Puddy_Tat
naturally fluffy
That not being a bastard went too far, I think.
There were people - Danczuk being the most obvious - who could and should have been made an example of. They had every justification - political, moral, criminal - for booting him out of the party, but didn't. Not doing it was shameful.
from where i'm sitting, it seems that corbyn approached being party leader more as a chair / convenor rather than a 'boss' which was at odds with what most people expect of party leaders.
I've never come close to understanding the labour party rules, but how much can a party leader do on their own - especially if they don't have the support and co-operation of the party machine? (as in the anti-semitism allegations that the party machine allegedly sat on to spin it all out as long as possible then spun it as further 'evidence' of jc's anti-semitism when he tried to poke the party machine in to doing something about it all.)
But now it seems that starmer is just being allowed to make the rules up as he goes along.
And of course if corbyn had tried to deal with any of it then how much would have been made in the press of 'anti-democratic - stalinist - purge' and so on?