Raheem
Well-Known Member
I don't even care.
So keep it to yourself.
I don't even care.
So keep it to yourself.
Ok. Can you come here and give me some more advice on how to live? I think I might need it. I'll pay your train fare. Or, thinking about it, maybe half.
No worries. I knew you were.I'm just an amateur, not properly trained. Sorry.
What I have against people like Owen Jones is not the fact they are humanly fallible. It's that they should have known better than to collude with an establishment they decry in books and columns even if they, like me, sometimes lose their faith in human nature.
Owen Smith?Im not convinced sorry. There is a difference between actively and knowingly colluding with the establishment and voicing an opinion that HAPPENS to chime in with those of that establishment.
His timing of said articles was arguably poorly timed but again I think he in no way knowingly colluded with the establishment
Owen Smith?
It's about careers. Careers, that's all. Anything might happen politically, and they might not like it. But the career will be intact.Im not convinced sorry. There is a difference between actively and knowingly colluding with the establishment and voicing an opinion that HAPPENS to chime in with those of that establishment.
His timing of said articles was arguably poorly timed but again I think he in no way knowingly colluded with the establishment
Jones came out in favour of blatant establishment member, Smith.Jones
Im not convinced sorry. There is a difference between actively and knowingly colluding with the establishment and voicing an opinion that HAPPENS to chime in with those of that establishment.
His timing of said articles was arguably poorly timed but again I think he in no way knowingly colluded with the establishment
OJ, putting in the work now- will end up on the right side of history if it kills him :
It was bad enough for him to help destabilise the leadership as far as I am concerned but okay... say that he felt compelled to, for someone with a "foot in the movement" and who's also au fait with the big money bubble and the way it operates, did he really have to do it from the Guardian and Twitter???.
And then didn't propose an alternative in the same line as Corbyn's when he "lost faith" in the leadership. He jumped straight from Corbyn to someone who backed big pharma. He outed himself there and then.
tbf to OJ, whilst he lost his bottle re: Corbo, did he ever back the laughable Smith ?
Give me Gary Younge any time over Owen Jones.
“The ideas of the ruling class,” Karl Marx pointed out, “are in every epoch the ruling ideas.” That’s how a man who talked with Sinn Féin (a strategy that stood the test of time) can be constantly interrogated about his support for “terrorism” while a woman who joined a party that branded Nelson Mandela a terrorist is never asked about her support for Apartheid.
He didn't explictly back Smith, but he called for a change of leadership when Smith was the only option available iirc. So, sort of.
I think he just lost his nerve. He's worked hard to make up for it the last month or so though - his wasn't an election night mea culpa.
A mate of mine voted for Owen Smith but when Corbs got back in again and especially when they started doing well in the polls got quite upset at labour centrists trying to undermine him.
Sure but if he's sensible Corbs will keep a lid on any labour infighting for the next six months at least or at least keep it away from the cameras.
I sometimes wish we in the left had a bit more of the ruthlessness of the right.
it's hard to feel too generous spirited towards those that suddenly perked up when the polls started to rise ( 4 weeks out ) , especially with the squalid DUP now lording it , due to 10 seat difference