Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do angry vegans turn you against going vegan?

Oh hell no! :eek: I could not face watching all of it, but is the idea that everyone seeing the video will immediately say "fine, absolutely I shall be completely vegan henceforth as long as you agree to shut up and go away at once, you speaking-Barbie scary plastic woman"? :eek:

Yeah. I had some bit of sympathy for what was posted on until I saw her.
 
:facepalm: plastic?? "Shut up" nice response! :hmm:
disappointing!
Well, I'm sorry, and I had no idea dragons were so sensitive, but that woman, wonderful and perfect though she may be, just had me wanting her to shut right up at once. It's the way of things - perhaps 80% of people like a presenter and 20% do not. Can't be helped.

If "plastic" is the word that annoyed you, well, it wasn't a carefully carefully phrased reaction, as I was doing other stuff at same time, but it was in reference to the whole false eyelashes, much make-up style of thing.

(And this is where I find out that the nice well-meaning presenter is in fact the sister or wife of ddraig, and that I must hide and run for the hills)
 
They like to pretend that meat eaters suffer crisis' of conscience every time they sniff a steak!
Yeah right, and there was lbj was complaining about being misrepresented. That statement is inaccurate. It's not merely sniffing a steak that causes pause for thought amongst non obligate omnis, it is the mostly hidden events that leading up to it becoming a steak that many find disturbing, when they finally see what goes on "behind closed doors" and when they are exposed to the scale of the cruelty, and it is this that is often the catalyst which causes some people to reconsider and change their ways. Of course there are the defiant ones (savages?) who dig their heels in and make a point of saying that they will never stop eating meat no matter what anybody says, a bit like those crazy NRA gun nuts, those avid bonecrushers may be beyond help, however I believe the momentum is slowly shifting and I have already seen a lot of progress made in the last 30 years.

Using Corbzy (also vegan) as a parallel example, we were told that he had zero chance of becoming leader of the Labour party, but enough people saw through the bs and he got elected against overwhelming odds. His enemies then tried to oust him with an engineered leadership challenge, and won that with a stronger mandate. Then came the General Election which many respected commentators predicted would be a complete disaster. Labour didn't win the election, but gave the Tories a bloody nose and far exceeded expectations.

Likewise, vegans are a tiny minority and overwhelming underdogs with huge opposition from people who either lack awareness or are obstinate and set in their ways or are wilfully ignorant, however the principles for which vegans stand are sound (at least they believe so) and when people are exposed those principles a growing number of them find the arguments compelling and are willing to at least consider the possibility of adopting a vegan lifestyle.
 
perfect video for this thread popped up earlier! :D :eek:


*lights touchpaper

tbh I didn't particularly like that video, and couldn't watch the whole thing. Her style of presentation did not resonate with me, and I don't like music playing in those kinds of videos I find it irritating. Having said all that, fair plays to her. I mostly agree with the core of the message although am a bit uncomfortable with the whole judging thing. Of course vegans believe that what they are doing is right and some of them are prepared to confront and hold a mirror up to the "wrongdoers". My preference is for a less overtly confrontational style, however if a bonecrusher gets in my face and starts talking bs up in my grill, I reserve the right to defend my position with bare logic.
 
Yeah right, and there was lbj was complaining about being misrepresented. That statement is inaccurate. It's not merely sniffing a steak that causes pause for thought amongst non obligate omnis, it is the mostly hidden events that leading up to it becoming a steak that many find disturbing, when they finally see what goes on "behind closed doors" and when they are exposed to the scale of the cruelty, and it is this that is often the catalyst which causes some people to reconsider and change their ways. Of course there are the defiant ones (savages?) who dig their heels in and make a point of saying that they will never stop eating meat no matter what anybody says, a bit like those crazy NRA gun nuts, those avid bonecrushers may be beyond help, however I believe the momentum is slowly shifting and I have already seen a lot of progress made in the last 30 years.

Using Corbzy (also vegan) as a parallel example, we were told that he had zero chance of becoming leader of the Labour party, but enough people saw through the bs and he got elected against overwhelming odds. His enemies then tried to oust him with an engineered leadership challenge, and won that with a stronger mandate. Then came the General Election which many respected commentators predicted would be a complete disaster. Labour didn't win the election, but gave the Tories a bloody nose and far exceeded expectations.

Likewise, vegans are a tiny minority and overwhelming underdogs with huge opposition from people who either lack awareness or are obstinate and set in their ways or are wilfully ignorant, however the principles for which vegans stand are sound (at least they believe so) and when people are exposed those principles a growing number of them find the arguments compelling and are willing to at least consider the possibility of adopting a vegan lifestyle.
So those are the options you present : lacking in self awareness, obstinate or wilfully ignorant.

Nothing condescending or superior about that. Oh no. Not judging non - vegans in the slightest.

And it's meat - eaters who are the patronising ones?
 
So those are the options you present : lacking in self awareness, obstinate or wilfully ignorant.

Nothing condescending or superior about that. Oh no. Not judging non - vegans in the slightest.

And it's meat - eaters who are the patronising ones?
lol, couldn't stay away huh? I didn't say "lacking in self awareness". Misrepresenting again, eh?
Yeah you keep banging on about being "condescending" which sounds like nonsense to me, I'm not sure why you persist with that but it's probably because you're a bit frustrated by your lack of progress in convincing folks that killing animals is somehow not cruel at all and is in fact "humane", lol.

I make no apology for believing that veganism is a better lifestyle choice and philosophy, regardless of whether you agree or not, in the same way that I believe that aparthied is bollocks and that racial equality and harmony is a superior philosophy. If racists found that point of view patronising then tough titties. Similarly if bonecrushers find vegan beliefs patronising, that's just too bad.

I never said that meatheads are patronising so I'm not sure why you've just made that up. Meatheads in this thread have been the ones that have more often than not been the hostile and unfriendly ones looking to provoke, mock and sneer or just post distracting diversionary rubbish. I don't mind because I can stick up for myself and the more the meatheads talk the more their arguments (or lack thereof) are exposed to close scrutiny...so keep talking and give us more material to work with. :)
 
At the end of the day, it's about living longer and healthier lives - and after smoking, coronary artery disease is the biggest killer in the west. And you don't get it eating broccoli.

View attachment 112347

What you eat is not the be all and end all of a long and healthy life though; inheriting the wrong genes and finding yourself underneath a falling piano could all play a part.
 
What you eat is not the be all and end all of a long and healthy life though; inheriting the wrong genes and finding yourself underneath a falling piano could all play a part.

Eliminating 90% of Heart Disease Risk | NutritionFacts.org

Dr Greger puts it at much less than 1 percent.

I saw a video the other day which annoyingly I've lost track of, which covered a study of autopsies on US army recruits in WW2, Korea and Vietnam which showed a massive prevalence of early stage atherosclerosis - a bit like the malnutrition found in WW1 soldiers ...
A subsequent study shows it's much reduced - though we're now talking about career soldiers - and of course far fewer of them now smoke.

One in 12 in military has clogged heart arteries

For myself, based on relatives, I have been lucky with my genes, but even luckier with my lifestyle choices I made at 21 (diet) and 27 (exercise) - and also of course not to smoke - or to drink recreationally.
 
Last edited:
What you eat is not the be all and end all of a long and healthy life though; inheriting the wrong genes and finding yourself underneath a falling piano could all play a part.
The "why bother with what you eat, you're wasting your time, we're all going to die anyway, might as well enjoy ourselves while we're here" refrain, not heard that one before. :p
Lifestyle choices are the biggest contributor to health or lack of health (way above genetics and accidents), and what you eat is the major factor. Somehow a lot of people equate attempts to eat healthily with being boring, "ooh a salad...are you trying to be healthy now", which to this day I've never understood. At the same time stupid things like smoking and drinking alcohol are seen as being cool and sexy, even though they are clearly ridiculous and have so many negatives.
 
At the same time stupid things like smoking and drinking alcohol are seen as being cool and sexy, even though they are clearly ridiculous and have so many negatives.
I suspect a robust statistical analysis of associations between coolness and life-preserving common sense would find, at best, a loose correlation.

"I am totally going to drive my twin airbag Volvo 3mph below the national speed limit to pick up my actuarially-chosen date in scientifically approved loose fitting underwear, which improve my chances of longer life fertility, for an evening of self-improving activities."

I mean, obvs great in many ways, but that's not what cool historically was. (Until this generation of young people, who appear a bit wholesome. If national datasets are to be trusted.)
 
The "why bother with what you eat, you're wasting your time, we're all going to die anyway, might as well enjoy ourselves while we're here" refrain, not heard that one before. :p
Lifestyle choices are the biggest contributor to health or lack of health (way above genetics and accidents), and what you eat is the major factor. Somehow a lot of people equate attempts to eat healthily with being boring, "ooh a salad...are you trying to be healthy now", which to this day I've never understood. At the same time stupid things like smoking and drinking alcohol are seen as being cool and sexy, even though they are clearly ridiculous and have so many negatives.

Don't try and put words in my mouth - you sound like a teenager trying to score giggles at a sixth-form debate.

Back on topic, and assuming we're talking about Westerners, yes lifestyle choices contribute to health (as does access to medical treatment which may be more to the point for some of us). I take issue with the belief that food is the single most important factor though, and with the belief that some people are healthier than others simply because of what they eat. Fiddling about with diet to promote health has been a kind of holy grail of medics (and quacks) since god knows when and, having spent what, three thousand years, experimenting on ourselves we still don't have any definitive answer. There are studies that show eating x and avoiding y are good for you and other studies that show the opposite. Off the top of my head I think the only ones I've heard of that are consistent in the direction of advice are those warning off stuff prepared by corporations (ready meals, refined carbs, sugary shit) and those promoting eating your greens; neatly summarised by Michael Pollen - Eat food. Not too much, mostly vegetables.

You mention 'healthy' food being equated with boring food. The dieting industry has accomplished that for us and the food industry as a whole couldn't be happier. The profit to be had out of persuading people that this or that thing is 'healthy' and selling it a thousand over-processed, over-packaged versions must be immense. And of course, any food can be boring; it rarely absolutely has to be and being properly hungry helps get most things down.
 
Have we had the standard Urban comment yet that healthy eating is a luxury available only to the well-off ?

i.e a class issue ...
 
Last edited:
Don't try and put words in my mouth - you sound like a teenager trying to score giggles at a sixth-form debate.
What nonsense is this? If you believe I have misrepresented your position you can easily correct it. Alternatively you can whine about me putting words into your mouth (as if that was possible). Anyway, I don't think I was that far off if at all...

Back on topic, and assuming we're talking about Westerners, yes lifestyle choices contribute to health (as does access to medical treatment which may be more to the point for some of us). I take issue with the belief that food is the single most important factor though, and with the belief that some people are healthier than others simply because of what they eat. Fiddling about with diet to promote health has been a kind of holy grail of medics (and quacks) since god knows when and, having spent what, three thousand years, experimenting on ourselves we still don't have any definitive answer. There are studies that show eating x and avoiding y are good for you and other studies that show the opposite. Off the top of my head I think the only ones I've heard of that are consistent in the direction of advice are those warning off stuff prepared by corporations (ready meals, refined carbs, sugary shit) and those promoting eating your greens; neatly summarised by Michael Pollen - Eat food. Not too much, mostly vegetables.
Fine, if you don't believe that what you eat is important then behave accordingly and eat what the hell you like. If others believe that diet as an important part of their health regimen (and I certainly do), then that's their business. Why should you be taking issue with that others believe? Get on with your own shit and leave them alone. You may believe that there isn't any "definitive answer" and that's possibly true because of the amount of variables involved, however the principles are well known even if a lot of people don't follow them. An abundance of fresh, whole, ripe, mostly plant real proper food is a good foundation to build on, and if you disagree with that, good luck to you.

You mention 'healthy' food being equated with boring food. The dieting industry has accomplished that for us and the food industry as a whole couldn't be happier. The profit to be had out of persuading people that this or that thing is 'healthy' and selling it a thousand over-processed, over-packaged versions must be immense. And of course, any food can be boring; it rarely absolutely has to be and being properly hungry helps get most things down.
You appear to be jumping all over the place. I personally don't equate 'healthy' food to being boring and don't equate over-packaged, over processed food as real food at all. As I said earlier, fresh unprocessed produce grown in good soil without chemicals is a good base to build on in my opinion.
 
So, anyone else teetotal?
I've been pregnant and/or breastfeeding for over 3 years now and as a result stopped enjoying drinking and am very close to teetotal (I will very occasionally drink a beer with an ABV as high as 2% if it's good enough to be worth the bother - I do drink very low alcohol <1% beer regularly). I also abstained from cow's dairy for a year of that as my son was cow's milk protein intolerant.

I'd like to be vegan in the long term (mostly environmental concerns which frankly anyone with children should share, but also cruelty concerns re dairy) but am a bit concerned that teetotal + vegan may = no friends.
 
Have we had the standard Urban comment yet that healthy eating is a luxury available only to the well-off ?

i.e a class issue ...

Yes we have, and we've also had the point made that vegetarian and vegan food doesn't need to cost a lot or be bought from overpriced elitist hippy shops .. and if we haven't then I'm making it now. I'd add that given the price of decent meat these days, vegetarianism is actually a good idea for anyone who doesn't have a lot of money.
 
I'd like to be vegan in the long term (mostly environmental concerns which frankly anyone with children should share, but also cruelty concerns re dairy) but am a bit concerned that teetotal + vegan may = no friends.
Does teetotal + vegan = no friends? I suppose it's possible. It really depends on your situation and your personality and the personality of your friends. If you have friends that understand what you're about and are ok with it and can happily accommodate you then I think you should be fine.

I haven't found that not drinking alcohol and being vegan to be much of a hindrance or social impediment, but then again my personality may be very different to yours. If there was no one around I'd be quite happy and comfortable with my own company and with my family around me. Other people need to have umpteen people around them all the time and like to fit in with the norms of their friends circle. My wife is a lot more social than I am and is super friendly even to complete strangers. Being a vegan teetotal hasn't stopped her at all. Like many other things, your circle of friends can be affected by several things, having children, moving house, children changing school, moving to a new country, changing jobs etc, all of those can result in you losing some friends and gaining new friends. If you have decent friends then it shouldn't be an issue that you are vegan or teetotal (unless you're embarrassed about either of those).
 
Yes we have, and we've also had the point made that vegetarian and vegan food doesn't need to cost a lot or be bought from overpriced elitist hippy shops .. and if we haven't then I'm making it now. I'd add that given the price of decent meat these days, vegetarianism is actually a good idea for anyone who doesn't have a lot of money.
That's a good point, it doesn't have to be expensive, but it can be for inexperienced people who don't know the ropes, not sure what to eat and so end up buying lots of Linda McCartney sausages and burgers. Not that I'm knocking that type of "food" at all if that's what you're into, however it is easily possible to have an abundance of vegan friendly food without having to break the bank.

 
I eat the same every day which makes it easy ...

Having plugged it into Cron-o-meter, it ticks all the boxes ...

cronoday.png
In an effort to get my calories down from over 3,000 to my ideal of 2800, and to try this "fasting" thing, I skip breakfast - I suspect in the future I may start the day with green smoothies.

lunch - wholemeal vegan pasty - £1.24
flapjack 99p

onion - 20p ?
Broccoli - 48p
mushrooms £1 - for vitamin D+
red pepper - 48p
two grated carrots - 15p
beans - 50p ? (I actually use DIY sprouted beans)

£5.04 per day ....

soy sauce, tahini, Aldi plum stirfry sauce ...

There are a few bits and bobs I left out - I eat masses of home-sprouted beans and seeds that would cost over £2 a day if I bought them ready-grown .. .. B12 pills ...

Indulgences / excesses (apart from my lunchtime flapjack) - cheap generic wholegrain cereal / oats, unsweetened soy milk, fruit ...
jam, bread mix, the odd pot of hummus / biscuits ... tea, 1 bottle of wine per week.

So perhaps £8 per day ?
 
Last edited:
I make no apology for believing that veganism is a better lifestyle choice and philosophy, regardless of whether you agree or not, in the same way that I believe that aparthied is bollocks and that racial equality and harmony is a superior philosophy. If racists found that point of view patronising then tough titties. Similarly if bonecrushers find vegan beliefs patronising, that's just too bad.

I never said that meatheads are patronising so I'm not sure why you've just made that up. Meatheads in this thread have been the ones that have more often than not been the hostile and unfriendly ones looking to provoke, mock and sneer or just post distracting diversionary rubbish. I don't mind because I can stick up for myself and the more the meatheads talk the more their arguments (or lack thereof) are exposed to close scrutiny...so keep talking and give us more material to work with. :)

This post goes to the heart of it . We do not say eating meat is better than veganism, or makes us better people than vegans. It's the vegans who are claiming the moral highground.

Why would meat eaters, or as you charmingly call us, bonecrushers and meatheads, be patronising. We're not making a moral point at all. It's not a question of morals or justification for us. It's just food. We don't need to put up arguments for your scrutiny .
 
This post goes to the heart of it . We do not say eating meat is better than veganism, or makes us better people than vegans. It's the vegans who are claiming the moral highground.
Another bit of selective vision going on here. From a vegan perspective, I have had meatheads making derogatory remarks and being dismissive of vegans countless times, and yet apparently that never happens. Yeah right. I haven't looked at all the threads in this forum on this subject but I'm willing to bet that most of the flak has been incoming towards the veg*ns. That's ok, I don't mind because I can spit some bars back if required and I am very comfortable with my choices, however it would appear that some of the more thin skinned meatheads can quite happily dish it out but whine and complain when some of it comes back with interest.

Of course I'm going to believe that my dietary choice is "better" than some of the other available choices, that's why I chose it, duh. The bit about it making vegans better people is an exaggeration and misrepresentation. People who happen to be vegan can be dicks just like people who are not vegan. I have never claimed that I am better than anyone else be they meathead or veghead, but I am very happy with my choice of lifestyle and make no apology for believing it to be "best of breed". If some people don't like that and feel patronised by my choices then as I said earlier, that's just too bad.

Why would meat eaters, or as you charmingly call us, bonecrushers and meatheads, be patronising. We're not making a moral point at all. It's not a question of morals or justification for us. It's just food. We don't need to put up arguments for your scrutiny .
First of all, nowhere did I say that meatheads were patronising. Secondly of course for you it's not a question of morals because you are happy with your decision to participate in the kiling and eating of animals when there is absolutely NO NEED TO DO SO. Most vegans find that attitude to be immoral, except apparently we're supposed to keep our mouths shut and not say anything about it. Using racial segregation as an analogy again, I presume that many of those that benefited from racial segregation and thought that there was absolutely nothing morally wrong with it because it's obvious that black people are "lesser" humans and didn't want to hear any of this morality nonsense from silly left wing anti-racists.

The choice is between not killing animals unnecessarily and killing animals when there's no need to. I make no absolutely apology for believing that one of those positions is "better" and morally superior to the other, just as an anti-racists position is morally superior to that of a racist imo.
 
That's a good point, it doesn't have to be expensive, but it can be for inexperienced people who don't know the ropes, not sure what to eat and so end up buying lots of Linda McCartney sausages and burgers. Not that I'm knocking that type of "food" at all if that's what you're into, however it is easily possible to have an abundance of vegan friendly food without having to break the bank.



You do need to be able to cook to work with that lot though and they would still be bland as fuck without spices etc. Not quite sure what he was going to suggest doing with that whole wheat pasta. Eat it by itself?
 
He was a bit out of date with the "combining protein" business too ...
Yes I would have scrubbed the pasta - never eat it myself these days.
A distinct shortage of tinned tomatoes etc ... though they're rather expensive these days...

As to "cooking skills" - all I've ever needed was a pressure cooker, a wok and a microwave - of late not even the pressure cooker.

I'm probably a bit weird but one of the reasons I no longer cook up loads of brown rice these days is because I can easily knock it back with just soy sauce, tahini and perhaps some chutney - ditto yellow split peas or chickpeas ...
 
You do need to be able to cook to work with that lot though and they would still be bland as fuck without spices etc. Not quite sure what he was going to suggest doing with that whole wheat pasta. Eat it by itself?
Yeah, I put that up as an example of the sorts of things you can buy for not a lot of money from a regular common or garden supermarket, it wasn't intended to be a a step by step guide.
I don't consider myself to be a chef but surely it's relatively easy to knock something up even for total kitchen newbs. Having said that I do know some people who are literally completely lost in a kitchen without a recipe and specific instructions and measurements. I tend to wing it most of the time and almost never use a recipe.

Cheap Lazy Vegan has loads of content on her youtube channel which might work for some people. I personally don't really follow any of these guides myself and tend to just wing it in the kitchen, but for beginners they can give a bit of an insight as to what can be done.

Anyway here is another example, with actual cookery taking place...

 
Yeah, I put that up as an example of the sorts of things you can buy for not a lot of money from a regular common or garden supermarket, it wasn't intended to be a a step by step guide.
I don't consider myself to be a chef but surely it's relatively easy to knock something up even for total kitchen newbs. Having said that I do know some people who are literally completely lost in a kitchen without a recipe and specific instructions and measurements. I tend to wing it most of the time and almost never use a recipe.

Cheap Lazy Vegan has loads of content on her youtube channel which might work for some people. I personally don't really follow any of these guides myself and tend to just wing it in the kitchen, but for beginners they can give a bit of an insight as to what can be done.

Anyway here is another example, with actual cookery taking place...



I'm not actually having a pop, but I think you do need to be a decent cook to make tasty vegan food (I can do a passable job) . I guess it's what your pallet is used to. I know bacon is always used by meat meat eaters as to why they couldn't give up meat (and vegans must crave) but it's a highly concentrated flavour that requires few cooking skills.

I love recipes, but more as a starting point to new ideas for food rather then something to be slavishly followed.
 
I eat the same every day which makes it easy ...

Having plugged it into Cron-o-meter, it ticks all the boxes ...

View attachment 112401
In an effort to get my calories down from over 3,000 to my ideal of 2800, and to try this "fasting" thing, I skip breakfast - I suspect in the future I may start the day with green smoothies.

lunch - wholemeal vegan pasty - £1.24
flapjack 99p

onion - 20p ?
Broccoli - 48p
mushrooms £1 - for vitamin D+
red pepper - 48p
two grated carrots - 15p
beans - 50p ? (I actually use DIY sprouted beans)

£5.04 per day ....

soy sauce, tahini, Aldi plum stirfry sauce ...

There are a few bits and bobs I left out - I eat masses of home-sprouted beans and seeds that would cost over £2 a day if I bought them ready-grown .. .. B12 pills ...

Indulgences / excesses (apart from my lunchtime flapjack) - cheap generic wholegrain cereal / oats, unsweetened soy milk, fruit ...
jam, bread mix, the odd pot of hummus / biscuits ... tea, 1 bottle of wine per week.

So perhaps £8 per day ?
The idea of eating the same thing every day is utterly miserable to me. The joy of food and shared meals with others is one of life's great pleasures.
 
Back
Top Bottom