How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

[Favelado]

Nowt at all in today's Telegraph.

 

[Dillinger4]

isgp archive

 

[quiquaquo]

They are tweeting this:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Attempts to hack our phones, brazen surveillance of one of our reporters, site mostly down since publishing Dolphin Square. Quite a week.</p>&mdash; ExaroNews (@ExaroNews) <a href="">July 13, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

They're brave, someone could easily end up dead over this.

 

[Bernie Gunther]

Exaro appear to be hosted by amazon aws (ie a cloud service with masses of spare capacity) so rather unlikely that they could be flattened by genuine demand without amazon asking if they want to be scaled up to meet it.

http://whatmyip.co/info/whois/54.229.226.155/k/2886291465/website/exaronews.com

 

[quiquaquo]

Exaro appear to be hosted by amazon aws (ie a cloud service with masses of spare capacity) so rather unlikely that they could be flattened by genuine demand without amazon asking if they want to be scaled up to meet it.

http://whatmyip.co/info/whois/54.229.226.155/k/2886291465/website/exaronews.com

Is this the article? http://webcache.googleusercontent.c...ps-threw-parties-for-sexual-abuse-of-children

From: https://twitter.com/search?q=exaronews&src=typd

 

[teqniq]

Dos attack or something more sophisticated?

 

[brogdale]

Must be "getting warmer" for the spooks to take so much interest in them. Well done Exaro.

 

[Bernie Gunther]

Or less sophisticated "Hi, this is MI5, please take Exaronews down right now for reasons of state. "

 

[teqniq]

Or less sophisticated "Hi, this is MI5, please take Exaronews down right now for reasons of state. "

haha yes But by sophisticated I mean something beyond the means of us mere proles, even if it is the IT equivalent of a Big Switch.

 

[Dillinger4]

There is nothing sophisticated about the result.

 

[quiquaquo]

Does this go higher than mere politicians?

 

[Dillinger4]

Does this go higher than mere politicians?

Yes.

 

[teqniq]

Just in case the Google webcache gets removed, here is the Exaro article on freezepage

http://www.freezepage.com/1405248690SHZKYBWTDA

 

[quiquaquo]

Yes.

Thanks, thought I was being paranoid. The new legislation being proposed today made me think along those lines.

 

[quiquaquo]

From many years ago:

A fortnight ago, an assistant chief constable of Hampshire Police stopped the prosecution of Lady Justice Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, after she blinded her son’s nanny in a car accident. In what was doubtless an effort to assure us of their impartiality, the police explained that cases which involved ‘anyone high profile’ were routinely handled by senior, rather than junior officers, thus neatly confirming that there is one law for the powerful and another for the powerless.

http://www.monbiot.com/1998/11/19/inequality-before-the-law/

 

[laptop]

Exaro appear to be hosted by amazon aws (ie a cloud service with masses of spare capacity) so rather unlikely that they could be flattened by genuine demand without amazon asking if they want to be scaled up to meet it.

http://whatmyip.co/info/whois/54.229.226.155/k/2886291465/website/exaronews.com

So some kind of DNS poisoning so requests never get to the server is a possibility.

Name registration is at webfusion.com

 

[brogdale]

Nowt at all in today's Telegraph.

So, aside from Trinity Mirror taking on the Exaro stuff, is it reasonable to see some of this as Murdoch enjoying the dish cold?
(Apologies if already covered, but I'm out of UK atm)

 

[Barking_Mad]

Now I get an answer to my question of why Boris ordered water cannons.

 

[teqniq]

there's definitely more than a hint of the Revenge of the Dirty Digger

 

[Dillinger4]

So, aside from Trinity Mirror taking on the Exaro stuff, is it reasonable to see some of this as Murdoch enjoying the dish cold?
(Apologies if already covered, but I'm out of UK atm)

That is something I have been wondering as well. It is complete speculation, but I have a suspicion that these revelations, their timing, having something to do with phone hacking and the subsequent trial.

Again that is pure speculation.

 

[Favelado]

There is this actually but a long way down the headlines and I couldn't see it a few hours ago.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...work-ignored-because-there-were-too-many.html

 

[brogdale]

That is something I have been wondering as well. It is complete speculation, but I have a suspicion that these revelations, their timing, having something to do with phone hacking and the subsequent trial.

Again that is pure speculation.

Gotta wonder what the old fucker would have done if they hadn't let Becks off?

 

[laptop]

http://whatmyip.co/info/whois/54.229.226.155/k/2886291465/website/exaronews.com

Blimey. One of my sites gets 50% more visits than Exaro, according to that.

E2A: and urban75.net (mostly the boards, I think) four times as many.

 

[free spirit]

The direct IP for exaro is still working

http://54.229.226.155/

So this is not a DDOS attack, or overload, someone is blocking the redirect from the URL to the IP address.

 

[Dillinger4]

 

[Betsy]

From many years ago:

A fortnight ago, an assistant chief constable of Hampshire Police stopped the prosecution of Lady Justice Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, after she blinded her son’s nanny in a car accident. In what was doubtless an effort to assure us of their impartiality, the police explained that cases which involved ‘anyone high profile’ were routinely handled by senior, rather than junior officers, thus neatly confirming that there is one law for the powerful and another for the powerless.

http://www.monbiot.com/1998/11/19/inequality-before-the-law/

That article is from 1998 so I'm a little confused about the "her son's nanny" bit.

Elizabeth Butler -Schloss is 80 which would have made her around 64 when that article was written and her youngest son born in 1967 would have been around 31!

Even if she and the nanny remained friends it still seems rather an odd thing to say.

Perhaps I'm missing something.

I am fuming about this part of the article ...

"In what was doubtless an effort to assure us of their impartiality, the police explained that cases which involved ‘anyone high profile’ were routinely handled by senior, rather than junior officers, thus neatly confirming that there is one law for the powerful and another for the powerless."

 

[butchersapron]

The nanny was employed by her son, not as a nanny for him.

 

[quiquaquo]

That article is from 1998 so I'm a little confused about the "her son's nanny" bit.

Elizabeth Butler -Schloss is 80 which would have made her around 64 when that article was written and her youngest son born in 1967 would have been around 31!

Even if she and the nanny remained friends it still seems rather an odd thing to say.

Perhaps I'm missing something.

I am fuming about this part of the article ...

"In what was doubtless an effort to assure us of their impartiality, the police explained that cases which involved ‘anyone high profile’ were routinely handled by senior, rather than junior officers, thus neatly confirming that there is one law for the powerful and another for the powerless."

Presumed by her son's nanny it meant the nanny of her son's children? Same words but different meaning

 

[Dillinger4]

Having a nanny as an adult is not unusual for some. Especially if she is very strict.

 

[Betsy]

The nanny was employed by her son, not as a nanny for him.

Presumed by her son's nanny it meant the nanny of her son's children? Same words but different meaning

Thanks to you both - could have been put better.