The Pale King said:Leon Brittan named as a possible abuser in parliament by Labour MP Jimmy Hood:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...uiry-former-Home-Secretary-named-Commons.html
Daily Mail said:The remarks from Jim Hood, who said there were ‘reports about child abuse being linked with’ the Conservative politician, were criticised as ‘disgusting’ by business minister Matthew Hancock.
Quartz said:Yes, the remarks are indeed disgusting, and that's why they should be investigated.
Have a think about why the use, or even misuse, of Parliamentary privilege might be the ONLY way, sometimes, to bring widely-rumoured stuff to peoples' attention.
Then people start to have the opportunity to assess the credibility, or not, for themselves.
freespirit said:think you've misread that post William.
Quartz said:I'm sorry but you'll have to indulge me and explain
They will need to get a foreigner in, anyone else will stink of the establishment that covered up the abuseWoolf steps down: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29855265
Woolf steps down: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-29855265
What is she saying? That by being a part of the establishment you're bound to be friends with many paedophiles?She 'jokes' just now, on R4, that only a "hermit" could fulfil her former role. FFS
She 'jokes' just now, on R4, that only a "hermit" could fulfil her former role. FFS
To lose one chair is a misfortune, two is carelessness ....Oscar Wilde still relevant
Honestly, I think they do get it...all too well. They know what the stakes are here.It will happen if you appoint enquiry chairs to solve your problems (those of increasing mistrust and political illegitimacy), rather than address the actual problems of abuse; like Woolf and Butler-Sloss, the government just don't get it.
Cheers - Louis MacNeice
Maybe it's time to let an external body in? Irish state? Or Belgium?
Just heard...
OK. I was thinking that you were agreeing with Michael Hancock who was quoted (approvingly?) by the Daily Mail in finding Jim Hood's remarks 'disgusting' -- was I wrong?
So I decided to go out on a limb and defend Jim Hood's use of parliamentary privilege there. That was all I was doing really, for the reason I gave -- sometimes it can be the only way to get widely known rumours out.
So, the Tories pick 2 chairs from the establishment to chair an enquiry into claims of an establishment cover up of child abuse
#seemslegit
Maybe it's time to let an external body in? Irish state? Or Belgium?
Dear Home Secretary,
We are writing to ask you to set up a full, properly resourced investigation into the failure of the Police to follow the evidence in a number of historical cases of child sexual abuse."
Is that the fires of Hell in the background? If that isn't the face of evil what the fuck is.
At the very least, he'll have a stage army of Harley St docs ready to testify his heart/dementia/A N Other Condition make it impossible for the police to interview him. Maybe he'll be able to sign up Janner's team for half price now their work is done.He's going to be found dead soon, isn't he?
He's going to be found dead soon, isn't he?
Yeah, sure they'd be able to find someone far flung who will never have broken bread with the nonce ministers...but we shouldn't expect an imported elite, establishment figure to be any less likely to steer the enquiry away from elite crimes than their sister/friend attempts so far. It's only since the victim's groups have started mentioning folk like Mansfield etc. that the rattled elite have come up with the wheeze of a elite from somewhere else.Let's have a commonwealth jurist in who won't rest until we touch the bottom of this swamp.