butchersapron
Bring back hanging
In italics
You're wrong btw, my personal enjoment is to the fore.
You're wrong btw, my personal enjoment is to the fore.
In italics
You're wrong btw, my personal enjoment is to the fore.
There's zero joy to be had, we- the public - are doing the work of journalism teachers and editors without being paid.
Will Johann Hari or Simon Kelner give up any of their wealth?
I didn't know Kelner was such a liar either: @JohannHari101 has worked at @theIndynews for 10 years. In that time, we have not had a single complaint about his misrepresenting anyone' Just wow.
or maybe reporting and comment are going the way of the music industry and is for an increasing number of people is losing whatever authority it had, interesting piece here from DSG on such matters.
DSG would neither expect or desire to be paid for their role in nailing that lil cunt Hari.
http://www.newstatesman.com/200005220006Hacks at the Independent say that Simon Kelner, its editor, receives about £250,000 - roughly £50,000 more than his predecessors Rosie Boycott and Andrew Marr.
The system of parliamentary democracy and capitalist media as it exists in Britain simply wasn’t designed as a transparent system, and technological developments, hitting at the same time as a restructuring crisis, are forcing open those contradictions. Faced with its Napster Moment, the parliamentary system has two options- either to acknowledge the changing conditions, or, like the music industry, to plough ahead with the current model, and use increasingly repressive and authoritarian tactics to enforce its legitimacy amongst its client base.
The hacking scandal isn’t an event that will lead to a cleaning up of the media and a return to the “values” the NOTW hacks seemingly undermined; rather, it is the spreading of a process of delegitimisation running concurrently across societies worldwide, from the authoritarian regimes of North Africa to the War on Drugs in the US, or the rise of Lulzsec.
The wider question that has been passing round militants in the DSG network: Is Murdoch’s “Wikileaks moment” symptomatic of the Establishment’s Napster Moment? The corruption and nepotism of the closed circle of politicians, press and police was a disgusting necessity for the efficient running of the state in the interests of the status quo, but it worked because it was hidden, neatly covered with the facade of the consensus of progressive patriotism, classless society rhetoric and the meritocracy. This conspiracy was a vital tool of governance, but now a precedent of bottom-up transparency has been set, whereby those of us who are excluded from the circles of power have the technological tools (and will) for the constant revelation of such scandals. An endless appetite for transparency, causing an infinite loop of scandal, resulting in a revolving door of administrations. The system of parliamentary democracy and capitalist media as it exists in Britain simply wasn’t designed as a transparent system, and technological developments, hitting at the same time as a restructuring crisis, are forcing open those contradictions. Faced with its Napster Moment, the parliamentary system has two options- either to acknowledge the changing conditions, or, like the music industry, to plough ahead with the current model, and use increasingly repressive and authoritarian tactics to enforce its legitimacy amongst its client base.
DSG would neither expect or desire to be paid for their role in nailing that lil cunt Hari.
A few more weeks for audiotech to find the time to read that blogpost.
I don't think you can assume to speak on their behalf.
Hari's saved. The part scab Hundal is defending him http://liberalconspiracy.org/2011/0...kers-dispute-allegations-against-johann-hari/
Yep, they are - i reckon Thompson kept them part back in order for some muppet like hundal to jump in - he must have known those other emails were doing the rounds the last few days. Even funnier is that loads of Hari's liberal defenders have jumped back into the fray, misled by the spin Hundal has put on it. They've been mugged again.
It's as if we had another Conrad walking among us. (NB, should that be 'amongst'?)
It's as if we had another Conrad walking among us. (NB, should that be 'amongst'?)
Again and again, we come back to Kelner. He hired a raw young star about whom doubts had already been expressed at the New Statesman, and relentlessly promoted and protected him. Hari didn’t get the firm editorial hand a young journalist needs; his columns don’t seem to have been subjected to fact-checking or serious editing (comparing Hari’s columns on the Indy site with his own site, one sees that Indy editorial broke up his long paragraphs and corrected a few obvious howlers, but little else); he clearly was never given the training or mentoring he needed (and if Hari thought he didn’t need training, Kelner should have insisted). Hari was given plenty of resources – one hears stories of Indy interns doing mountains of photocopying that would then be couriered over to the great man (couriered, I ask you, as if he was Peter fucking Mandelson) – but didn’t give him what he really needed, a guiding hand. More experienced hacks who had concerns about the infant prodigy’s work soon learned that the editor didn’t want to hear these criticisms.
Yes, that article makes things significantly worse for Hari. Originally the Der Speigel one just looked like he was being a lazy rip-off merchant, now he looks like an intellectually bankrupt quote chopper. Should say that the bloke who wrote that had a falling out with hundal over publishing it. How very brave of suny.