that's your claim, but you haven't established thatYou also said numerous things which demonstrate that you don't know what a carb is.
that's your claim, but you haven't established thatYou also said numerous things which demonstrate that you don't know what a carb is.
I don't think I've read anything to suggest that vegans are particularly long-lived either; the idea that vegans (or vegetarians for that matter) are healthier because of what they avoid eating is an odd one. Off the top of my head I can think of three groups of people who tend to live longer and healthier lives than the norm (northern Italy, Okinawa, US seventh day adventists). The Italians eat meat, the Okinawans eat meat and fish and the longest lived adventists eat fish. Then there's the Graz study of vegetarians that found they suffer more ill-health than omnivores (nb - the study did not conclude that a vegetarian diet was responsible for this. It seems that scientists, unlike newspapers, know that if a study divides people into meat / non-meat eaters it doesn't necessarily mean that any effects discovered are down to the presence or absence of meat.)
There is evidence galore that eating whole grains, legumes and lots of vegetables and fruit has a beneficial effect on various disease markers as well as the subjective experience of good health, whether you take out the dead things or not.
You also said numerous things which demonstrate that you don't know what a carb is.
that's your claim, but you haven't established that
My claim was that you don't get everything you need from plants, eg Vitamin b12 (at least, i'm happy to concede the rest of what i listed since i'm not interested in going through it all).Well, I'm not where you've see a "fight", I think you've just made that up. I don't think anybody said that you had e problem with people eating vegan, another thing you've just made up. What you have said is that people can't get enough nutrition from plants.
Where have you backed up your rubbish opening statement that decent nutrition can't be had from plant based sources?
that's your claim, but you haven't established that
Why are you posting this and how do you think this answers my question?carbohydrate
kɑːbəˈhʌɪdreɪt/
noun
- any of a large group of organic compounds occurring in foods and living tissues and including sugars, starch, and cellulose. They contain hydrogen and oxygen in the same ratio as water (2:1) and typically can be broken down to release energy in the animal body.
lol, ok well, the production of human breast milk, as with all mammalian milks is a temporary arrangement, and that breast milk is created from whatever the mother has eaten, and in any case, for those who have a fetish for this sort of thing, the macronutrient ratio for human breast milk is similar to that of fruit. (quite a bit different to liver)No, if there was only *one* food created specifically for human consumption it would be human breast milk.
I'm trying to establish what we're proceeding with. I'm not interested in semantics and pedantryLet’s just proceed on the basis that glucose is a carb until you can get to a Biochem textbook from somewhere in the last 80 years or so.
I'm no expert on it but i would think breastmilk is the same regardless of waht the mother eats, at least fundamentally. It's not going to turn into cider if the mother starts eating lots of appleslol, ok well, the production of human breast milk, as with all mammalian milks is a temporary arrangement, and that breast milk is created from whatever the mother has eaten, and in any case, for those who have a fetish for this sort of thing, the macronutrient ratio for human breast milk is similar to that of fruit. (quite a bit different to liver)
I'm trying to establish what we're proceeding with. I'm not interested in semantics and pedantry and scienific definitions
no one was arguing the scientific defintion of a carbohydrate. You've misunderstood the conversation.FIFY
My claim was that you don't get everything you need from plants, eg Vitamin b12 (at least, i'm happy to concede the rest of what i listed since i'm not interested in going through it all).
no one was arguing the scientific defintion of a carbohydrate. You've misunderstood the conversation.
If what you're claiming is true then veg*ns would be struggling compared to omnivores, and yet you haven't provided any evidence to back that up. Am I supposed to just accept that as a fact just because you say it is?My claim was that you don't get everything you need from plants, eg Vitamin b12
You're straw manning me; I didn't make a claim that vegans were struggling. I said that meat is a better source of nutrition. Clearly vegans can supplement their diet and eat fortiied food products. I also said that wasn't something I endorsed or felt was part of a healthy diet. One shouldn't have to rely on supplements. If you want to, then be my guest.If what you're claiming is true then veg*ns would be struggling compared to omnivores, and yet you haven't provided any evidence to back that up. Am I supposed to just accept that as a fact just because you say it is?
lol, ok well, the production of human breast milk, as with all mammalian milks is a temporary arrangement, and that breast milk is created from whatever the mother has eaten, and in any case, for those who have a fetish for this sort of thing, the macronutrient ratio for human breast milk is similar to that of fruit. (quite a bit different to liver)
Again, vague nonsense with nothing to back it up with. The evidence would be in the outcomes, which would mean that those vegans would be missing out on "essential" nutrients only available in meat, and yet they appear on nearly every reliable measure to be doing better. You have yet to provide evidence to back up what you've said. That's not strawmanning at all. As Mr Cruise was forced to say "show me the money".You're straw manning me; I didn't make a claim that vegans were struggling. I said that meat is a better source of nutrition.
Well I have been vegetarian for 30 years and vegan for 20 years with no supplementation apart from an occasional B12 spray. My blood work is all within the normal range and compared to my peers, some of whom were very scathing of my dietry choice (I'm not suggesting that you are) I'm doing fine thanks. In fact two of my fiercest critics have already died from cancer.Clearly vegans can supplement their diet and eat fortiied food products. I also said that wasn't something I endorsed or felt was part of a healthy diet. One shouldn't have to rely on supplements. If you want to, then be my guest.
the production of human breast milk, as with all mammalian milks is a temporary arrangement
...and according to wiki lactase persistence is a fairly recent adaptation to the consumption of nonhuman milk, so it might be a bit of a stretch saying "we can drink it for as long as we like". Some of us can with no obvious symptoms, however "the majority of people around the world remain lactase nonpersistent".It is, but unlike other mammals, humanity has evolved in a way that most people continue producing lactase into adulthood, which means we uniquely can keep drinking milk of all kinds for as long as we like.
There was nothing vague therein at all.Again, vague nonsense with nothing to back it up with. The evidence would be in the outcomes, which would mean that those vegans would be missing out on "essential" nutrients only available in meat, and yet they appear on nearly every reliable measure to be doing better. You have yet to provide evidence to back up what you've said. That's not strawmanning at all. As Mr Cruise was forced to say "show me the money".
Well I have been vegetarian for 30 years and vegan for 20 years with no supplementation apart from an occasional B12 spray. My blood work is all within the normal range and compared to my peers, some of whom were very scathing of my dietry choice (I'm not suggesting that you are) I'm doing fine thanks. In fact two of my fiercest critics have already died from cancer.
...and according to wiki lactase persistence is a fairly recent adaptation to the consumption of nonhuman milk, so it might be a bit of a stretch saying "we can drink it for as long as we like". Some of us can with no obvious symptoms, however "the majority of people around the world remain lactase nonpersistent"
It so is. You claim that meat has better nutrition, but you have produced no evidence to back up your claim. Just repeating your claim doesn't magic it into truth.There was nothing vague therein at all.
Again, I'm not just going to accept that on your say so given that most of what you've written so far has been fairly low quality.Your other comment is just irrrelevant.
Your opposable digits comparison would work if the majority of "humanity" didn't have them, but all of us do have them even though some may be a bit less dexterous. The majority of humanity is not lactase-persistent.I know that, which is why i used the word ''humanity'' rather than humans, or people. Not every single actual person is lactase-persistent and yet it's true to say that humanity in general has evolved that trait. Similarly, I can't touch my thumb and little finger together without using my other hand to push them together, that doesn't mean humanity hasn't evolved opposable digits.