Probably since the block was built. There are ways to bill residents individually , heat meters are now being used in some council blocks/estates. Residents then pay a heating charge based on usage, otherwise it is spread out amongst all the residents, regardless of usage.How long has communual heating been in place with no ability to be charged individually based on share of usage?
It wouldn't be difficult for the Government to allow these heating charges to be covered by HB/UC rent element temporarily, the current heating charges of around £50pw are impossible to pay if you are on benefits.Increased rent and communal charges for Tower Hamlets community housing too (from FB earlier)
View attachment 365470
People do. Same in Manchester, which is the council equivalent of a one party state. One of those places where you could stick a rosette on a donkey and it would get voted in.I'm not having a pop here, but that is plain stupid, why vote for people who serially fuck you over?
People do. Same in Manchester, which is the council equivalent of a one party state. One of those places where you could stick a rosette on a donkey and it would get voted in.
Although having said that, our current councillors - who got involved and got elected around th Corbyn era, are actually really good now, really engaged, do a lot for the community, are very good at representing residents' views rather than toe-ing the party line, and they work all year round, don't just do a couple of photo ops just before the elections to stick pics in the campaign leaflets.
Not sure how much longer they'll last under the Starmer regime, given that they care more about the people than the party.
In a time when we're being told to cut back energy use, offering a system where you may as well keep the heating on full blast all day and night long is hardly the way forward.So - is the issue that the council communal heating systems are clapped out and inefficient? Or is it that people are being charged for continuous 24 hour use (like me) with no choice to opt out?
As for tenants, it's like going to a pub and being charged for ten pints even if you only want one.
There was nothing anyone could do - in the 28 years I've been here, there's only ever been the choice of turning off radiators, and latterly, the ability to adjust the temperature to one one of two temps via a cheapo thermostat.But no one seemed to care when it was cheaper?
There was nothing anyone could do - in the 28 years I've been here, there's only ever been the choice of turning off radiators, and latterly, the ability to adjust the temperature to one one of two temps via a cheapo thermostat.
Given that that energy crisis is a relatively new thing, I imagine many people are now thinking harder about how they can do things better. I imagine a lot of people didn't think much about their energy usage when it was cheaper, regardless of where they lived.
I guess the issue is twofold:I'm intrigued by this communal heating issue. It always used to be assumed to be more efficient. And also used as an incentive in such places as Millwall and Bromley where they have incinerators supplying combined heat and power.
I am a private householder, not a tenant and have my own boiler. My December and January gas/electricity combined bills were over £400 each month - but I guess the soace I'm heating is double most council flats, and although I have double glazing and roof insulation I do not have a cavity wall, or cavity wall insulation.
I choose to have my heating on all the time, because I'm in all the time.. The only concession I've made to economising is reducing the thermostat from 20.5 to 20 - and I have also turned right down the thermostatic radiator valves in less used rooms.
So - is the issue that the council communal heating systems are clapped out and inefficient? Or is it that people are being charged for continuous 24 hour use (like me) with no choice to opt out?
I guess it would be almost impossible to ascertain that the costs are for each communal system in isolation and thereby check up on if this is fairly apportioned?
What seemed a good system in a low energy cost era has turned out to be a cause of discontent or injustice now?
Bloody hell! And this is supposedly a Labour council?I forgot to add that the back of the letter also helpfully advises residents that they can "avoid paying the revised rent by ending their tenancy."
This is cruel, harsh language to people already struggling to make ends meet.
I'm slowly stirring up some political responses to these increases and will be reporting back yet. I think even Lambeth know that shunting these huge increases on council tenants without consultation or sufficient warning, or giving them any means to reduce their own energy consumption is really unacceptable.
Elections in May?
Standard wording on my (Tower Hamlets) Council rent increase notices for as long as I can recall. I suspect there is some legal reason for including it.I forgot to add that the back of the letter also helpfully advises residents that they can "avoid paying the revised rent by ending their tenancy."
This is cruel, harsh language to people already struggling to make ends meet.
My landlord is Haringey Council, and they haven't yet given me notice of rent increase for next year, so it will be less than 4 weeks notice when it finally comes.
Have you asked any leaseholders how much they are being charged? On some estates leaseholders are being charged much less for their heating and hot water per annum. Almost £2,000 less, in fact. Lambeth are taking advantaged of the poorest.
To clarify. I've just had a convo with a leaseholder. Their charges have only increased by £200 per year.Have you asked any leaseholders how much they are being charged? On some estates leaseholders are being charged much less for their heating and hot water per annum. Almost £2,000 less, in fact. Lambeth are taking advantaged of the poorest.