Sometimes they don’t even acknowledge it. Sometimes they ignore the abuse, or don’t care.
I went to a photo exhibition about normal stuff. As I walked into one of the rooms, dead centre ahead, at eye level, framed by the doorway as I walked in was a photo of Savile leering. It was absoltuely in keeping with the exhibition and it was clever curation for that part of the show (telly being ubiquitous, the alter in the front room, the hearth fire of saturday night telly etc). As someone who was molested by Savile , it hit me in the centre of my chest and almost laid me out. I had to do the taking care of myself,personal intervention, emotional housekeeping, all in public. Given the prolific nature of his behaviour I highly doubt I was the only person this happened to. I later wrote to them and asked if maybe they could move the photo so it wasn’t such a dramatic thing. They said blah blah Sorry about that, No can’t do that, artistic integrity the nature of the show it’s in context yadda yadda.
The really shitty thing about this was that they did acknowledge, in the notes, what he’d done and the impact it had had. They even highlighted it with newspaper headlines and photos from other contempiracy stories, to indicate the social mores and ambiguities of the time. But when an actual victim asked for actual consideration , the art was prioritised.
In fact they were actively capitalising on the hammer blow effect of his crimes by placing the photo as they did.
And while we’re on the subject,
Bahnhof Strasse still owes me an apology and has refused to give it.
2011, still counting