Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Lambeth Council Watch - news and updates about the 'co-operative' council

Does anyone know if they will publish the workings of this bit?
At this point (nearly 7 pm Saturday) it would appear they haven't yet been able to do the calculation

The 11 London-wide Assembly Members are elected using a form of proportional representation
Votes from across London for the London-wide Assembly Members are added together. The 11 seats are then allocated based upon a mathematical formula – the Modified d’Hondt Formula. This takes into account the total votes cast in the London-wide ballot together with the number of constituency Assembly member seats that each political party has already won.

Eleven rounds of calculations take place to fill the 11 vacant Assembly member seats, and the party or independent candidate with the highest result at each round is allocated the seat. Seats won by parties are allocated to party candidates in the order they appear on the relevant party’s list of candidates.
There was a results factsheet (and a less than intuitive spreadsheet ) published a few days after the 2021 result. I expect something similar will come out this time.

Screenshot_20240504-220239.png
 
As of now, this would seem to be the only info:

I look forward (not) to seeing what kind of bile susan hall and reform UK’s alex wilson spout in the jobs we’ll be paying them to do the next few years. Maybe they can get with LORD goldsmith and do a hate-fuelled variety show on GB news.
Maybe the de Hondt method works then?
2 Lib Dems (one directly elected for Kingston/Richmond)
2 Greens
1 Reform (unfortunately)

Edit: that should have read 3 Greens
 
Last edited:
As the article says, it doesn't cover the northern wards of Vauxhall and Waterloo (where all the most expensive glossy, corporate development has been focussed). Lambeth's reasoning behind this is:

The 23 wards selected have significantly high numbers of privately rented properties in poor condition. The council has chosen to exclude the wards Vauxhall and Waterloo & South Bank as the properties in these wards tend to be relatively new builds and therefore do not have the high levels of housing hazards that we see in other parts of the borough.

Significantly high numbers of privately rented properties in poor condition. Yet their own chart shows that, whilst Waterloo does possibly have the lowest number of privately rented homes in poor condition, it is by no means an outlier. There is only a hairs breadth between Waterloo and Brixton North, Brixton Windrush, Clapham Common, Clapham East, Myatts Fields and Stockwell East. And all of those wards appear to have lower numbers of privately rented properties in poor condition than Vauxhall (which is also excused PRS licensing). I say "possibly" and "appear" because the absolute numbers have not been published and repeated requests for the data behind the chart have been ignored for over two months


1715332260833.png

Although their statement says that the basis for exclusion of Vauxhall and Waterloo is "the number of privately rented homes in poor condition", no doubt Lambeth would retrospectively argue that proportionally the two are lowest. But why are roughly 260 substandard homes in Vauxhall less priority than 240 in Brixton North or Brixton Windrush? Looking at proportionality does not make sense unless they feel that their licensing is a disproportionate imposition on landlords of decent properties. It can't be that because they claim the scheme is a positive thing for the decent landlords subject to it.

The fact is that licensing fees are only allowed to be used to fund the licensing system they form a part of. They cannot be used to raise funds towards anything else. By including the recent luxury developments of Waterloo and Vauxhall (which have the highest numbers of private lets in Lambeth) in the scheme they would be able to spread the cost of the licensing scheme and reduce the fees considerably. Whilst they say that there is no evidence that fees will be passed on, they don't offer any evidence that they won't.

I see that Cllr Hashi is in charge of this. Having seen his impressive outburst in a recent public meeting about anti social behaviour, in which he was put on the spot for failing to deliver a long anticipated ASB strategy, I'm not sure I'd feel all that comfortable challenging him face to face on this myself!
 
Last edited:

Lambeth setting it's own example of how to be a landlord.

Fortunately this tenant had good legal representation and Lambeth had to cough up thousands in damages.

It's astonishing that legal action had to be re started as Lambeth did not keep to what previous legal action said Lambeth should do to rectify disrepair.
 
I've seen several other councillors mentioned as having aspirations elsewhere but not sure if they've been selected. Jim of Herne Hill for one seems to be in Deptford a fair bit.
 
I've seen several other councillors mentioned as having aspirations elsewhere but not sure if they've been selected. Jim of Herne Hill for one seems to be in Deptford a fair bit.
Can't see that - if you mean Jim Dickson taking over from Vicky Foxcroft.
Admittedly he is only 60 (according to Wikipedia) - but then she is 47.
JD stood unsuccessfully in Old Bexley and Sidcup in 2001 - after Ted Heath retired from parliament.
No record of any subsequent parliamentary forays.
 
Oh I guess he might just be doing some sort of CLP outreach. I understand that most inner London CLPs have been twinned with a Home Counties CLP.

I have a vague memory I saw him tweet about running for selection.
 
Lucky Jim was tempted by the new Streatham and Norbury seat. He then realised that the man who is possibly the only Labour party member with more extreme right views than him has already blagged the gig.
 
Of what a surprise!


There again at least Fenwick is being regenerated, and without a storm of protest.
Wonder why that is? No leaseholders probably.
 
Dartford's a Conservative seat at the moment, with an 18,000 majority, but likely winnable for Labour, so this is probably the last we'll see of him.
I'm pretty sure JD was party to the policy of flying the European flag on Lambeth Town Hall except on the Queen's birthday or full council meetings - which nearly all councillors voted for.
Presumably he'll have to do a Farage transformation in Dartford according to this graphic (assuming the issue comes up)
Purple UKIP Labour up there mate my cab driver says!
 
I'm pretty sure JD was party to the policy of flying the European flag on Lambeth Town Hall except on the Queen's birthday or full council meetings - which nearly all councillors voted for.
Presumably he'll have to do a Farage transformation in Dartford according to this graphic (assuming the issue comes up)
Purple UKIP Labour up there mate my cab driver says!

I think you're right. He's not exactly presenting himself as a bold EU loving remainer here.

Rule Brittania.PNG

It's almost as if he'll pretend to believe anything to get elected.
 
Who is the Tory candidate for Dulwich & West Norwood?
Whoever it is might struggle to get the name recognition of the main party candidates:
Helen Hayes
Pete Elliott
Donna Harris
 
Who is the Tory candidate for Dulwich & West Norwood?
Whoever it is might struggle to get the name recognition of the main party candidates:
Helen Hayes
Pete Elliott
Donna Harris
Helen Hayes had a 25k majority last time over the Greens and Tories. Probably be given to a newbie Tory candidate for the experience. Think I saw that the party were so taken by surprise on the election date, that 100 constituencies didn't have a candidate chosen.
 
Who is the Tory candidate for Dulwich & West Norwood?
Whoever it is might struggle to get the name recognition of the main party candidates:
Helen Hayes
Pete Elliott
Donna Harris
It's one of the 93 seats where the Conservatives haven't yet chosen a candidate. There's still time for you to throw your hat in the ring CH1.
 
I think you're right. He's not exactly presenting himself as a bold EU loving remainer here.

View attachment 425918

It's almost as if he'll pretend to believe anything to get elected.
To be fair this is standard Labour livery isn't it? Like Aldi and Lidl beers have union jack caps.
Makes me nauseous. The country decided by 0,2% to Leave the EU on the recommendation of Kate Hoey and Nigel Farage.
Now everything has to have union jacks on it for 100 years.
Disgusting. No only disgusting - it's pathetic.
 
Find this really bizarre that some find it weird that some councillors might want to become MPs.

What’s the issue? That they should only focus on being a councillor? That they should have more of a connection with where they want to be an MP? General hatred for people wanting to be politicians?
 
Find this really bizarre that some find it weird that some councillors might want to become MPs.

What’s the issue? That they should only focus on being a councillor? That they should have more of a connection with where they want to be an MP? General hatred for people wanting to be politicians?
They’re basically baby politicians aren’t they?
 
Find this really bizarre that some find it weird that some councillors might want to become MPs.

What’s the issue? That they should only focus on being a councillor? That they should have more of a connection with where they want to be an MP? General hatred for people wanting to be politicians?
I know this sort of thing is widespread, but I don't know how someone can want to represent an area unless they've lived there for a while. To me it feels dishonest. I think Lambeth is the best place in the world, and I want my local politicians to beleive that too. How can someone claim that they're the best person to represent what Lambeth residents feel and also claim that they're the best person to represent what Dartfod (or wherever) residents feel. They can't be both.
 
Back
Top Bottom