Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

God and religion

Lots of that stuff is at root about controlling sexual behaviour and limiting the expression of sexuality.

The various religious eating codes are a bit of a separate thing - with their origins in something pretty sensible, providing a guide to what was dangerous to eat at the time the religions were forming.
I think it's a lot wider than that. It's a way of controlling the crowd.
 
I think he can be as bad as the religious fundamentalists at times tbh.
Well you are right in that both are looking to persuade potential followers.

Perhaps I should be more pushy, but I tend to be tolerant, even of intolerant people!

:)
 
OK, suppose I say that there is a green teapot in orbit around Saturn. You can't disprove it, and nor should you. If I say that, it's up to me to prove it. So it's up to those who believe in some god or another to prove it, not up to the rest of us to disprove it.

Its not though. The idea of a creator is not provable. But its quite possible.
 
Its not though. The idea of a creator is not provable. But its quite possible.

I think he is talking about the concept of burden of proof. As in if you are making a claim, the burden of proof is on you, rather than your detractors to prove you wrong.
 
Its not though. The idea of a creator is not provable. But its quite possible.

There's no data to say such a thing is possible or not, just heaps of it pointing in the 'vanishingly unlikely' direction.

But nevertheless, there are an infinite number of potential concepts of 'creator' that have nothing to do with a nonfalsifiable comfort blanket that is always watching you wanking.
 
What is vanishingly unlikely about it? (that is the possibility of a creator of some sort)

I mean there is no data about possibility or otherwise. By most definitions of God the idea is meaningless.

By creator 'of some sort', do you have something in mind other than the one I briefly mentioned above?
For instance, we could posit the idea of a creator that creates a universe that looks to its inhabitants exactly like a creatorless universe.
 
Last edited:
I mean there is no data about possibility or otherwise. By most definitions of God the idea is meaningless.

This is true I think. But you went on to say there was 'heaps of it' (evidence I took you to mean) pointing in the no possibility of a creator direction.

By creator 'of some sort', do you have something in mind other than the one I briefly mentioned above?

Some conscious deliberate action which started the universe by some thing which I'll not speculate on.
 
...you went on to say there was 'heaps of it' (evidence I took you to mean) pointing in the no possibility of a creator direction.

No, I meant there is heaps of evidence pointing in the direction of it being highly unlikely the wanking-obsessed comfort-blanket version of a creator exists.

Your definition of a creator is sufficiently hollowed-out to be of no consequence or interest, which is why there are no religions based on such a thing.
 
No, I meant there is heaps of evidence pointing in the direction of it being highly unlikely the wanking-obsessed comfort-blanket version of a creator exists.

OK. That isn't what you said but we'll move on if you like.

Your definition of a creator is sufficiently hollowed-out to be of no consequence or interest, which is why there are no religions based on such a thing.

How is there being a conscious deliberate creator of the universe 'of no interest'? I think its of huge interest personally.
 
As an atheist I would like that more people shared my view, many soft Christians are content that I have this view and are not interested in converting me, and the ones that want to convert me are only a minor irritation easily swatted away.

Then there are the fundamentalists of the various religions and they are more of an issue not personally for me but for peace around the world. To people like Dawkins they are perhaps the priority, but there is no way easily to convince them the flaws in their beliefs.

So what is a British atheist to do? Do I just mosey along content in my beliefs or do I make effort to try to convince believers the error of their ways?

In my current situation, the crocodile nearest the canoe is rather more mundane things like keeping a roof over my head so I can't see myself investing any time or effort on persuading believers that their views are bunkum.
 
Last edited:
I personally find this "I get/got lots of comfort from" argument very strange. It's like the religious person acknowledges that their belief is subjective, but the fact that it gives them some mental balm is some sort of trump card for being religious. It's very well documented that religion provides comfort to people who believe and I don't dispute that, but why do religious people keep using it as an argument to me? It's like they want me to pretend. I can't.

Froggy, to be honest, I was shocked when I first read on here that you believed in god. But I learned one interesting thing from reading your posts on the subject, and that was that religious belief doesn't require absolute certainty - there's an element of hope in it, and to use the cliched term, faith. That concept made me see religious people in a more nuanced way. You are still the same person, whether there is a god there or not. There isn't by the way! (I'm only messing, your relationship with god can survive this crisis, or alternatively you can survive the transition to no god - don't feel bereft).
 
Are you going to feel cut adrift if you abandon religion? The way you're talking sounds to me like you still believe in god but you're in a bit of a strop with him.

Tbh, i dunno, maybe. I feel fairly relaxed. Im not massively involved atm bar going to the odd thing, thats the thing this time i feel a lot more relaxed about it than the last time i stopped believing. Maybe because ive had all sorts of real life stress ive handled myself without relying on religion. I also feel a lot better about solely doing a lot of these things as theyre part of my culture. Dunno, tho. Its hard for me to admit i dont believe it at all, bit hard to answer that.
 
well it is if you make a thing of it and stridently decry other peoples faiths. Just don't believe in god. I don't either. But to make a fetish of your moral superiority for not believing and call several billion people mugs? Have a word with yourself.

This is what I was trying to convey regarding my comments on Dawkins.
 
The problem with having an imaginary supreme being in charge of everything that can't communicate what it wants is that people can project their own wants as being God's will and justify anything through it.

They have oil, we don't, we are god's chosen so surely its God's will we take their oil and its God's will that they die if they don't let us take it without a fight.
God made us, i'm having murderous thoughts, it must be God's will that i have these thoughts.

If the devil existed and wanted us to do evil he'd very likely invent religion.

although saying that:
In the film The Book of Eli the bad guy wants the world's last bible as its such a powerful tool. Tools are just tools though. They aren't inheritantly good or evil. A woodworking tool can be used to make a baby's crib or longbow and arrows for war. Its the hearts of men that are the issue and how they use the tools of this world.

One evening an old Cherokee told his grandson about a battle that goes on inside people. He said, "My son, the battle is between 2 "wolves" inside us all.

One is Evil. It is anger, envy, jealousy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.

The other is Good. It is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith."

The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather: "Which wolf wins?"

The old Cherokee simply replied, "The one you feed.
I find it hilarious that you use a cherokee parable to illustrate your point. Heres an old zen buddhist one:

a man seeking wisdom came to the wise man of the mountain. The wise man told him- go and sit below the dung chute of the nearest palace for three days.

The man did as the wise elder had told him then came back to ask 'elder, what have I learned?'

'you've got shit on your head'
 
My ideal would be to move to a world where religion is declawed, where other rights are put before any controversial aspect - circumcision, abortion, treatment of animals... Interesting to see Islam attracts the most criticism, but in Latin America we still have this bullshit. http://www.channel4.com/news/latin-americas-abortion-shame

Interesting that religion is a protected characteristic, when so many actually need protected from religion.

Obv not feeling the Sunday religious vibes. :D
 
The various religious eating codes are a bit of a separate thing - with their origins in something pretty sensible, providing a guide to what was dangerous to eat at the time the religions were forming.
This is widely believed but there is no real evidence to support it, in the case of biblical proscriptions at least. Pork was no more 'dangerous' than other meats.
 
OK. That isn't what you said but we'll move on if you like.

Ah, I see where that slightly ambiguous comma may have been confusing...

How is there being a conscious deliberate creator of the universe 'of no interest'? I think its of huge interest personally.

No value or interest unless you give some more content to the concept.

As it is, it seems likely that such a 'creator' will never be of any relevance to any human lives since humans will have been and gone well before it gets to gathering the data from its little simulation, and in any case there would be a myriad of potential purposes for its experiment that have no bearing on whether some some clusters have some galaxies with some stars with some congealed dust around them that go a bit mouldy after a few zillion processor cycles.
 
I'm friends with several Tories. It makes for good debate if nothing else. But I can't think of anyone in my social circle who is a believer.

Maybe they just shut up about it when you are around.

I have several friends who used to be believers - it made for some good debate for a long time but they conceded defeat in the end. ;)
 
Back
Top Bottom