Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do angry vegans turn you against going vegan?

What he overestimates is how much people actually give a fuck.

Most people know exactly what goes into putting meat on their tables, the processes and suffering involved, and go right ahead and eat it anyway.
Partly that. But I think there is also a part here that conflates horror at industrialised farming processes, and killing processes (I'm glad JR posted about gassing pigs as it made me go away and read up on it), with horror at the idea of killing any animal for food ever. It's clearly not true that day-to-day contact with the death of animals that you know puts tons of people off meat - where it's the social norm and all around you from a young age, the majority grow up socialised that this is the norm and with no problem not only eating meat but killing the animals themselves. I argued earlier that the distance from the process that modern life has engineered if anything produces more distaste and disgust at the idea because, while eating meat may still be the social norm, participating in killing animals isn't.

So then you're reduced to the straw man that meat-eaters think we're 'better' than other animals in some way, which is not necessarily the case at all. That's not my thought process, but if you aren't horrified by the act of killing for food and you don't think 'humans are better than animals', what are you left with?

For one, you're left in the uncomfortable position as an ideological vegan of thinking that you must be superior. Even the most reasonable on here like JR thinks he's more rational than a non-vegan. But wanting to kill animals, or have them killed for you, in order to eat their meat isn't in itself at all irrational. Neither is wanting not to - neither position is irrational.
 
It's not irrationally, but it's certainly a bit weird when you look at the opposition to say fox hunting. I mean I'm all for a spot of class war fair, but I'm faintly bemused by the horror that some people have for it and yet think nothing of supporting or at least accepting other forms of animal cruelty, such as factory farming for their own enjoyment.
 
It's not irrationally, but it's certainly a bit weird when you look at the opposition to say fox hunting. I mean I'm all for a spot of class war fair, but I'm faintly bemused by the horror that some people have for it and yet think nothing of supporting or at least accepting other forms of animal cruelty, such as factory farming for their own enjoyment.
You have a point, however there is also the question of what we might consider a 'death for no reason'. For Morrissey, it is killing animals for food. For others it might not be that, but killing animals for sport might fall in that category. For others still, killing animals for sport isn't a death for no reason either. I'm in the camp that leans strongly towards the idea that killing animals for the joy of killing them is 'death for no reason'. Perhaps the better way to phrase it would be 'death for no good reason', but that would ruin Morrissey's scanning, as well as weakening his point.
 
You have a point, however there is also the question of what we might consider a 'death for no reason'. For Morrissey, it is killing animals for food. For others it might not be that, but killing animals for sport might fall in that category. For others still, killing animals for sport isn't a death for no reason either. I'm in the camp that is leans strongly towards the idea that killing animals for the joy of killing them is 'death for no reason'. Perhaps the better way to phrase it would be 'death for no good reason', but that would ruin Morrissey's scanning, as well as weakening his point.

They are both death for enjoyment though, be a tasty steak or blasting round the country side on horse back. We can live perfectly healthy lives without meat in our society. We eat meat because it tastes nice.
 
They are both death for enjoyment though, be a tasty steak or blasting round the country side on horse back. We can live perfectly healthy lives without meat in our society. We eat meat because it tastes nice.
We eat meat because it tastes nice begs the question: why does it taste nice? In our society now, we can live perfectly healthy lives without meat, but humans have certainly evolved gaining advantages from eating meat. So we eat meat because it tastes nice even when we don't have to, but we also eat meat because we have always done so - its biological and cultural roots are deep, so deep that they are intertwined, and we can also live perfectly healthy lives with meat. I think there are coherent ethical arguments against eating meat, but the arguments that make various kinds of appeal to nature are not coherent.
 
We eat meat because it tastes nice begs the question: why does it taste nice? In our society now, we can live perfectly healthy lives without meat, but humans have certainly evolved gaining advantages from eating meat. So we eat meat because it tastes nice even when we don't have to, but we also eat meat because we have always done so - its biological and cultural roots are deep, so deep that they are intertwined, and we can also live perfectly healthy lives with meat. I think there are coherent ethical arguments against eating meat, but the arguments that make various kinds of appeal to nature are not coherent.

Nature is a rather hard one to define I'd say, but the fact that humans have spread to every corner of the planet shows that being omnivores has worked rather well for us.

Plenty of things arent "natural" like not dying from child birth or vaccines, but I do agree with the vegans that there is a pretty massively cognitive dissonance when it comes to factory farming. It's a pretty hard one to justify really. After 51 pages I've still not got any other then it tastes good.
 
Nature is a rather hard one to define I'd say, but the fact that humans have spread to every corner of the planet shows that being omnivores has worked rather well for us.

Plenty of things arent "natural" like not dying from child birth or vaccines, but I do agree with the vegans that there is a pretty massively cognitive dissonance when it comes to factory farming. It's a pretty hard one to justify really. After 51 pages I've still not got any other then it tastes good.
Yes. I said so earlier too - and I don't avoid factory-farmed produce as much as I should. But arguments against factory-farming aren't necessarily arguments against eating meat per se. Now some might argue that free-range chickens also have shit lives and it's also unacceptable, but CIWF have done the sums on it and you could have all free range chicken farming and produce as many chickens as are produced now in the UK within an area smaller than the Isle of Wight. It's perfectly feasible.
 
It's feasible but it isn't done. So it's not unreasonable for the argument to be directed at how eating meat is currently practised as opposed to how it could be done. I don't know anyone who only eats ethically sourced meat exclusively who isn't vegetarian/vegan most of the time, I suppose they must exist, but I'm not rich enough to move in such circles if they do.
 
It's feasible but it isn't done. So it's not unreasonable for the argument to be directed at how eating meat is currently practised as opposed to how it could be done. I don't know anyone who only eats ethically sourced meat exclusively who isn't vegetarian/vegan most of the time, I suppose they must exist, but I'm not rich enough to move in such circles if they do.
There have been some successes. Here in the EU, against veal crates, sow stalls and caged hens. Nowhere near enough to dismantle factory-farming, but enough will need serious system change. But there are stages along the way that can be worked towards. The battle against factory-farming may have fewer obstacles in its way if it doesn't involve getting rid of meat. We've only been factory-farming for a few decades (not that things were idyllic before that), and, setting aside ethics, factory-farming is also very bad for us, producing poor meat and degrading the environment. It is more a return to sanity than a dismantling and rebuilding of a whole culture.

One place I would agree that cognitive dissonance has grown is that factory farming has developed in the very time during which attitudes towards other animals have been changing.
 
454_weird1.jpg
 
I was confronted with the brutal reality of sheep processing at the tender age of 16, which included a spell in the aptly-named Gut Room. This included an incident in which a sheep's stomach full of half-digested grass landed hard enough in front of me to burst its contents all over me. And until secondary school I had been entirely a city kid. I think you overestimate how squeamish the general population is.
As I said earlier, I am well aware that there are some people (die hards?) who are not put off by death blood and guts, but there are also plenty that are...or at least would be if it wasn't hidden, so I don't believe I'm overestimating or underestimating anything tbh. It is what it is, the majority of meat eaters don't really give a shit and will eat meat anyway because it's the overwhelming norm and it's what people are used to. It is the default position. They may have some vague awareness of what goes on but are not confronted with it and it would appear would rather not know or see any of the goings on. The majority of meat eaters don't care if it's factory farmed or grass-fed, as long as they get what they're used to at a reasonable price and I very much doubt that they'd be prepared to pay the extra "humane slaughter tax". (still sounds like an oxymoron to me)

Exposure to the bloody reality DOES appear to have an effect and does make some people reconsider and make the transition away from the widespread cognitive dissonance to actually giving a fuck, hence the significant and steady growth in the number of vegans.

I haven't actually watched the documentaries myself but there are several available on youtube (cowspiracy, earthlings, forks over knives, what the health etc) that appear to have had an impact and momentum appears to be gathering pace. I did watch Simon Amstels's Carnage, and thought it was excellent. The fact that it was even on telly in the first place and got some of that BBC budget is progress as far as I'm concerned. This may explain the strength of the backlash from meat eaters who claim that they don't really care about veganism, but they clearly do, even if it's just heckling target practice, lol.
 
Last edited:
upload_2017-8-8_9-58-23.png

I trekked into the forest, listened out for wind-chimes, and found the skinny, plant-based herd, huddled in tie-dye apparel, singing with their eyes closed, sitting around a communal campfire. The long-haired, weed-smoking hippies were barbequing stuffed peppers and tofu burgers, whilst drinking homemade elderflower juice, infused with pine-cone coulis, through straws made from dandelion stalks.

I approached the first plant-chewer with caution, and then asked each of them the same five questions, to hopefully get an insight into their frail, confused minds…
  1. Why did you become a vegan-weirdo extremist?
  2. But what about cheeeese? How do you live without cheeeeeese?
  3. What’s your favourite meal? Leaves?
  4. What if you were in a rush, and needed a quick 5 minute dinner?
  5. What’s the one thing you’d recommend someone watch, if they wanted to understand why you’ve ‘willingly chosen’ to become a plant-eater?!
10 Vegan-Weirdo Extremists
 
For one, you're left in the uncomfortable position as an ideological vegan of thinking that you must be superior. Even the most reasonable on here like JR thinks he's more rational than a non-vegan. But wanting to kill animals, or have them killed for you, in order to eat their meat isn't in itself at all irrational. Neither is wanting not to - neither position is irrational.

Two points of correction: I don't think (and have never said) that *vegans* are superior to *non-vegans* nor do I think that *I* am more rational than a non-vegan. Rather, I think that (a) *veganism* is ethically superior to *non-veganism* and (b) that my arguments in favour of veganism are more rational than the arguments supplied for not going vegan.

re (a) I don't think there's anything novel about thinking that the ethical/political stance you adopt is superior to its alternatives, after all, if you didn't think that, why on earth would you adopt it? I take it that you think socialism is superior to capitalism, anti-death penalty is better than pro-death penalty, pro-Corbyn is better than pro-May etc. Yet I doubt you are so arrogant as to assume that you are superior in a general sense to those adopt contrary beliefs and practices to you. Same for me.

re (b) again, a similar story. I think that the arguments in favour of veganism are more rational than the arguments against it, if not I wouldn't have gone vegan would I? I think this because the types of arguments that people give in defence of animal product consumption are either inconsistent with arguments they'd make in any other context or are based on outright falsehoods (e.g. the belief that plant-based diets are not healthful or that they are too expensive). Until I am presented with an argument in defence of animal exploitation for food, clothing etc (i.e. non-veganism) that doesn't contradict the beliefs that the person holds in other contexts nor is based on false information then I will continue to think that that position is irrational.
 
Partly that. But I think there is also a part here that conflates horror at industrialised farming processes, and killing processes (I'm glad JR posted about gassing pigs as it made me go away and read up on it), with horror at the idea of killing any animal for food ever.
The industrialised farming process and the killing process are closely coupled and not entirely unrelated. They are two adjacent links on the meat supply chain. It's not as if they have absolutely nothing to do with each other as you appear to be implying.

It's clearly not true that day-to-day contact with the death of animals that you know puts tons of people off meat - where it's the social norm and all around you from a young age, the majority grow up socialised that this is the norm and with no problem not only eating meat but killing the animals themselves. I argued earlier that the distance from the process that modern life has engineered if anything produces more distaste and disgust at the idea because, while eating meat may still be the social norm, participating in killing animals isn't.
It's also possible that the disgust at blood and gore is a built in mechanism and the default response of most modern humans that is suppressed by conditioning, distance or obfuscation.

If you are one of those people that believes that the non obligate killing of animals for food isn't inherently "wrong" and that we need to keep more in touch with our strong carnist heritage, perhaps you can ask your local MP to lobby parliament for the introduction of some kind of re-acquaintance to the national curriculum. Perhaps have specialist schools, abattoir academy's or carnivores college that organise trips to slaughterhouses. Like this one for example. As we are supposedly natural meat eaters, surely there shouldn't be too much resistance.

So then you're reduced to the straw man that meat-eaters think we're 'better' than other animals in some way, which is not necessarily the case at all. That's not my thought process, but if you aren't horrified by the act of killing for food and you don't think 'humans are better than animals', what are you left with?

For one, you're left in the uncomfortable position as an ideological vegan of thinking that you must be superior. Even the most reasonable on here like JR thinks he's more rational than a non-vegan. But wanting to kill animals, or have them killed for you, in order to eat their meat isn't in itself at all irrational. Neither is wanting not to - neither position is irrational.
That reasoning appears to me to have more twists and turns than a contortionist and I have no idea how you reached those conclusions, and in fact may have even introduced a few straw-men of your own into the mix. Just because somebody believes that their lifestyle choice is better for them it doesn't mean that they believe they are better than others. This is a frequently used refrain against people looking to improve themselves. "You think you're better than us" and an accusation frequently levelled at vegans even when they have made no such claim.
I do believe that it IS irrational to kill and eat animals when we are not obligated to do so especially when nearly all the data available indicates that by doing so we are creating problems on many levels. On top of all that, to me it doesn't appear to be either humane or compassionate. I don't feel I need to apologise for having that opinion or to keep quiet to appease those that feel offended or threatened by a dose of common sense.
 
upload_2017-8-9_9-45-8.png

Dinner
Let me paint a little picture here, to help illustrate. It’s Saturday night, and perhaps you’re about to do one of the following:-
  • Some friends have invited you over for dinner at theirs. Michael is cooking his signature dish!
  • You’re going on a date, and about to have dinner at a lovely new restaurant in town.
  • You’ve been invited to a BBQ with your new colleagues from work.
You’re a little anxious, because at some point you’ve got to drop… the ‘V BOMB’.

Vegan is a dirty word. It would seem. So prepare yourself. There is also a possibility that your new friends/date/colleagues will write you off as soon as they even hear the V word. Not the decent ones, of course, but there are the odd few who will freak out and make a mental note that will allude to: ‘Oh God – not one of those! Won’t invite them out again. Weirdo extremist.’ You’ve got to develop a thick skin, and plenty of humour.

extreme2-copy.jpg

Why the fuck am I vegan? – The downside they don’t tell you about.
 
Hmmm, I love these, a bit like a green lychee...



Guinep I’m not a gambling man but I bet
A lot of you have never seen this yet
Over in the Caribbean there’s a lot oh yep
Introducing Guinep
Let’s open it and let's see
You see the skin comes off easily
Very similar to the Lychee
Should be comes from the same family
Pop it into your mouth and hmm tasty
Suck the pulp tangy and creamy
Discard the seed and take it from me
Guinep is one of nature's sweetie
Nature's sweets are proper
More healthy than a gobstopper
It's got the vitamins and it’s got the fibre
Low in calories you won't get wider
Antioxidants, mineral provider
Good for digestion increase saliva
Give your immune system a boost
Certain symptoms it might reduce
Make sure it is ripe before any use
You can also make some juice
Here are some more names for it
Spanish lime Mamoncillo kenip
Skinup, Skinip, Canep, Gunip
Chenette Limoncillo Quenepa Genip
 
But people are swayed by argument and debate otherwise how do you acccount for the rise in veganism?

Folks don't just wake up one morning thinking, you know I don't think I'll bother anymore with animal products.

I was a heavy meat eater for 40 odd years and became a veggie a couple of years ago mostly because of the ethics of meat eating. I used to really enjoy meat and it took years of listening to debates on the ethics of meat before I could reconcile my own ethics on it. I'd like to think I am heading towards veganism, but I'm not there yet.
I think it's a bit like how marketing and advertising works. Some people will buy into it and be persuaded and some won't. A number of those that are exposed to the full range of arguments in favour of veganism will find them persuasive and give it serious consideration. Most probably won't change and will continue with whatever they're doing now. I think the rise in veganism is built on the strong foundation of logic, reason and compassion.
 
The following video is imo an excellent summary of the cognitive dissonance that allows humans to do or condone bad things while viewing themselves as good people. This not only applies to how meat eaters justify killing animals unnecessarily, but also to other areas of human activity where we kid ourselves that we're not doing really shitty stuff...



Mic the Vegan is one of my favourite vegan youtubers. His videos are informative, well referenced, not too long and I like his content, presentation and humour. :thumbs:

I think he's really good too. I've watched a few of the videos on his channel. There is plenty of good material around for people curious enough to explore.
 
I had lunch in a vegan resturant earlier this week, I wish I'd taken a photo.
I ordered the hummus, olives and seasonal salad combo.
The olives were ok.
 
How can hummus possibly be less palatable than olives ?
Personally I group olives with rocket - highly over-rated.
 
Let's be honest. Veganism is healthier, less cruel, and less environmentally destructive than eating meat. However, I love the taste of meat. Even to the extent that I'm willing to risk my health, and cause some animal suffering and environmental damage. Clearly, my choice is less morally good than choosing veganism. But, for meat, that's something I'm willing to live with. And I don't care what vegans (or others) think about that, or how they choose to live.
 
Let's be honest. Veganism is healthier, less cruel, and less environmentally destructive than eating meat. However, I love the taste of meat. Even to the extent that I'm willing to risk my health, and cause some animal suffering and environmental damage. Clearly, my choice is less morally good than choosing veganism. But, for meat, that's something I'm willing to live with. And I don't care what vegans (or others) think about that, or how they choose to live.
Not sure I'd agree with the morality bit. But yeah.
 
Back
Top Bottom