Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Fate of EU citizens in the UK post Brexit

What if they didn't/don't?
In this case, they would certainly as they were automatically issued to children resident in the UK six months before their sixteenth birthday and I know nobody who moved here as an adult who didn't apply for one.
 
In this case, they would certainly as they were automatically issued to children resident in the UK six months before their sixteenth birthday and I know nobody who moved here as an adult who didn't apply for one.

That's this case. What about everyone who's arrived after their 16th birthday and not yet worked?

It makes perfect sense to bestow a status based on an application.
 
That's this case. What about everyone who's arrived after their 16th birthday and not yet worked?

It makes perfect sense to bestow a status based on an application.
If they've not worked legally and are not claiming benefits, they would fly under the radar both before and after BREXIT. If they've never worked and, excluding other extenuating circumstances, try to claim benefit, even under EU law they could be deported. to prevent you from becoming a burden on the state.
 
If they've not worked legally and are not claiming benefits, they would fly under the radar both before and after BREXIT. If they've never worked and, excluding other extenuating circumstances, try to claim benefit, even under EU law they could be deported. to prevent you from becoming a burden on the state.

The point is for them not to go unnoticed for their sakes as much as any other. The way to do that is to issue a status to those who apply for it so they have something to show potential employers, benefits people, landlords, etc, that differentiates them from someone who arrived this year unless they pass the new requirements. Exactly the same as it works for foreigners in any other non-EU country. What you're suggesting makes no sense.
 
I know. So what? We’re discussing how to generally issue leave to remain.
No, we're discussing a situation specific to Brexit, where people are being asked to take action to safeguard a right to to live in the country that they already have, and have had for decades in some cases.
 
Just 2% of all applications for the settlement scheme were submitted by people aged over 65, a percentage that is unlikely to reflect the population of older EU nationals living in the UK. Charities supporting older Europeans to apply said they had “encountered many individuals who have no mobile phone, no digital access and inappropriate or no documentation”, and the report warned that people who struggled with the digital technology required to apply were more likely to have missed the deadline for applications at the end of last month.

The House of Lords European affairs committee report called on the government to ensure that support remained in place to help late applicants secure their status.

“The fact that only 2% of applicants are aged over 65 suggests older people may have been missed or simply couldn’t apply by the deadline. These people need more comprehensive legal safeguards to ensure late applications do not count against them securing their rights to remain here,” Lord Kinnoull, the chair of the committee, said. The Citizens’ Rights report noted particular concern for Italian nationals who had emigrated to Britain after the second world war.

eta: here's the report
 
Last edited:

That doesn't mean they need to "do nothing".

It refers to EU citizens "lawfully resident in the UK", so obviously their lawful status would have to be proven. It's like saying anyone passing a driving test will automatically be granted a licence. They'd still have to apply for it and show they passed the test. And again, there were huge campaigns, TV and press, before Brexit telling them what they needed to do (it wasn't nothing). Over 5 million EU citizens have successfully applied and been granted settled or pre-settled status,. They all got the message just fine so nobody has been blindsided here.
 
Last edited:
The government website which lists what kind of evidence they will and won't accept from people trying to prove that they've been resident here for the required length of time includes this little list of things which are not allowed.

Screenshot 2021-07-24 at 07.19.25.png


that little list is obviously there because of people trying to jump through the required hoops but lacking a filing cabinet containing the correct documents spanning 5 years. :(

Looking at the list, my mum would not i think have been able to prove her right to stay, despite living here for some 35 years.
 
Last edited:
The government website which lists what kind of evidence they will and won't accept from people trying to prove that they've been resident here for the required length of time includes this little list of things which are not allowed.

View attachment 280267


that little list is obviously there because of people trying to jump through the required hoops but lacking a filing cabinet containing the correct documents spanning 5 years. :(

Or more likely that some fucking idiots need it spelled out that letters from family and friends are not official or impartial.
 
Or more likely that some fucking idiots need it spelled out that letters from family and friends are not official or impartial.
You really are being a dick about this.
Not everyone has 5 years worth of official documents with their name and address on them.

eg)

What are they supposed to do, the fucking idiots.
 
Last edited:
That doesn't mean they need to "do nothing".

It refers to EU citizens "lawfully resident in the UK", so obviously their lawful status would have to be proven. It's like saying anyone passing a driving test will automatically be granted a licence. They'd still have to apply for it and show they passed the test. And again, there were huge campaigns, TV and press, before Brexit telling them what they needed to do (it wasn't nothing). Over 5 million EU citizens have successfully applied and been granted settled or pre-settled status,. They all got the message just fine so nobody has been blindsided here.

It's also similar (and perhaps this is a better comparison) to saying anyone who is a British citizen is entitled to a British passport.

You still need to apply for the passport (and provide documentation to demonstrate your entitlement), and you need to keep and use that passport in certain situations to prove your status.

Those who don't possess the appropriate documents, whether that's a passport or leave to remain or anything else, are always likely to have trouble proving their status.

This issue is not unique to the UK, and certainly not to Brexit, and most people recognise that it's a necessary and relatively minor inconvenience rather than a massive issue. For a small number of people in particular situations, it can be a massive issue, but I'm baffled by the tendency of some on this thread to talk as if that's the general picture for everyone.
 
It's also similar (and perhaps this is a better comparison) to saying anyone who is a British citizen is entitled to a British passport.

You still need to apply for the passport (and provide documentation to demonstrate your entitlement), and you need to keep and use that passport in certain situations to prove your status.

Those who don't possess the appropriate documents, whether that's a passport or leave to remain or anything else, are always likely to have trouble proving their status.

This issue is not unique to the UK, and certainly not to Brexit, and most people recognise that it's a necessary and relatively minor inconvenience rather than a massive issue. For a small number of people in particular situations, it can be a massive issue, but I'm baffled by the tendency of some on this thread to talk as if that's the general picture for everyone.
Thats not a great comparison is it because a passport is optional, not having a passport doesn't mean you are here illegally.
 
You really are being a dick about this.
Not everyone has official documents with their name on them. What are they supposed to do, the fucking idiots.

Well you're the one posting silly lists of things that wouldn't be considered evidence by anyone in the world, ever!
 
Well you're the one posting silly lists of things that wouldn't be considered evidence by anyone in the world, ever!
If i was the home office I'd accept postcards, with your name address and a dated stamp on them, if they had the correct documents they'd send those instead wouldnt they.
 
You really are being a dick about this.
Not everyone has 5 years worth of official documents with their name and address on them.

eg)

What are they supposed to do, the fucking idiots.

Just take one example, I've worked at various times for employment agencies and on zero hours contracts.

I was given standard pay slips just the same as anyone who was a permanent employee, including a P60 at the end of the year.

Most people in this situation will be able to prove their employment details just as easily as most people in permanent employment.
 
Just take one example, I've worked at various times for employment agencies and on zero hours contracts.

I was given standard pay slips just the same as anyone who was a permanent employee, including a P60 at the end of the year.

Most people in this situation will be able to prove their employment details just as easily as most people in permanent employment.
Yes. Those people will be fine.
 
Thats not a great comparison is it because a passport is optional, not having a passport doesn't mean you are here illegally.
We're not talking about whether it's optional, we're talking about the process of getting one, and the fact that there needs to be a process.

But if you think it's all too much hassle, then don't bother getting passport or renewing your existing one, and just present a postcard with your name and address on it the next time you need to prove your status. I'm sure that will go well.
 
Last edited:
But if you think it's all too much hassle, then don't bother
I don't think this is what is going on, you know. It's not that people are sending postcards because they're too lazy to get their settled status properly.

Don't know why people are being so weird and aggressive about this.
Yes, the large majority of eligible people will have applied and got their settled / pre-settled status without too much hassle.

There are many who will fall through the cracks though that's all, not because they're lazy or fucking idiots.
For instance am pretty sure my mum if she still lived here would have been one of them, not from laziness just lack of paperwork.

 
I don't think this is what is going on, you know. It's not that people are sending postcards because they're too lazy to get their settled status properly.

Don't know why people are being so weird and aggressive about this.
Yes, the large majority of eligible people will have applied and got their settled / pre-settled status without too much hassle.

There are many who will fall through the cracks though that's all, not because they're lazy or fucking idiots.
For instance am pretty sure my mum if she still lived here would have been one of them, not from laziness just lack of paperwork.

You're the one who's introduced postcards as an appropriate means of demonstrating status, and making comments about people being lazy or fucking idiots.

You're the one whose posts are coming across as weird and aggressive.

Your recent contributions to this thread are pretty ridiculous, TBH.
 
You're the one who's introduced postcards as an appropriate means of demonstrating status, and making comments about people being lazy or fucking idiots.

Your recent contributions to this thread are pretty ridiculous, TBH.
You are the one who said ' if you think it's all too much hassle & don't bother' & spy called the people submitting inadmissable evidence fucking idiots. But ok.
 
You are the one who said ' if you think it's all too much hassle & don't bother' & spy called the people submitting inadmissable evidence fucking idiots. But ok.
My comment about too much hassle was directed specifically at you and your ridiculous suggestion about postcards.

I've already said that I recognise there are some people who have trouble proving their status, but as you've previously posted about travelling abroad eg to visit your parents, I'm making the assumption that you currently have a passport or at least have had one in the past, so that doesn't apply to you.

I'm not arguing that there isn't an issue here for some people, but your posts aren't really helping discuss that in any way.
 
My comment about too much hassle was directed specifically at you and your ridiculous suggestion about postcards.

I've already said that I recognise there are some people who have trouble proving their status, but as you've previously posted about travelling abroad eg to visit your parents, I'm making the assumption that you currently have a passport or at least have had one in the past, so that doesn't apply to you.

I'm not arguing that there isn't an issue here for some people, but your posts aren't really helping discuss that in any way.
Not sure what point you were making then, why on earth would i ever use a postcard to try to get a passport? I am good at this stuff, i have three.
The postcards thing was on the government website, where you go to find the list of what is required for settled status.
Not my idea, just found the list of rejected evidence (scrap books, birthday cards etc) quite moving tbh. And I was not being entirely serious when i said If I was the home office.
 
Back
Top Bottom