tim
EXPLODED TIM! (Help me!!!)
James Heartfield at "Old Spiked" thinks he knows what Feminism should be about.
An assault on a vindication of woman
An assault on a vindication of woman
Random’s good.I like the nik nak as an object but it seems a bit random.
No, commemorative art should address the topic at hand, damn it all.Random’s good.
It’s a swirling mass of female forms.No, commemorative art should address the topic at hand, damn it all.
Nice n spicy I hope and none of that scampi and lemon muck...I like the nik nak as an object but it seems a bit random.
Oh, I missed that. Or are you interpreting?It’s a swirling mass of female forms.
Looking.Oh, I missed that. Or are you interpreting?
Yes, if she was in proportion, in a “emerging” heroic stance, and being held aloft by the arms of womanhood, that’d be a much better composition and message.That's what its supposed to be apparently. But the woman on the top is too tiny and too stiff and doll like for it to work. She looks like a child mannequin in a shop window
Not seeing it and then everywoman is transcending a swirling mass of the female form not battering down the patriarchy or something useful. Bin it!Looking.
Clever re-purposing of her first attempt more like.
I think maybe if you've got a thing then sometimes it's better to stick to that thing.bbc iplayer has a documentary film about maggi hambling on it, i've just started but already the silver blob makes more sense, in that silver blobs are her thing.
I couldn't care less about the cost. I just don't think the idea isn't very well realised. Which is a shame. It feels like she could have worked a bit longer on the idea and made something better.It cost four and a half times the average salary and took two and a half years to unveil since it was commissioned.
Can’t help but feel it could have been completed better in half the time and at half the cost.
She did a massive scallop shell for £60k after all.
I don't think it's just your opinion. I reckon pretty much everyone thinks it isn't very fitting.I couldn't care less about the cost. I just don't think the idea isn't very well realised. Which is a shame. It feels like she could have worked a bit longer on the idea and made something better.
But it's her vision at the end of the day and my opinion of it.
Fuck off, GromitIt cost four and a half times the average salary and took two and a half years to unveil since it was commissioned.
Can’t help but feel it could have been completed better in half the time and at half the cost.
She did a massive scallop shell for £60k after all.
Looking at this carefully, I think it might be Gonzo from the Muppets suffocating with his head in a carrier bag.
It's really not that like a barbie doll at all. It's far more like a female version of Da Vinci's Vitruvian Man, perfectly proportioned - and very well toned.Maybe that's what she meant to portray but why use a mini female body that's only a fraction away from a Barbie doll? Why not a more human form? In every sense of the word "human" with all it's imperfections and life experiences showing in some graphic way?
It's really not that like a barbie doll at all. It's far more like a female version of Da Vinci's Vitruvian Man, perfectly proportioned - and very well toned.
any tribute to Fred Dibnah would surely include a massive erection blowing up.You know what, lets put the shoe on the other foot...lets look at how people might react to a statue of Fred Dibnah...say he gets memorialised in a statue as a muscle toned young man with his penis out.
That would not represent who he was would it?
any tribute to Fred Dibnah would surely include a massive erection blowing up.
But it's her vision at the end of the day and my opinion of it.
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. If it fits with the rest of her work and that's her "brand" then that's how she projects herself as an artist. Which makes complete sense.Curious how her vision for a fitting tribute to Wollstonecraft happened to fit so nicely within her existing brand.