8ball
Decolonise colons!
Theres no real proof god doesnt exist either
Ouch, that is a damning indictment of how little theists have going for them.
Theres no real proof god doesnt exist either
I think it's a lot wider than that. It's a way of controlling the crowd.Lots of that stuff is at root about controlling sexual behaviour and limiting the expression of sexuality.
The various religious eating codes are a bit of a separate thing - with their origins in something pretty sensible, providing a guide to what was dangerous to eat at the time the religions were forming.
Well you are right in that both are looking to persuade potential followers.I think he can be as bad as the religious fundamentalists at times tbh.
I think it's a lot wider than that. It's a way of controlling the crowd.
OK, suppose I say that there is a green teapot in orbit around Saturn. You can't disprove it, and nor should you. If I say that, it's up to me to prove it. So it's up to those who believe in some god or another to prove it, not up to the rest of us to disprove it.
Its not though. The idea of a creator is not provable. But its quite possible.
Indeed.
"Here's how it happened: About five thousand years ago, a bunch of religious and political hustlers got together to figure out how they could control people and keep them in line. They knew people were basically stupid and would believe anything they were told,so these guys announced that God— God personally—had given one of them a list of Ten Commandments that he wanted everyone to follow. They claimed the whole thing took place on a mountaintop, when no one else was around."
Its not though. The idea of a creator is not provable. But its quite possible.
There's no data to say such a thing is possible or not, just heaps of it pointing in the 'vanishingly unlikely' direction.
What is vanishingly unlikely about it? (that is the possibility of a creator of some sort)
I mean there is no data about possibility or otherwise. By most definitions of God the idea is meaningless.
By creator 'of some sort', do you have something in mind other than the one I briefly mentioned above?
...you went on to say there was 'heaps of it' (evidence I took you to mean) pointing in the no possibility of a creator direction.
No, I meant there is heaps of evidence pointing in the direction of it being highly unlikely the wanking-obsessed comfort-blanket version of a creator exists.
Your definition of a creator is sufficiently hollowed-out to be of no consequence or interest, which is why there are no religions based on such a thing.
Are you going to feel cut adrift if you abandon religion? The way you're talking sounds to me like you still believe in god but you're in a bit of a strop with him.
well it is if you make a thing of it and stridently decry other peoples faiths. Just don't believe in god. I don't either. But to make a fetish of your moral superiority for not believing and call several billion people mugs? Have a word with yourself.Oh the old "atheism is just another religion" argument LOL
well it is if you make a thing of it and stridently decry other peoples faiths. Just don't believe in god. I don't either. But to make a fetish of your moral superiority for not believing and call several billion people mugs? Have a word with yourself.
I find it hilarious that you use a cherokee parable to illustrate your point. Heres an old zen buddhist one:The problem with having an imaginary supreme being in charge of everything that can't communicate what it wants is that people can project their own wants as being God's will and justify anything through it.
They have oil, we don't, we are god's chosen so surely its God's will we take their oil and its God's will that they die if they don't let us take it without a fight.
God made us, i'm having murderous thoughts, it must be God's will that i have these thoughts.
If the devil existed and wanted us to do evil he'd very likely invent religion.
although saying that:
In the film The Book of Eli the bad guy wants the world's last bible as its such a powerful tool. Tools are just tools though. They aren't inheritantly good or evil. A woodworking tool can be used to make a baby's crib or longbow and arrows for war. Its the hearts of men that are the issue and how they use the tools of this world.
One evening an old Cherokee told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside people. He said, "My son, the battle is between 2 "wolves" inside us all.
One is Evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.
The other is Good. It is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith."
The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather: "Which wolf wins?"
The old Cherokee simply replied, "The one you feed.
This is widely believed but there is no real evidence to support it, in the case of biblical proscriptions at least. Pork was no more 'dangerous' than other meats.The various religious eating codes are a bit of a separate thing - with their origins in something pretty sensible, providing a guide to what was dangerous to eat at the time the religions were forming.
OK. That isn't what you said but we'll move on if you like.
How is there being a conscious deliberate creator of the universe 'of no interest'? I think its of huge interest personally.
I am fairly open minded on it tbf and my views will prob change one way or another in a few months
It's funny, the older I get I generally find I'm more tolerant of most views, but religion is going the other way. If someone tells me they believe in a god of some sort I can't help but be disappointed.
I'm friends with several Tories. It makes for good debate if nothing else. But I can't think of anyone in my social circle who is a believer.Even compared to telling you they're a Tory?
I'm friends with several Tories. It makes for good debate if nothing else. But I can't think of anyone in my social circle who is a believer.