littlebabyjesus
one of Maxwell's demons
I doubt that - his IPL form's been awful. More likely to take up a coaching gig, I would have thought. He'll be in high demand.He'll probably do the T20 circuit for a couple more years I'd expect
I doubt that - his IPL form's been awful. More likely to take up a coaching gig, I would have thought. He'll be in high demand.He'll probably do the T20 circuit for a couple more years I'd expect
50 partnership in 39 balls. Remember when a 296 run chase culminating in the afternoon of day 5 was considered a challenge of slow, careful accumulation that prioritised avoiding the loss?
It will. Pant's bang out of form, mind you. Right now, I think India may rather be wishing they'd finished this series last year.Going to be entertaining having Bairstow and Rishabh Pant on opposing teams isn't it.
As a lifelong cricket fan, I've always wondered why test run rates are so slow. Why not just play your natural game... if that's all it took, for McCullum to say 'just hit it' to the batters and 'just pitch it up' to the bowlers, 'i wont hold it against you if you get out or get smashed for a few boundaries', then why did this brainwave take so long to materialise?
You sell your wicket dearly at Test cricket because you've got 5 days, and if you're out slashing for 7 you look pretty stupid when an opposition scores 400+ over a day and a half.
And this will happen. Don't get me wrong, it's been great to watch but England have got away with it. The series turned when Stokes took on Patel and hit him for 22 in 2 overs. But Stokes had an almighty slash at Patel's 5th ball and it missed off stump by an inch. If it had hit, things would probably have turned out completely differently. As it was Williamson got scared and dropped Patel forever from the series.
It won't always miss. Bairstow won't always get dropped early on. This approach will get found out. But here's too some exciting viewing until it does.
For the time being……and off Vaughan fucks again from the BBC…
Ex-England captain Vaughan steps back from BBC work
Former England captain Michael Vaughan says he is stepping back from his work at the BBC.www.bbc.co.uk
It felt pretty perverse having him commentating at Headingly. Hopefully we won’t see the prick again.
For the time being…
Stokes the secret pragmatist
After seven years, the Morgan method is now being applied in Tests. Ben Stokes is, if anything, even more inclined to have a bash. And Brendon “Baz” McCullum, a big influence in the background on his good friend Morgan, is now in the Test dressing room. At Headingley, when England had just treated a target of 296 like a trip to the funfair, Nasser Hussain asked McCullum if he and Stokes were cut from the same cloth. “I’m aggressive,” he replied, “but I reckon he might have me covered!”
The big question now is, can this brave new England keep it up? They are clearly going to try: Stokes has been cheerfully stoking the fire, saying “we’ll go even harder”. But in the field, much like Morgan, Stokes is a secret pragmatist. Matt Potts, his main discovery, is a classic English seamer – right-arm, northern, parsimonious, targeting the top of off-stump. Jack Leach, the hothouse flower benefiting most from the new head gardener, is not naturally attacking: he keeps asking for mid-off to go back. Stokes smiles and says no, possibly because he himself is apt to get caught there – but he prefers the dogged Leach to the more erratic Matt Parkinson. After getting out of a jail called 55-6, England may feel they can do anything with the bat, but they are still fairly sober with the ball.
Giving Ben Foakes the wicketkeeping gloves is another vote for discretion over valour. The logic of Bazball leads to the solution suggested by Kumar Sangakkara, an expert keeper-batter: picking Buttler as an opener, with permission to pummel the ball. The gloves would go to either Buttler or Bairstow, and it wouldn’t matter if Stokes was unfit to bowl, as an all-rounder could replace Foakes at No.7. The choice may well be a defining one.
Foakes isn't faultless as a keeper, but he is better than Buttler or Bairstow, particularly standing up. And he's far from a passenger with the bat. First test, he stayed with Root to see England home from a position that was still pretty dodgy - 120 to win, not much batting to come. Then he shared another century stand with Root to get England up to NZ's first innings total in the second test. Short memories!
Who is lobbying for him at the bbc that got him his job back initially - Agnew?
Agnew got that interview badly wrong, but imo it's evidence of cluelessness more than dodginess. There is a story about him speaking up against racist comments to another player back when he was still a teenager.Not sure. Agnew is certainly dodgy, just listen to him grilling Michael Holding over his support of Black Lives Matter. He retired from commentary shortly afterwards and I don’t blame him.
“Agnew jumped up and said: ‘You shouldn’t be doing this, it’s not on.’ He was playing for Surrey twos, down on trial. Titmus was carrying on in front of everybody and Agnew said: ‘No, no, this is not acceptable.’ He was the only one who stood up.”
Often, the message is subtler, wrapped and swaddled in layers of well-meaning code. “A huge call,” warned Jonathan Agnew. “Morale and camaraderie is a big part in team performance.” Which feels instinctively unarguable - who doesn’t love morale and camaraderie, after all? - until you begin to ask why Archer is deemed such a grave threat to it. And why no other player, foreign-born or not, is ever subjected to the same standard. (“Deserves his call, clearly a good player,” was Agnew’s snap verdict on Ballance’s Ashes call-up in 2013, in case you’re wondering.)
Equally, it’s worth asking why Michael Vaughan - broadly supportive of Archer - nevertheless feels “there are questions about whether he fits into the team culture”, when Archer has displayed no indication of being anything other than a sound, inspirational team-mate.