Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

How much evidence is there of long term high level UK paedophile ring?

Wiertz_burial.jpg
 
Is it really any surprise that most of Thatcher's cabinet deserved long sentences in the 'beast' wing at Belmarsh and that she actively facilitated child rape among her cronies?

After all the victims were merely care home oiks and the abusers were the 'right sort of people' by her standards.

Letting them rape little kids (as long as they were oiks) is a natural expression of everything that she stood for.
 
Last edited:
Is it really any surprise that most of Thatcher's cabinet deserved long sentences in the 'beast' wing at Belmarsh and that she actively facilitated child rape among her cronies?

After all the victims were merely care home oiks and the abusers were the 'right sort of people' by her standards. That sort of thing is a natural expression of everything that she stood for.
51wQKX%2B7fVL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU02_.jpg

i wonder who 'us' were
 
Letter to the P.M. from Mark Reckless about whips and child abuse.

"How can we hope to get to the bottom of what was known within 'the establishment' about historic child abuse,if you purport to be unaware of how whips keep and use information to help secure government business?"
Full letter...

markreckless.com/2014/07/12/my-letter-to-pm-on-whips-and-child-abuse-inquiry/
 
she's lucky she died after savile or he'd have had his way with her in the mortuary

I was thinking that. That would have been his ultimate conquest wouldn't it the dirty bastard. He might have done his dead mum. We'll never know for sure but it seems possible seeing as he had access and an Oedipus problem.
 
I'm just musing on the pathway to any kind of prosecution (ignoring these pointless inquiries). Within the '20 names', of those still living, there must be a handful of well corroborated, robust potential cases, some of which will have already been reported to police 20 years ago. Has anything been re-presented to the police? By solicitors acting for survivors? Will Danczuk or Watson actually name anyone, again, they will have the same info and are being fed/are feeding journos? Even after the McAlpine fiasco, there must also be legally less risky ways for the papers to name someone, perhaps simply mentioning that they were previously interviewed or cautioned by police.
 
Back
Top Bottom