gentlegreen
I hummus, therefore I am ...
.
Dawkins has made a bit of an arse of himself going after the clock maker, he seems to have missed out judgement wise with it.Reading this thread makes me ashamed to be an atheist.
And this:
We can save atheism from the New Atheists like Richard Dawkins | Jeff Sparrow
No shit SherlockDawkins has made a bit of an arse of himself going after the clock maker, he seems to have missed out judgement wise with it.
It's one of the least salient issues in the production and practise of religion. The fact that the particular things believed vary widely over time and across cultures ought to tell you that.it really doesn't have to be complex - people believe in silly things on the basis of 'faith', that is the main issue
It's one of the least salient issues in the production and practise of religion. The fact that the particular things believed vary widely over time and across cultures ought to tell you that.
No, that's just a dim failure to see.past the obvious. If Christianity goes from Jewish heresy to slave love-cult to state religion of the empire one of the least interesting things to say is it's a series of outbreaks of irrational belief.it is kind of fundamental, the particular irrational belief isn't particularly relevant
No, that's just a dim failure to see.past the obvious. If Christianity goes from Jewish heresy to slave love-cult to state religion of the empire one of the least interesting things to say is it's a series of outbreaks of irrational belief.
It remains interesting to me that it has the various social functions today even somewhere like the UK where we have universal education in the sciences. I've never believed but seems pointless to dismiss it as just irrational.that isn't what I'm saying - of course that is interesting from a historical perspective, I'm talking about being dismissive of religion though
It remains interesting to me that it has the various social functions today even somewhere like the UK where we have universal education in the sciences.
I've never believed but seems pointless to dismiss it as just irrational.
I think for a lot of.people I've met it's not the most unreasonable response to the shortcomings of modernity would be one thing. Often beats a lot of the rational materialist selfishness, for example.That can be interesting, sure. But not really relevant to the point I was making.
Why? Surely blind faith is inherently irrational regardless of any rational arguments you can make within the confines of that faith.
Even there things like wanting life to be more than this or a moral code don't seem silly to me though I'd agree they don't actually need a theological basis.Being not the most unreasonable response doesn't negate the reality that the underlying belief is irrational.
Indeed, there are Christian scientists, something my dad used to be happy about.
Though I did have a mate whose vegan punk band scheduled their tour of America to take take advantage of CS all-you-can-eat veggie buffets.There are also Christian Scientists. Something no-one should be happy about.
Though I did have a mate whose vegan punk band scheduled their tour of America to take take advantage of CS all-you-can-eat veggie buffets.
ETA Bollocks, no that's some other lot. Seventh Day Adventists maybe?
If you're saying that christians don't follow the teachings of the bible then I agree. If you're saying that christians interpret the bible to fit in with the current cultural climate then I'd agree too, in some degree, except for the RCC in some respects. Just what do christians believe then, the latest issue?
What is it with atheists and their superiority complex?
It's the selective quoting of biblical passages in support of a position that I object to, which is why I quoted the Levicutus passage about shellfish. Some people quote the same book to justify prejudice against gay people.You seem to think it's wrong that Christians don't follow the Jewish law.
It's the selective quoting of biblical passages in support of a position that I object to, which is why I quoted the Levicutus passage about shellfish. Some people quote the same book to justify prejudice against gay people.
You still don't get what the bible is. Your insistence that it is what you think it is is mental.It's the selective quoting of biblical passages in support of a position that I object to, which is why I quoted the Levicutus passage about shellfish. Some people quote the same book to justify prejudice against gay people.
as well as being a misogynist pigIf Christians had to follow Jewish laws surely all men would be circumcised as babies.
This following of Jewish law was dismissed for Gentiles by St Paul, a man, whose fervent evangelising was about spreading the word rather than being traditionalist.
jesus weptIt's the selective quoting of biblical passages in support of a position that I object to, which is why I quoted the Levicutus passage about shellfish. Some people quote the same book to justify prejudice against gay people.
as well as being a misogynist pig
so do we all, sprocket., so do we allHe had trouble getting to Damascus too!