Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do angry vegans turn you against going vegan?

As I am not able to consume minerals directly from the rock, nor to create energy from sunlight, I am therefor obliged to eat other living organism that can or can predate on those who can who can. Which implies existence based on prior levels of production
All who eat anything other than handfuls of rock are Fascist
Nice
 
Oysters though, they haven't even got a nervous system, let alone a face.

There's really not much to separate an oyster from a plant in terms of awareness, sensitivity or cognition. The main reason I don't eat them is that (I assume) they taste fucking foul.
 
Trees sleep. Apparently. Though I don't eat trees.

Sleep doesn't indicate consciousness persay. It's a fuzzy concept anyway.
Sleep indicates periods of reduced awareness, which suggests periods of increased awareness. I agree, however, that consciousness is a fuzzy concept. Is there something it is like to be something? Does it have a point of view? Or, perhaps more specifically, does it produce a set of images of itself in the world that constitutes experience and gives it a sense of 'me/not me'? They're not easy questions to answer, imo, although I'm very happy to assign conscious experience similar to that which I experience to a lot of non-human animals. I think it's hard to argue against it.
 
littlebabyjesus it helps if you quote whatever you're responding to as it's not always clear who or what your reply is referring to, or if you are just talking out loud and not expecting a response.

Aside perhaps from Casually Red, I don't see any 'anti-vegans' on this thread at all, unless you define 'anti-vegan' as anyone who isn't vegan.
I was going to recommend a trip to Specsavers but thought that might be a bit too rude. You may not have noticed the many negative comments directed towards vegans in this thread, but honestly they are there. Apparently this is because vegans are fair game and it's ok to harass, mock and ridicule them because they refuse to acknowledge how totally wrong they are. You might be quibbling over the use of the term "anti-vegan" or claim that it is some kind of new fangled horrible slur and a victimisation of "normal" folk, so I'll suggest a few alternatives...vegan critics, vegan super haters, vegan assassins. Ok, I know, those were rather poor, but it's quite late and I'm tired.

btw that article is wrong about chimps. Many chimps regularly eat meat, although the article is right that it doesn't form the majority of their diets and they can survive without it. Bit like us. Here's an article about how in one area, chimps are hunting certain monkeys to the verge of extinction.
As with many of the discussion points, I don't believe that it is the clear cut absolute right or wrong that you appear to believe exists. There are others who have drawn different conclusions.

It's also an odd distinction to say that insects somehow aren't meat. Insects have muscles made of similar proteins to the muscles of other animals. There's no good reason not to classify insects as meat.
It's not something that I'd personally want to spend too much time quibbling about tbh, and I don't see anything particularly wrong with having a distinction between insects and meat. If you think it's important enough then just amalgamate the figures. Job done.

As for not salivating at the prospect of a kill, I also don't salivate upon seeing a field of wheat. Doesn't stop me enjoying a slice of toast.
Which may indicate that the bloody entrails of dead animals and the fields of wheat that Theresa May was vandalising in her youth are not "peoplefood", ie foods that we could catch/eat/digest easily without the use of tools and heavy processing. That is one school of thought. Of course it is possible that you are not compatible with that kind of thinking but perhaps you can find it within yourself to allow others to entertain alternative possibilities.
 
Last edited:
I was going to recommend a trip to Specsavers but thought that might be a bit too rude. You may not have noticed the many negative comments directed towards vegans in this thread, but honestly they are there.
Wasn't bothered about a response. I was just addressing some of the issues in the link you provided. There are more issues with it, but tbh I can't be arsed. It's riddled with problems.

As for the above, I think we're at crossed-purposes. Negative comment towards a poster who is vegan is not the same as 'anti-vegan' as I was using it. I've directed some negative comments towards a few posters on this thread because I had negative things to say about what they were saying. Plus at one point I lost patience with ddraig. But that really wasn't an anti-vegan comment, purely an anti-ddraig one.
 
I go with a general assumption that all animals can suffer and in our (inevitable) exploitation of them what we need to do is make sure that suffering is minimal and short. What else can we do? Expecting humanity to entirely stop exploiting the other animals on this planet is absurd.
As with most principles, if it's important enough you do think is right and whatever you can within your sphere of influence. As I said earlier, for me the principle is that I believe it unethical to kill animals when it isn't necessary to do so. I don't expect humanity to stop doing what I think is unethical any time soon, perhaps not even for a good few generations, however just because I may be in an overwhelming minority, it doesn't stop me from doing what I believe to be the "right" thing.

Can I add that anyway I wouldn't be at all surprised if plants too, suffer. I just think since there's no way we can know what that might be like, we dismiss it as just not existing at all. But we don't know for a fact that it's not the case.
The "but plants tho" argument appears to be very popular argument. Even if it were true that plants suffer and can feel pain, we would still require more of that "suffering" in order to feed the animals that we would eventually eat. Not very efficient. There is also another dimension. Fruit bearing trees. One of the more sophisticated plants bearing fruit for humans, one of the more sophisticated animals. Potentially a lot less "suffering".

I do think there are interesting discussions to be found inside concepts of animal suffering and animal rights, to do with how we choose to treat other living things, especially weak and vulnerable ones, and why. It gets drowned out by shouting a lot though.
I agree it is possible to have interesting discussions, although probably not in this forum. There seems to be a concerted attempt to sabotage and spoil.
 
As with most principles, if it's important enough you do think is right and whatever you can within your sphere of influence. As I said earlier, for me the principle is that I believe it unethical to kill animals when it isn't necessary to do so. I don't expect humanity to stop doing what I think is unethical any time soon, perhaps not even for a good few generations, however just because I may be in an overwhelming minority, it doesn't stop me from doing what I believe to be the "right" thing.
Fair dos.

And I may have confused you with another poster regarding arguments being made, but this position doesn't need an extra justification to be made that humans somehow are not natural meat-eaters. That we can live perfectly well without meat is surely sufficient, and avoids the need to make decidedly dodgy arguments.
 
Sleep indicates periods of reduced awareness, which suggests periods of increased awareness. I agree, however, that consciousness is a fuzzy concept. Is there something it is like to be something? Does it have a point of view? Or, perhaps more specifically, does it produce a set of images of itself in the world that constitutes experience and gives it a sense of 'me/not me'? They're not easy questions to answer, imo, although I'm very happy to assign conscious experience similar to that which I experience to a lot of non-human animals. I think it's hard to argue against it.


Why is an elephant different to a pig? Some extra level of consciousness? Some extra recognition of self perceived by humans? I might try a more coherent question tomorrow. But to me we do not eschew eating certain animals purely based on consciousness of course. Cultural informed predilections. Anthropomorphism and so on. Speaking as one meat eater to another. Vegans will be horrified at this sort of discussion I suppose. But it is interesting, what is it to be conscious. How does this relate between us and other creatures, AI.
 
And I may have confused you with another poster regarding arguments being made, but this position doesn't need an extra justification to be made that humans somehow are not natural meat-eaters. That we can live perfectly well without meat is surely sufficient, and avoids the need to make decidedly dodgy arguments.
tbh, I don't really feel I need to justify my beliefs or opinions to anybody. I'll express what I believe to be true and it's up to others whether they accept my opinions or not. I am open to listening to other viewpoints and will accept those that make sense to me and leave to one side those that don't.

I personally don't much care for the sneering tone and mockery that seems to be fashionable, tolerated and even encouraged here, but I think I have a fairly thick skin and it doesn't particularly bother me. I just think that it's a shame that the negative tone tends to spoil what might otherwise be a good healthy discussion/debate.
 
Why is an elephant different to a pig? Some extra level of consciousness? Some extra recognition of self perceived by humans? I might try a more coherent question tomorrow. But to me we do not eschew eating certain animals purely based on consciousness of course. Cultural informed predilections. Anthropomorphism and so on. Speaking as one meat eater to another. Vegans will be horrified at this sort of discussion I suppose. But it is interesting, what is it to be conscious. How does this relate between us and other creatures, AI.
It's not entirely rational, but elephants are clearly capable of a degree of abstract thought, reasoning and long-term thinking, and killing one elephant hurts all those other elephants who knew it. (Gruesomely, that's why during culls they now try to kill whole families. They used to leave youngsters out of a misguided compassion, but all they managed to do was produce new generations of fucked-up adults, not properly socialised and with lost knowledge about how to survive.) According to Carl Safina, in traditional Maasai beliefs, only humans and elephants have souls. Humans living near them have long noticed something special about elephants. Pigs are also pretty smart, mind. It doesn't stand up too well to close examination.

But then I don't see how, even if were were all vegans, we could live on this planet without still killing other conscious animals that compete for the same resources. We all have to draw a line somewhere on that, regardless of what we eat, and at some point put humans first wrt taking and protecting the resources we need. That's why I have a problem with some animal rights activists' absolute moral categories on this stuff - I just don't think they stand up to scrutiny.

I've killed chickens and not had a problem doing it. I've witnessed the slaughter of a pig and it wasn't pleasant - it knew exactly what was going on and squealed its head off. Was done very clumsily, which didn't help. I did stop eating pigs for a while, but not chickens or cows or sheep. That wasn't particularly rational either.
 
Somewhere up thread I believe reference was made to Seventh Day Adventist health studies, the claim being something along the lines they live forever because they are vegan/vegetarian. These studies are referenced all over the internet as proving a vegetarian/vegan diet is best for health/long life. (Health and long life tend to be conflated.)

I was just looking* at this Findings for AHS-2 | School of Public Health | Loma Linda University and find they have the strangest definitions of 'vegetarian'. Most of the study participants in this one (two-thirds!) actually eat dead things :hmm:

My two cents worth - angry vegans just irritate me, much the same as the fascist tendency down the pub; 'debate' to some people simply translates as 'listen to me' and the angrier they are the sillier they get. I happily agree with anyone who thinks we should take better care of ourselves and our planet, and be respectful of the many living things we share the Earth with, the devil as always is in the detail. And the moment anyone mentions 'secretions' or 'pus' I know that debate is not on the agenda.

*I was looking to check whether I really did read, in relation to SDA studies, that the 'vegetarian' group who eat some fish are showing the best health outcomes. I will be moving to the seaside before too long and won't have space to keep hens, so vastly reduced egg consumption for me but a world of food opportunity in the sea for me to wonder about.
 
I wonder how many "angry vegans" people have actually met or know. I've certainly met a couple who drone on far too much about their choice of diet - one often wears clothes emblazoned with the word VEGAN just in case anyone hasn't heard him, but in reality 99% of the vegans I've met/known never even mention it. Compare that with the much, much higher percentage of meat eaters who feel strangely compelled to start shoving in their oar when they overhear me ordering veggie food.
 
I wonder how many "angry vegans" people have actually met or know. I've certainly met a couple who drone on far too much about their choice of diet - one often wears clothes emblazoned with the word VEGAN just in case anyone hasn't heard him, but in reality 99% of the vegans I've met/known never even mention it. Compare that with the much, much higher percentage of meat eaters who feel strangely compelled to start shoving in their oar when they overhear me ordering veggie food.
This has also been my experience, nutrition experts suddenly pop out from nowhere. I'm beginning to suspect that this whole "angry vegan" thing is an urban myth.

Sure there are probably some vegans who are complete tools, but there are also "normal" people who are also complete tools, the fact that a complete tool might happen to be a vegan is irrelevant, except to those who are looking to find fault and will grab on tightly to any negative story they can find to tar all members of that group with the same brush and make it the defining feature of being a vegan. :rolleyes:

I can understand how some muslims must feel when somebody who just happens to call themselves a muslim does something horrible and they end up having to justify their existence to angry critics.
 
Last edited:
This has also been my experience, nutrition experts suddenly pop out from nowhere. I'm beginning to suspect that this whole "angry vegan" thing is an urban myth.

Sure there are probably some vegans who are complete tools, but there are also "normal" people who are also complete tools, the fact that a complete tool might happen to be a vegan is irrelevant, except to those who are looking to find fault and will grab on tightly to any negative story they can find to tar all members of that group with the same brush and make it the defining feature of being a vegan. :rolleyes:

I can understand how some muslims must feel when somebody who just happens to call themselves a muslim does something horrible and they end up having to justify their existence to angry critics.
It's not just about people that we meet irl, though is it? The internet counts too and there are loads of tools that fly into one when veganism is even mentioned, let alone criticised (which rarely happens in reality unless someone's taking the piss or deliberately trolling). This thread, and pretty much every other one on the topic, is ample proof of that.

I don't know many vegans irl. I know plenty of veggies and pescetarians and they'll all completely sound. Of the handful of vegans that I have actually spent any time with, all but one of them have mentioned their diet and lifestyle choice without being asked. I have been in a burger restaurant in Sweden when a demo of 3 or 4 people in VEGAN t-shirts tried to smash the windows but it they were plate glass. The sticks they were using (hockey, I think) just kept bouncing off but it made a hell of a noise inside.

You haven't been abused or ridiculed on this thread and neither has Veganomics. Ddraig has copped a bit because he has masses of form and his posts here have been true to it.
 
Last edited:
I wonder how many "angry vegans" people have actually met or know. I've certainly met a couple who drone on far too much about their choice of diet - one often wears clothes emblazoned with the word VEGAN just in case anyone hasn't heard him, but in reality 99% of the vegans I've met/known never even mention it. Compare that with the much, much higher percentage of meat eaters who feel strangely compelled to start shoving in their oar when they overhear me ordering veggie food.

There's that joke, 'How do you know if someone's vegan? Just wait, they'll tell you!' Hohoho.
I've encountered a few obstreperous vegans on the internet, but oddly never been harangued by meat eaters. I say oddly, because I don't currently eat meat, fish or dairy, yet I get vegans preaching bollocks and meat-eaters letting me get on with it. I don't know any vegans* in real life, but the meat-eaters still don't bother me. Anecdote is a fine thing.

*I do know four 'vegans at home' who will eat dairy when out if there is nothing else available, and eat eggs as a treat. They're not angry at all, but then they're not orthodox vegans, are they. All of us are just people living with themselves and their choices.
 
It's not just about people that we meet irl, though is it? The internet counts too and there are loads of tools that fly into one when veganism is even mentioned, let alone criticised (which rarely happens in reality unless someone's taking the piss or deliberately trolling). This thread, and pretty much every other one on the topic, is ample proof of that.
I regard personal experience and interaction as FAR more reliable and realistic than interactions with people on the internet, imo it's not even close. The internet is a haven for cowardly trolls who are free to say whatever they want under the cover of anonymity, things that they would never say in that way in a face to face situation.

It's ironic that you cite this very thread as your example of vegans behaving badly, lol. The bias is so strong. A proper unbiased audit of posts might give a more accurate and balanced picture. It would appear that whenever the topic is raised, that it is non vegans, who supposedly aren't particularly interested in the topic, but somehow manage to attach themselves like barnacles to the thread and swarm, sabotage and trash the threads with all sorts of rubbish and irrelevant diversions. (says he posting a long-ass reply). The "Who's replied" list for this thread is quite revealing.

I think it would be fantastic if it were possible to have real proper discussion on this topic in this forum for those that are genuinely interested, but I'm not going to hold my breath waiting for that to happen.

I don't know many vegans irl. I know plenty of veggies and pescetarians and they'll all completely sound. Of the handful of vegans that I have actually spent any time with, all but one of them have mentioned their diet and lifestyle choice without being asked.
Yeah, if you say so, or to coin that well known internet phrase "pics or it didn't happen". The internet is a ripe breeding ground for exaggeration and fabrication.

I have actually met many vegans in real life. I've been to various shows, talks, lectures, presentations and was one of the first members of the Fresh Network in the late nineties. I met Chrissie Hynde and Benjamin Z in Friends House in Holborn in the early noughties at a vegan festival, and myself and wife used to organise pot-lucks for the Fresh Network South West London area. I have even presented a talk myself at a Marcus Evans "Functional Foods" conference in Amsterdam 2007, it was a bit like a TED talk before TED became a thing. (and I was terrible, lol) I've met bare vegans. As far as I'm concerned that carries a lot more weight than interacting with anonymous and often obnoxious randoms on the internet.

The number of alleged bad experiences reported by non vegans is at odds with my real life interactions which is why I'm assuming that a fair number of them are straight up lies or at best exaggerations and misrepresentations.

I have been in a burger restaurant in Sweden when an AR demo of about 3 people tried to smash the window but it was plate glass. The stick they were using (a hockey stick I think) just kept bouncing off but it made a hell of a noise inside.
Wow, "dat sample size doh", lol. I'm not sure what you're trying to get at with these conveniently cherry picked anecdotes, but anyway seeing as you mentioned it, I also have an veggy anecdote of my own based in Stockholm where I worked for a couple of weeks on a project in December 2008. On my first day there I was invited to lunch with the team, they were going to a steakhouse which was apparently very good according to them. When lunchtime came and on the short walk to the eatery, one of the guys asked "you're not vegetarian are you?". "Actually, yes I am" I replied. "Yeah right", he said...and we carried on walking. I'm not sure what made him ask that question, but anyway when it was time to order, I had a plate of chips and an orange juice, and the dude that asked the question earlier, his jaw dropped. "So you really ARE vegetarian!". Apparently he didn't believe me and thought I was joking. He said I didn't look like a vegetarian (whatever one of those is supposed to look like). :rolleyes:

While I was there I definitely did not hit any plate glass windows with hockey sticks. I also remember some years previously working in Frankfurt and we had a team dinner in a some kind of meat place where it was literally only meat that was served, no side dishes, no potatoes, no salads, nada...just sizzling meat served on what looked like thick slabs of slate roof tiles. So I didn't eat anything and just had water or a soft drink. I have had so many REAL LIFE experiences and not just internet interactions, too many to mention including an attempt to order a salad in a snooty Paris restaurant during another team dinner and a leaving do at a Brazillian meat place in Plaza Mayor, Malaga. I won't bore you with any more.

You haven't been abused on this thread and neither has Veganomics. Ddraig has copped a bit because he has masses of form and his posts here have been true to it.
I don't think I ever said that I have been abused, however I agree with veganomics that there does appear to be a rather unfriendly vibe. I have no idea about the history of beef in the forum between members, but regardless, imo it's a bit hypocritical to make such a big deal out of the use of the word "carnism" claiming that it's emotive, loaded and confrontational when the tone and language used and the relentless goading by those of your persuasion has been rather unfriendly. I don't really want to get into personalities here but I didn't think that anything that ddcraig posted in this thread merited some of the more ugly responses. It would probably be better for him if he was able to keep his cool and not rise to the taunts and sneers because it would appear that that's what the people trying to provoke want because then they can say "see look...proof right there...an angry vegan...told you so."
 
I= I don't really want to get into personalities here but I didn't think that anything that ddcraig posted in this thread merited some of the more ugly responses. It would probably be better for him if he was able to keep his cool and not rise to the taunts and sneers because it would appear that that's what the people trying to provoke want because then they can say "see look...proof right there...an angry vegan...told you so."
This is waaaaay wide of the mark.
 
I've always thought it rather odd for people to be defined by what they don't do.

Perhaps it depends on how they don't do it?

tshirt-antifascist-action-d0010438182.png
 
Vegans dont scare me, or upset me AT ALL. Because I have loads of dishes that I adore making which are vegan and I must say, vegans, meateaters and anyone who isnt a vegan adores :).:thumbs:
 
OK, I'll get it out in the open. I'm vegan, pleased to meet you.

I'm vegan because I believe we should treat animals much better in this world, and the environment, and our own health.

There's an argument between vegans that seems to be gathering pace. Some vegans claim that you can be vegan and eat honey, drink beer with fish bladder in it... Other vegans think that you have to be 100% vegan or get to f***. Those in the latter group tend to be quite militant/vegans.

My question to the good people of Urban75 is this. Do angry vegans make you want to shout bacon in their face? Do angry vegans make you think say oh f*** off would you? Are you more receptive to a non judgemental, the right side of sanity vegan? Or do you still want to shout bacon in their face?

I'd be grateful of responses.

I'm not a vegan because I don't want to be a vegan. Whether one vegan yells in my face; or another one quietly hands me a pamphlet with a smile on her/his face, is not going to make a difference.

My not being a vegan is about me; it's not about vegans.
 
must be if lbj says it is! he is the expert as always :rolleyes:
thanks PaoloSanchez
His response seemed a little on the weak side, vague and non specific. It's best not to rise to any of the taunts and sly digs. It's the equivalent of "feeding the trolls". I'd be quite happy to have a civilised discussion with anyone who's up for that. When I get time later on I might explore the issue that appears causing irritation amongst some of the naysayers, ie that fundamentalist and thoroughly unreasonable nasty vegans refuse to accept that killing animals for no good reason is an ok thing to do. How bloody dare they, the scoundrels.
 
When I get time later on I might explore the issue that appears causing irritation amongst some of the naysayers, ie that fundamentalist and thoroughly unreasonable nasty vegans refuse to accept that killing animals for no good reason is an ok thing to do.
You mean the conversation that LBJ has been trying to have with you all along but that you've eschewed in favour of of passive aggression and snide comments?

That'll be interesting :thumbs:
 
When I get time later on I might explore the issue that appears causing irritation amongst some of the naysayers, ie that fundamentalist and thoroughly unreasonable nasty vegans refuse to accept that killing animals for no good reason is an ok thing to do.

But we're not talking about killing animals for no good reason. We're talking about killing animals for food, which is a good reason.

The fact I or anyone else don't eat them myself is neither here nor there, or it's not a discussion, it's just advocacy.
 
Back
Top Bottom