Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

God and religion

it really doesn't have to be complex - people believe in silly things on the basis of 'faith', that is the main issue
It's one of the least salient issues in the production and practise of religion. The fact that the particular things believed vary widely over time and across cultures ought to tell you that.
 
It's one of the least salient issues in the production and practise of religion. The fact that the particular things believed vary widely over time and across cultures ought to tell you that.

it is kind of fundamental, the particular irrational belief isn't particularly relevant
 
it is kind of fundamental, the particular irrational belief isn't particularly relevant
No, that's just a dim failure to see.past the obvious. If Christianity goes from Jewish heresy to slave love-cult to state religion of the empire one of the least interesting things to say is it's a series of outbreaks of irrational belief.
 
No, that's just a dim failure to see.past the obvious. If Christianity goes from Jewish heresy to slave love-cult to state religion of the empire one of the least interesting things to say is it's a series of outbreaks of irrational belief.

that isn't what I'm saying - of course that is interesting from a historical perspective, I'm talking about being dismissive of religion though

the argument doesn't need to be deeply theological as objected to by a previous poster, nor does whether it is 'interesting' have any relevance
 
that isn't what I'm saying - of course that is interesting from a historical perspective, I'm talking about being dismissive of religion though
It remains interesting to me that it has the various social functions today even somewhere like the UK where we have universal education in the sciences. I've never believed but seems pointless to dismiss it as just irrational.
 
It remains interesting to me that it has the various social functions today even somewhere like the UK where we have universal education in the sciences.

That can be interesting, sure. But not really relevant to the point I was making.

I've never believed but seems pointless to dismiss it as just irrational.

Why? Surely blind faith is inherently irrational regardless of any rational arguments you can make within the confines of that faith.
 
That can be interesting, sure. But not really relevant to the point I was making.



Why? Surely blind faith is inherently irrational regardless of any rational arguments you can make within the confines of that faith.
I think for a lot of.people I've met it's not the most unreasonable response to the shortcomings of modernity would be one thing. Often beats a lot of the rational materialist selfishness, for example.
 
Being not the most unreasonable response doesn't negate the reality that the underlying belief is irrational.
 
Being not the most unreasonable response doesn't negate the reality that the underlying belief is irrational.
Even there things like wanting life to be more than this or a moral code don't seem silly to me though I'd agree they don't actually need a theological basis.
 
There are also Christian Scientists. Something no-one should be happy about.
Though I did have a mate whose vegan punk band scheduled their tour of America to take take advantage of CS all-you-can-eat veggie buffets.
ETA Bollocks, no that's some other lot. Seventh Day Adventists maybe?
 
They've got a little book shop and drop in center round the corner from where a mate used to live in N'pton. Never quite been sure what their deal is, don't care enough to google for it. Never saw anyone going in or out though.
 
Though I did have a mate whose vegan punk band scheduled their tour of America to take take advantage of CS all-you-can-eat veggie buffets.
ETA Bollocks, no that's some other lot. Seventh Day Adventists maybe?

The 7DA's certainly are veggies - and some of the longest-lived (and best studied for that) people on the planet.
 
If you're saying that christians don't follow the teachings of the bible then I agree. If you're saying that christians interpret the bible to fit in with the current cultural climate then I'd agree too, in some degree, except for the RCC in some respects. Just what do christians believe then, the latest issue?

You seem to think it's wrong that Christians don't follow the Jewish law.
 
Ive been tempted to go to my local church because I know many of them will completely disaprove of my mere existence and I'd be interested to see what happens.

I enjoy the spectacle of worship even though I know in my every being that there is no God. But given that, doing church can't hurt anyone or anything.

Anyway - I've been too busy so it's never happened.

In my old age I've begun to have sympathy for people with religion - whilst not in the least changing my views about the non existence of God. But I do feel now that not all religious people are automatically bad, and I have a level of acceptance now that I never had as a young person, unless religion is used as a shield for bigots to hide behind, as it so often is.
 
You seem to think it's wrong that Christians don't follow the Jewish law.
It's the selective quoting of biblical passages in support of a position that I object to, which is why I quoted the Levicutus passage about shellfish. Some people quote the same book to justify prejudice against gay people.
 
It's the selective quoting of biblical passages in support of a position that I object to, which is why I quoted the Levicutus passage about shellfish. Some people quote the same book to justify prejudice against gay people.

I understand what you're saying, but why would the Jewish dietary and other laws have to be obeyed by non-Jews?
 
It's the selective quoting of biblical passages in support of a position that I object to, which is why I quoted the Levicutus passage about shellfish. Some people quote the same book to justify prejudice against gay people.
You still don't get what the bible is. Your insistence that it is what you think it is is mental.
 
If Christians had to follow Jewish laws surely all men would be circumcised as babies.
This following of Jewish law was dismissed for Gentiles by St Paul, a man, whose fervent evangelising was about spreading the word rather than being traditionalist.
 
But the religion IS selective about the OT.
It's still bolted on to the Roman Jesus bits because it supposedly prophesises the Messiah - albeit a married Rabbi ... and an actual King of the Jews...

And overall it gives a stamp of authority to the Jesus myths.
And Jesus is made to say that the old law stands.
 
Back
Top Bottom