie_3.jpg
 
It's really not that like a barbie doll at all. It's far more like a female version of Da Vinci's Vitruvian Man, perfectly proportioned - and very well toned.

barbie_3.jpg


Well...its not like many or most women.
It's definitely not the ordinary average woman.
Its idealised. So its all wrong in the sense that it represents feminism.
 
You know what, lets put the shoe on the other foot...lets look at how people might react to a statue of Fred Dibnah...say he gets memorialised in a statue as a muscle toned young man with his penis out.

That would not represent who he was would it?


👍
 
Curious how her vision for a fitting tribute to Wollstonecraft happened to fit so nicely within her existing brand.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If it fits with the rest of her work and that's her "brand" then that's how she projects herself as an artist. Which makes complete sense.
 
Back
Top Bottom