Why are we human? If not to have choices - And what could be a more noble choice than to choose not to consume the flesh of an living, breathing, thinking animal?
Don't try to confuse the issue with your "scientific" terms - It's obscene to eat the flesh of another - In future years, it'll be looked upon in much the same way as cannibalism is now.
Why are we human?
The claims on the glorious future predicated on your inevitable victory is also something that has turned up a few times on this thread.
It's very much infused with Christian tropes. Do you see the enlightenment coming within your own lifetime?
I think people have had enough of experts.
Don't try to confuse the issue with your "scientific" terms - It's obscene to eat the flesh of another - In future years, it'll be looked upon in much the same way as cannibalism is now.
There is no why.
Don't try to confuse you with facts. OK.
Do militant vegans dream of electric sheep?
I think you might be onto something with the holocaust schiz. For some reason I've never looked at it like that.Obviously there is no "why", except the "why" we have the power to make for ourselves - And, AFAIC, that "why", is to do what we can to prevent the continuation of the animal holocaust.
You were the one bringing "science" into the debate.
I don't think you know what normal means. Note, I'm not saying vegans are abnormal but claiming meat eating isn't normal... You think it's perverse. But it's clearly normal. A normative practise in much of the world since forever.
Yes, I see myself as enlightened - Because I am enlightened. In much the same way the abolitionists were enlightened. What of it?
Ignorant or uncaring, as opposed to having a different worldview that leads them to honestly disagree?
Trump supporters 'honestly disagree' with me, that doesn't add any credence to their opinions.
I think you might be onto something with the holocaust schiz. For some reason I've never seen it like that.
Absolutely. But it doesn't mean they're being paid to not agree with you.
So much to pick from but I'll go for this.Why are they "interesting"? People stuff themselves with the remains of other living creatures? And you find that "interesting"? Are you a psychopath? (Redundant question because you won't know if you are one).
Good feeling, yeah?
Not trying to be thick here but I don't get what this means, can you rephrase it?
None of those comparisons you've chosen is a) accurate or b) comparable.He means it isn't right. Public morality and what is normative is constantly changing - 200 years ago all the men on this thread would have considered it morally right and normative to beat or rape their wives.
If we're white British, we would have considered ourselves morally superior to black people or the Irish.
Popular morality changes, the norm changes, and conservatives don't want to let go of their old, incorrect views.
Veganism will be huge in 200 years time. But it will take that long for popular perceptions to turn around.
Concentration camps?... how else can one describe the grotesque death-factories that we call abattoirs apart from a holocaust?
So much to pick from but I'll go for this.
Stuffing oneself with the remains of sentient (I'll be kind and edit you here, you mean sentient no doubt) beings is worthy of italics. Just saying the words is enough to demonstrate its wrongness. It is an analytic truth, for you and for others on here too.
No, not at all - It horrifies me that so many so-called "reasonable" people can seemingly willingly participate (or at least participate by doing nothing to prevent it) in a holocaust.
Concentration camps?
I think you protest too much here.
Good feeling to be righteous crusader before his time.
Don't you think?
Obviously the tortured stance is part of the deal.
The fight is always better than the victory.