Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

If fascism arose again in Europe, what would the British response be?

Yeah but:

I would hazard a guess that DM readers are pretty representative of what this country is thinking.
Based on what? You hazarding a guess? Year on year the social attitudes survey says the opposite. The polls say the opposite. The election results say the opposite.

These are your words.
 
I would hazard a guess that DM readers are pretty representative of what this country is thinking.

Yeah that's my point, loads of daily mail readers read it for the crosswords or whatever or they agree with some but not all of it. The daily mail is a popular paper sold everywhere in britain, it has some horrible right-wing views in it and I may be slightly naive here but I don't think they represent the entire country, judging by the reactions on their comments pages they don't even represent most daily mail readers. i don't think that the daily mail would have had most of the success that it's had if it was hardcore fascist, I honestly don't think so, because I don't think that people would tolerate it being sold if it was. I mean a lot of people only buy it so they can laugh at it (or wind up people who don't like it) And anyway sales of ALL newspapers are declining ...
 
Most of the people I see buying the daily mail are old ladies, i find it hard to get that worked up about it :confused:
 
Yeah that's my point, loads of daily mail readers read it for the crosswords or whatever or they agree with some but not all of it. The daily mail is a popular paper sold everywhere in britain, it has some horrible right-wing views in it and I may be slightly naive here but I don't think they represent the entire country, judging by the reactions on their comments pages they don't even represent most daily mail readers. i don't think that the daily mail would have had most of the success that it's had if it was hardcore fascist, I honestly don't think so, because I don't think that people would tolerate it being sold if it was. I mean a lot of people only buy it so they can laugh at it (or wind up people who don't like it) And anyway sales of ALL newspapers are declining ...

Agreed. In all honesty, it's quite mild compared to some of the views I've encountered in everyday life and online.
 
Agreed. In all honesty, it's quite mild compared to some of the views I've encountered in everyday life and online.
yeah, i agree. but i don't think that an openly fascist paper would be tolerated here. i don't think shops would sell it and i don't think that people (anti fash but also anyone decent) would let them get away with it if they did. Maybe i'm naive but I really don't think it would happen. Lots of people might be a bit nationalist but still madly opposed to fascism, there is a reason why there were thousands of battles in the streets in the 20s and 30s in germany and italy between the fash and other people who might even have been slightly racist but knew what they were. having slightly racist opinions might help fascism to develop but it won't mean you are a fascist, if they couldn't get the full support of the population of germany and italy where they took power, there would be no way they could get it here
 
Based on what? You hazarding a guess? Year on year the social attitudes survey says the opposite. The polls say the opposite. The election results say the opposite.

Such pathetic fear. It's everyone else and they read the daily mail.

You disgust me.

Haha. The over-the-top-ness of that last line made me chuckle out loud. :D
 
also even in the 30s and 20s when the holocaust etc hadn't happened yet and the mood of the people who ran the media was a lot more favourable to them, so many people recognised fascism for what it was and didn't tolerate it, and i am sure some of those people would have read the daily mail
 
also even in the 30s and 20s when the holocaust etc hadn't happened yet and the mood of the people who ran the media was a lot more favourable to them, so many people recognised fascism for what it was and didn't tolerate it, and i am sure some of those people would have read the daily mail
yes: but what did the likes of stanley baldwin and ramsay macdonald do about it?

certainly in hackney you have fascist activity happening from at least 1926 onwards, it's not as all this was 'in europe' over the water.
 
also even in the 30s and 20s when the holocaust etc hadn't happened yet and the mood of the people who ran the media was a lot more favourable to them, so many people recognised fascism for what it was and didn't tolerate it, and i am sure some of those people would have read the daily mail
They didn't recognise it for what it was. Fascism did not get a hold here because of great ground up organising. The media was neither here nor there.
 
Bit off topic, but I read somewhere recently that the Daily Mail and the Guardian have very large US online readerships, big enough to rival some of the big US papers. Why those two in particular I have no idea.

The stuff about Mail Online is on the last couple of pages but this whole story is worth a read:

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2012/04/02/120402fa_fact_collins

The site evolved on the fly. “We just decided to go hell-for-leather for ratings,” someone who was involved in the launch told me. “Anything relating to climate change, American politics, Muslims—we just chased the numbers very ruthlessly.” Traffic, at home and abroad, began to climb.
 
They didn't recognise it for what it was. Fascism did not get a hold here because of great ground up organising. The media was neither here nor there.

yeah, that's the point i am making. the media had very little to do with it, but plenty of people were really opposed to it anyway and were able to stop them organising and meeting here. unless i have misunderstood you.
 
totally, but a lot of people didn't tolerate them then and wouldn't now
yes a lot of people didn't tolerate them, but on the streets there was no pre-war opposition similar to the post-war 43 group. a lot of people did tolerate them, and frankly a lot of people tolerate or even support fascists now. if there was a disciplined, organised, relatively honest far-right party then it would be challenging in elections, as the bnp's shown is possible. it's not that people don't tolerate them, but that they're so disorganised and shit that has in this country proved their greatest obstacle electorally.
 
yes a lot of people didn't tolerate them, but on the streets there was no pre-war opposition similar to the post-war 43 group. a lot of people did tolerate them, and frankly a lot of people tolerate or even support fascists now. if there was a disciplined, organised, relatively honest far-right party then it would be challenging in elections, as the bnp's shown is possible. it's not that people don't tolerate them, but that they're so disorganised and shit that has in this country proved their greatest obstacle electorally.

Yeah, I know. :) It's just that I don't think the daily mail has much to do with it, I also think a lot of their soft support would fall away if they were regularly doing the same stuff that Golden Dawn were doing (i mean beating immigrants up, padlocking a playground, involved in murders and other shit) a lot of people support fascists or think they do because of law and order, if they were regularly doing that stuff on a daily basis here some people would support it, but i think a lot of people here would be revolted by it. even in greece the post election polls show that golden dawn's support has dropped since the election by about half, altho i don't know how serious to take that. I dunno but I think most people are basically all right, I do believe that most people wouldn't agree with it and some would organise to stop them. Naive I know but I think most people are all right really, including the daily mail readers. I don't think that if there was a situation of them possibly getting to power that the majority of people would want to let them. and yeah a lot of people could support them but there's at least a large minority of their soft support that could be convinced (or convince themselves!) not to.
 
did someone come up with the answer what would Britain do if Greece crashed out the euro...800million dollars withdrawn in a day from Greek bank accounts.

Thing is how long before food/water riots, businesses go under suppliers don't want to get in debt when will they pay?....strong arm police..borderline military rule by the end of the year, 2012.
 
Back
Top Bottom