ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
REALLY??
I find the possibilities for underlying pathology interesting. I don't go for all that "bed-wetter" nonsense, though. Most cases of enuresis are due to physical rather than emotional issues.
REALLY??
i would posit that in diamond's case it's a bit from column a and a bit from column bI find the possibilities for underlying pathology interesting. I don't go for all that "bed-wetter" nonsense, though. Most cases of enuresis are due to physical rather than emotional issues.
as it's friday why not give him the weekend off? it might be the kindest thing to doOh great. Another Friday, another flurry of reports about Diamond disrupting a thread. This is a particularly important one
No, but he was certainly acting as a legislator post diagnosis. I'm not sure how many of the instructions he made post diagnosis (as in the rough time line I did below) were under Power of Attorney?Does anyone know when his dementia set in, and how that overlaps with the timeline of investigation/prosecution?
This is not the thread for this beef. Take it elsewhere.No, no.
This is this thread. This is the forum for discussion.
There are no other fora better suited.
You are a spineless apologist for an idiot who thought they were making a great point through the medium of racist prejudice,
How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?
No, but he was certainly acting as a legislator post diagnosis. I'm not sure how many of the instructions he made post diagnosis (as in the rough time line I did below) were under Power of Attorney?
Writes book - 2008
Diagnosed with alzheimers - 2009
Dec 2012 - delivers speech in Lords
Dec 2013 - house raided
Oct 2014 - 'on leave'
March 2014 - has mental capacity to pass his mansion to the kids, one of whom is linked to the DPP
April 2015 - Milord will not be charged, due to mental capacity
April 2015 + a few days - It's okay, I'm fine! Can I come back to work?"
April 2015 + a few days - It's okay, I'm fine! Can I come back to work?"
Does anyone know when his dementia set in, and how that overlaps with the timeline of investigation/prosecution?
but it is the urban wayPersonally I'll be keeping any cynicism directed at how solicitors etc attempt to use things like dementia, and not much towards the question of whether he has dementia at all.
I have no problem believing he has dementia, especially as I think I saw footage of him from some years back where it already seemed like he was starting to unravel around the edges. I doubt I'll go looking for it though because I'm not going to play the armchair diagnostics game on this one.
Yeah, absolutely (my Dad's just gone through a similar process. 2 years ago he could sign things for himself, now he can't, but it would be hard to say when he crossed the line). It's just there's an obvious suspicion his mental capability has fluctuated depending on whether he wanted to remain a Lord versus wanting to avoid facing the beak.to be fair it's not like senility or dementia sets in the moment the diagnosis is made, is it. there is some time before mental incapacity is complete.
but it is the urban way
That's a reasonable idea. Not pages but posts. Of course, posters still have the ability to go back and clean up their own self-important shit. My patience is very thin with regard to this thread and I'm more in a hammer mood than a shovel mood tbh.Any chance of a mass delete? we'd only lose half a dozen meaningful posts if you just scrubbed the last 5 pages.
Yes, I am (mischaracterising it) - deliberately, to be honest. I was so pissed off that around the time they announced he wouldn't be prosecuted due to mental incapacity it turned out he had personally written to the Lords asking for a leave of absence. It's a minor point - and what I wrote was factually incorrect. However, the implication was he was making a conscious and capable choice to remain in the Lords (even if on leave of absence), at the very point his incapability was being given as the reason to keep him out of court.Please post a link regarding what you are referring to with that last entry on your timeline as my memory tells me you are mischaracterising that one but I could be wrong.
it shows a good spiritCheers for the confirmation and the honesty.