Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Do angry vegans turn you against going vegan?

Why are we human? If not to have choices - And what could be a more noble choice than to choose not to consume the flesh of an living, breathing, thinking animal?
 
The claims on the glorious future predicated on your inevitable victory is also something that has turned up a few times on this thread.
It's very much infused with Christian tropes. Do you see the enlightenment coming within your own lifetime?

Yes, I see myself as enlightened - Because I am enlightened. In much the same way the abolitionists were enlightened. What of it?
 
Don't try to confuse you with facts. OK.

Carry on consuming the cooked flesh of once living, breathing creatures - Rest assured that not too far into the future, your desires will be considered no less abhorrent than those of the paedophile.
 
Obviously there is no "why", except the "why" we have the power to make for ourselves - And, AFAIC, that "why", is to do what we can to prevent the continuation of the animal holocaust.
I think you might be onto something with the holocaust schiz. For some reason I've never looked at it like that.
 
I don't think you know what normal means. Note, I'm not saying vegans are abnormal but claiming meat eating isn't normal... You think it's perverse. But it's clearly normal. A normative practise in much of the world since forever.

He means it isn't right. Public morality and what is normative is constantly changing - 200 years ago all the men on this thread would have considered it morally right and normative to beat or rape their wives.

If we're white British, we would have considered ourselves morally superior to black people or the Irish.

Popular morality changes, the norm changes, and conservatives don't want to let go of their old, incorrect views.

Veganism will be huge in 200 years time. But it will take that long for popular perceptions to turn around.
 
I think you might be onto something with the holocaust schiz. For some reason I've never seen it like that.

No, I know when I'm being ridiculed - But I'm right - All Lives matter, whether human or animal - And how else can one describe the grotesque death-factories that we call abattoirs apart from a holocaust? It's not hyperbolic to call it a holocaust, it's underestimating the seriousness to compare the animal holocaust with the WW2 holocaust.
 
Why are they "interesting"? People stuff themselves with the remains of other living creatures? And you find that "interesting"? Are you a psychopath? (Redundant question because you won't know if you are one).
So much to pick from but I'll go for this.

Stuffing oneself with the remains of sentient (I'll be kind and edit you here, you mean sentient no doubt) beings is worthy of italics. Just saying the words is enough to demonstrate its wrongness. It is an analytic truth, for you and for others on here too.
 
Not trying to be thick here but I don't get what this means, can you rephrase it?

There was the stuff earlier about the scientist who had changed his mind about whether carb loading was necessarily a good idea.
It was assumed among some vegan posters that he had been paid off.
 
He means it isn't right. Public morality and what is normative is constantly changing - 200 years ago all the men on this thread would have considered it morally right and normative to beat or rape their wives.

If we're white British, we would have considered ourselves morally superior to black people or the Irish.

Popular morality changes, the norm changes, and conservatives don't want to let go of their old, incorrect views.

Veganism will be huge in 200 years time. But it will take that long for popular perceptions to turn around.
None of those comparisons you've chosen is a) accurate or b) comparable.
 


This is quite good. It's an hour long. It was shown on BBC2 about fifteen years ago, I remember watching it at the time.

I think it's a little pro-vegan/veggie, but still a fairly neutral look at the meat industry. I cannot be a part of this, what happens. It's horrific.
 
So much to pick from but I'll go for this.

Stuffing oneself with the remains of sentient (I'll be kind and edit you here, you mean sentient no doubt) beings is worthy of italics. Just saying the words is enough to demonstrate its wrongness. It is an analytic truth, for you and for others on here too.

Actually say something, will you? "It is an analytic truth, for you and for others on here too." What's that actually supposed to mean? It's self evidently wrong to eat animals - That's what I'm saying & there's no need to bring all your wibble into it.
 
No, not at all - It horrifies me that so many so-called "reasonable" people can seemingly willingly participate (or at least participate by doing nothing to prevent it) in a holocaust.

I think you protest too much here.
Good feeling to be righteous crusader before his time.

Don't you think?

Obviously the tortured stance is part of the deal.
The fight is always better than the victory.
 
I think you protest too much here.
Good feeling to be righteous crusader before his time.

Don't you think?



Obviously the tortured stance is part of the deal.
The fight is always better than the victory.

Keep telling yourself that. As I'm sure, the concentration camp guards told themselves - Which side do you want to be on?
 
Back
Top Bottom