oooh a study!! must be true ehInteresting study linked off of the J-Vine story: Turns out vegan diets aren't so good for the environment
you're not helping it Leon, why is that?you clearly are bothered by vegans and their choices, why is that? what difference does it make to you?
you're not helping it Leon, why is that?
Who is Leon?you're not helping it Leon, why is that?
Do you have a better study? I'd be happy to take a look. I'm not entirely sure what your attitde is in service to but your instincts are off kilter.oooh a study!! must be true eh
what you say about this graphic in the link you provided?
And the conclusion:Interesting study linked off of the J-Vine story: Turns out vegan diets aren't so good for the environment
The findings of this study support the idea that dietary change towards plant-based diets has significant potential to reduce the agricultural land requirements of U.S. consumers and increase the carrying capacity of U.S. agricultural resources. Future work is needed to determine the best way to share this productive bounty with the rest of the world, but potential for dietary change to influence land requirements and carrying capacity is clear. Diet composition matters.
Why don't you tell me all the good things...about your mother
oooh a study!! must be true eh
Is there a reason why you think I shouldn't post a study that doesn't explicitly advocate the diet I chose?And the conclusion:
Quality self-pwnage there.
So you're just another dickhead then?I'm not the one making assertions
if you're going to make them, back them up
I just thought it was worth mentioning, but apparently that's not a credible reason to post something on aninternet forum with angry vegans aboardNot actually a ‘study’, really.
Would be interested to see the input parameters.
Never heard of that journal, mind.
pardon?? how am i?So you're just another dickhead then?
How's this for starters,I'm not the one making assertions
if you're going to make them, back them up
you clearly are bothered by vegans and their choices, why is that? what difference does it make to you?
your entry and majority of posts on this thread claiming the vegan diet isn't sufficientHow's this for starters,
Feel free to back that up
Who is Leon?Do you have a better study? I'd be happy to take a look. I'm not entirely sure what your attitde is in service to but your instincts are off kilter.
I just thought it was worth mentioning, but apparently that's not a credible reason to post something on aninternet forum with angry vegans aboard
Indeed. But that's pretty much universally recognised anyway.It’s interesting and a difficult thing to attempt to quantify. I’ve worked in a similar area and with something like this the initial assumptions will have a major impact on the result.
If it supports anything, it’s that reducing meat consumption will have substantial environmental benefits.
your entry and majority of posts on this thread claiming the vegan diet isn't sufficient
I suggest your direct your inquiry to Dr Elden TyrellWho is Leon?
and it's been explained to you that you are wrongNope you asserted that I was bothered by the choices of vegans. Hadyou bothered to read the thread you'd notice that on multiple occasions I said the complete opposite. Saying the vegan diet isn't sufficient is also not the claim I made. The claim I made was that you don't get enough nutrition from plant food alone. Clearly vegans supplement their diet so it can be sufficient, however that is not my preference or desire. Feel free not to jump to shitty conclusions about someone the first time you talk to them, it makes you look a dickhead.
Indeed. But that's pretty much universally recognised anyway.
I've still no idea what you're on about but you can have a warning for breaking Rule #1 of these forums.I suggest your direct your inquiry to Dr Elden Tyrell
oooh a study!! must be true eh
what you say about this graphic in the link you provided?
Do you have a better study? I'd be happy to take a look. I'm not entirely sure what your attitde is in service to but your instincts are off kilter.
I'm guessing it assumes that the dairy production employs the same high yield, intensive, extra-cruel methods currently employed which some may argue isn't truly 'sustainable'. But I can't be arsed to look it up either.What that basically says is that if loads of people gave up meat everyone would have more to eat. This isn't a controversial opinion even, because livestock eat grain and veg crops humans could be eating instead, and the return on that fodder investment in terms of meat, weight for weight, is very small.
The interesting stat there is that a fully vegan diet is less sustainable than a dairy-vegetarian diet. If it were true, I'd be interested to know why that was. It might be argued that surrogate milks use even more water to produce than animal milk does, but I can't be arsed to look up figures. Someone who cares more can do that.
Of course not, but I was idly mulling whether such cruelty is sustainable in a world where animal welfare issues are becoming moot.I don't think cruelty figures in the stats, but that is a bit of different issue than sustainability.