I had more in mind international waters closer to the Korean penninsula; my point was not Med-specific.north koreans in the mediterranean? you're having a fucking laugh
Presumably Israel takes the view that their blockade is legal. If that's the case, I suspect that it was never likely that they'd willingly allow the blockade to be breached - preferring instead to maintain that 'defend the legal blockade' stance by pre-emptively taking 'defensive' action in international waters.
Just how far out into international waters they're prepared to take their acceptable 'defensive' action/s, is something that interests me. It was also a question that I asked Sas earlier ... but he seems to have missed it.
**BBC reporting Hamas are saying that the Gaza - Egypt border crossing is open until further notice**
as someone who doesn't know a great deal about the situation, what does this mean?
I think they expected it to get very tense in Israeli waters yes, sounds reasonable to me. But to be murdered in international waters? Well given no-one else the US/UK and especially the Turkish govt who sponsored it expected it, then no.
as someone who doesn't know a great deal about the situation, what does this mean?
Protecting their nation and their people.
while the attack on the Commandos maybe was spontaneous, looking at the videos, the rioters had gas masks, metal sticks, tear gas grenade or plural. Imo, i suspect most people on the ship were pacifists, etc, but a small perhaps self selected group may have set themselves up as a 'self defence' force. as for not expecting it, a fair few of these activists has involvement in the anti-globalisation movements of the 00's, and would have expected the unexpected(as happened in genoa, where it was incredible more lives were not lost)
http://theonlydemocracy.org/2010/05...aeli-jewish-public-support-the-gaza-flotilla/We must resist the self-serving and disempowering statements of our political leaders who would have us believe that there is no solution to the conflict with the Palestinians, that there is “no partner for peace,” that we are doomed to perpetual war and, therefore, we must become permanent oppressors. The Palestinians are not our enemies; our own political leaders are. The very fact that I, an Israeli Jew, was welcomed by the people of Gaza makes that very point, and it is the message they asked me to convey to you. But they also insist on their rights: self-determination.
We of the Israeli peace camp refuse to be enemies with our Palestinian neighbors. We recognize that as the infinitely stronger party in the conflict, we Israelis must accept responsibility for our failed and oppressive policies.
Where have you got this crap from? How is it that a declared Islam-phobic recluse like you knows exactly what happened on board?
Please reveal the source for your Regev-like repetition of how Israel would rather the world viewed their unjustifiable actions.
Where have you got this crap from? How is it that a declared Islam-phobic recluse like you knows exactly what happened on board?
The ceasefire ended in December 2008 when Israel launched a three week assault on Gaza in response to Hamas rocket attacks
Look, it is surely unarguable that the reception some of those commandos got was clearly violent and some of them definately got battered. The decision by the IDF to drop them, individually, into the mob is clearly what kicked all of this off.
However I doubt the people aboard had tear gas grenades, and gas masks / "weapons" (axes, metal poles, cutlery etc) are usually to be found aboard large ships anyway, that people had those items does not suggest premeditation.
The BBC bias is pretty bloody awful isn't it? I never really gave it much stock before but there's just little things you notice isn't there, like this piece on now the reporter said (paraphrase):
True, except they missed out the bit where Israel actually broke the ceasefire initially by killing six people allegedly digging a tunnel. It was these killings that started the rocket fire again.
Sorry to hear that you had a friend on the ships. Israel did give clear warning however that the convoy would not get through the blockade.
Why are so many people appearing to support Hamas, an unelected body who took Gaza at gunpoint, rather than Israel who have a democratically elected government? Why support a body that is firing rockets into a civilian population?
while the attack on the Commandos maybe was spontaneous, looking at the videos, the rioters had gas masks, metal sticks, tear gas grenade or plural. Imo, i suspect most people on the ship were pacifists, etc, but a small perhaps self selected group may have set themselves up as a 'self defence' force. as for not expecting it, a fair few of these activists has involvement in the anti-globalisation movements of the 00's, and would have expected the unexpected(as happened in genoa, where it was incredible more lives were not lost)
you prick, its on the videos that are being broadcast hourly on all the media, I am no Israel supporter, but I do like to make my own judgement and wait for the facts
oh, and whats with the 'recluse' bit, know something i don't
Look, it is surely unarguable that the reception some of those commandos got was clearly violent and some of them definately got battered. The decision by the IDF to drop them, individually, into the mob is clearly what kicked all of this off.
However I doubt the people aboard had tear gas grenades, and gas masks / "weapons" (axes, metal poles, cutlery etc) are usually to be found aboard large ships anyway, that people had those items does not suggest premeditation.
I think the premeditation is more evidenced by the reception that the commandos got.
It doesn't necessarily have to constitute sailing with a weapons cache.
If you go into a situation with an item that has been adapted for or is being employed as a weapon with violent intent then that is premeditation in my book.
I think the premeditation is more evidenced by the reception that the commandos got.
It doesn't necessarily have to constitute sailing with a weapons cache.
If you go into a situation with an item that has been adapted for or is being employed as a weapon with violent intent then that is premeditation in my book.
weepiper said:yep, I'm noticing it more and more too... just now they said 'when Hamas took control of Gaza in 2007'. Oh, I think you mean when they were elected by the public
I think the premeditation is more evidenced by the reception that the commandos got.
exactly, plenty of poster on here have 'form' they know what happens on these large scale protests, how there are always a few who want to take it further,
having said that, i don't really know what happened as neither do the posters, though of course a number of people are now dead, tragic.
Save your typing time, the anti-Semitic brigade will not listen. They are not interested in facts, only in having a pop at the Jews on every available occasion.
I think the premeditation is more evidenced by the reception that the commandos got.
It doesn't necessarily have to constitute sailing with a weapons cache.
If you go into a situation with an item that has been adapted for or is being employed as a weapon with violent intent then that is premeditation in my book.