Indeed. If I'd known I might have had a go myself.
The weird thing about that story is it entirely fails to mention that the statue is of a man holding a naked child to his crotch. Which seems...I dunno, relevant?It's happening again. I'm aware that I probably agree with this protestor about very little but I completely agree with him about this.
Man arrested after hammer attack on Eric Gill statue at BBC’s Broadcasting House
Man in Spider-Man mask scaled London headquarters in apparent protest against paedophile sculptorwww.theguardian.com
no one has ever said afaik whether this was his response to 'do us a statue' or if he was given a more detailed commission - how free he was with the form the work tookThe weird thing about that story is it entirely fails to mention that the statue is of a man holding a naked child to his crotch. Which seems...I dunno, relevant?
The issue isn’t that he was a paedophile and so all his work should be cancelled. The issue is that this is a paedophile statue. The allegory is right there in its name and the choice of how to portray Arial. That the BBC still choses it as its emblem is baffling.i see a lot about this statue but fuck all about the fonts he designed which are on pretty much every windows machine i've used. thought people would have something to say about those
ariel. arial is a fontThe issue isn’t that he was a paedophile. The issue is that this is a paedophile statue. The allegory is right there in its name and the choice of how to portray Arial.
Fair enough.ariel. arial is a font
Gill Sans-Commenti see a lot about this statue but fuck all about the fonts he designed which are on pretty much every windows machine i've used. thought people would have something to say about those
not to mention that 'ariel' was for years the staff magazine of the corporation, may still be for all i knowThe issue isn’t that he was a paedophile and so all his work should be cancelled. The issue is that this is a paedophile statue. The allegory is right there in its name and the choice of how to portray Arial. That the BBC still choses it as its emblem is baffling.
or done a Channel 4BBC should have taken the hints on this years ago, and flogged it off
BBC should have taken the hints on this years ago, and flogged it off
Offices and studios for the British Broadcasting Corporation (north extension not of special interest). 1930-32 by Col. G Val Myer and Watson Hart, relief panels by Eric Gill and Gilbert Bayes, etc. Portland stone on steel frame. Long frontage to Portland Place, rounded end with main entrance to Langham Place and eastern return. Shallow modelling to stepped facades in mixed Modernist-Georgian monumental style. Nine storeys with four to six storey corner clock tower pavilion massing. 35-window range to Portland Place and seven window wide rounded clock tower end. Main entrance to Langham Place has bronze doors under massive lintel and Eric Gill's "Prospero and Ariel" in niche above. The terminal pavilions to Portland Place have a shop front to south and entrance to north both surmounted by relief panels. Vertically proportioned shallow recessed metal glazing bar casements. Seven "porthole" windows in centre of top attic storey to Portland Place. Upper storeys recessed at various levels with metal balustrades at set-backs. Latticework masts over clock tower and behind. Inside the foyer the windows are flanked by pilasters with glass capitals and cornice carrying lights; Eric Gill's "The Sower" set opposite the entrance. The original, innovatory McGrath, Wells Coates, Chermayeff, etc. interiors and studio fittings removed. Thirties Exhibition Catalogue. Britain in the Thirties; A.D.Profile.
Not sure how good this guy is at destroying statues but his kerning is impressive
View attachment 375388
not to mention that 'ariel' was for years the staff magazine of the corporation, may still be for all i know
A bit unfair to the many thousands of people who have worked to there over the years.A statue by a nonce seems so apt for the BBC given all of their past and present nonce connections
I disagree with this. As an institution they’ve covered up not only their own nonces, including those who’ve not yet been exposed, but also as state media have turned a blind eye to the ones in the rest of the establishment.A bit unfair to the many thousands of people who have worked to there over the years.
Am talking about the workers... drivers, runners, cleaners, IT staff, reception staff, post workers, librarians, archivists, technicians, camera operators, kitchen staff, porters, assistants, and many more who are not the bosses or the "talent".I disagree with this. As an institution they’ve covered up not only their own nonces, including those who’ve not yet been exposed, but also as state media have turned a blind eye to the ones in the rest of the establishment.
Not sure how good this guy is at destroying statues but his kerning is impressive
View attachment 375388
Bit the other way round surely, hard to believe a paedophile's representation of a naked prepubescent form is a bit of innocent whimsy when it very much resembles a child.There may be something going on behind the banner that I'm missing, but I can't see anything particularly pedophilic about that statue, unless someone wants to argue that any depiction of a naked small figure (I believe they're supposed to be some sort of fairy or sprite, rather than a human child) with a clothed adult is automatically dodgy.
Clearly, Gill himself did some abhorrent things, but that doesn't make this statue a depiction of pedophilia.