ddraig
kicking against the pricks...
tis and yes it willIt's not and it won't.
want to go round again?
tis and yes it willIt's not and it won't.
i think it will be confused with carnies, people who work for funfairsI've explained in some detail my objection to it.
Can you explain why you'd use 'carnist' which will not be widely understood and which is used inconsistently and ambiguously even on this one thread, as opposed to the factual, non-loaded and unambiguous 'meat eater' ?
There seems to be a bit too much emphasis on the terms used tbh which rather conveniently diverts attention away from the issue at hand. (I like them both, but meatheads be fumin')carrion cruncher is much better than carnist, i reckon.
I could make a new one up if you like. Veal crate facilitators? Male calf terminators? Maybe you could come up with better ones.Is there a word along similar lines that vegans use for dairy-eating vegetarians ?
tis and yes it will
want to go round again?
On many issues, yes. On this I simply don't want preaching twats telling me what I can and can't eat.you like telling people what's what and to be right and not be questioned
wouldn't be hard if that's the competitionThere seems to be a bit too much emphasis on the terms used tbh which rather conveniently diverts attention away from the issue at hand. (I like them both, but meatheads be fumin')
I could make a new one up if you like. Veal crate facilitators? Male calf terminators? Maybe you could come up with better ones.
I could make a new one up if you like. Veal crate facilitators? Male calf terminators? Maybe you could come up with better ones.
who here has told you what to eat?On many issues, yes. On this I simply don't want preaching twats telling me what I can and can't eat.
You want to live on veg? Fine by me. But I will continue to enjoy meat as long as I'm on this earth.
I respectfully disagree. There are consequences associated with people choice of food. If some people just wanted to eat human flesh because it tasted really good, most modern civilised people would agree that would definitely NOT be ok, although it might have been acceptable a few hundred years ago in certain parts of the world. I think much of the objections that meateaters have to certain words is that those words lift the veil and make more people aware of the consequences of their dietary practices.There isn't a gameplan. People just eat what they want to eat. If you have a gameplan to change people's desires, it is going to require communication rather than adversarial nonsense.
You can't have a war if the other side isn't a side, doesn't know it's fighting and doesn't care what you do.
Carnies. Circus folk. Nomads. Smell like cabbage. Small hands.
Over the years on here? Plenty of people, almost certainly including you at some point.who here has told you what to eat?
It does not have to be adversarial at all.
See, the argument against eating human flesh is easy - it involves eating people.I respectfully disagree. There are consequences associated with people choice of food. If some people just wanted to eat human flesh because it tasted really good, most modern civilised people would agree that would definitely NOT be ok
Nobody's biting because nobody can be arsed with it any more. The moral argument can't be won by either side, nothing new or groundbreaking can be said, and it just goes round in boring old circles.Cow rapists? I find people always come round to my way of thinking once I've called them a rapist a few times.
At some point you have to decide which is more important to you, animal welfare or the moral high ground. If the former, you might need to look into moderating your language. Deliberately raising people's heckles, that's not about fewer animals being harmed. It's about you.
E2a: And your slurs aren't even catchy ffs. If you want people to take the bait and get into a row with you, I suggest you invest in some rudimentary wit.
link us up then, otherwise not trueOver the years on here? Plenty of people, almost certainly including you at some point.
Out in the real world I've had stand up rows with dickheads over my meat eating, particularly in my road protesting days, but then idiot hippies and that scene kinda went hand in hand
like feminazi init
"look someone daring to have a different opinion that goes against mine, let's ridicule and destroy them and their arguments/different way of life"
Being highly critical of anyone who doesn't breastfeed, seeing bottle feeding as a maternal failure, and valorising breast milk as a substance with particularly magical powers beyond anything the evidence supports.Militant breastfeeders eh? Struggling to think how that would work.
yeh. they'll be confused with carlists pa... let's call them carnists!
oh come on, a single term isn't comparable to the massive hyperbole and abuse vegis and vegans have had on here for years by you bees and other boring knobs... let's call them carnists!
Or those known for their carnal desires...yeh. they'll be confused with carlists pa
How about cow baby milk stealers?Cow rapists? I find people always come round to my way of thinking once I've called them a rapist a few times.
So you are now making the big and false assumption that I am somehow out to convert people, which is nonsense. Similar to what PaoloSanchez said and I agree with him, I'll express my point of view. If you agree that's fine, if you disagree that's also fine. I find it rather funny and ironic that so called "normal" people are free to use derogatory language when describing vegans and nobody bats an eyelid, but my use of the innocuous word carnists is somehow "deliberately raising peoples heckles". What utter one sided nonsense.At some point you have to decide which is more important to you, animal welfare or the moral high ground. If the former, you might need to look into moderating your language. Deliberately raising people's heckles, that's not about fewer animals being harmed. It's about you.
That's because they're not slurs, as I said earlier, they are terms of endearment, gentle ribbing and piss take. If you don't care for my word choices then you need not engage. It's not as if I am forcing you to reply, maybe you just can't help yourself. Try a bit of self control.E2a: And your slurs aren't even catchy ffs. If you want people to take the bait and get into a row with you, I suggest you invest in some rudimentary wit.
Well this is a fallacy. Sure individuals have been wound up on occasion, that happens with most topics here, but more often than not the abuse and snipeyness comes from your side. Most of the times that I can recall it's been about you taking things uber-personally and losing it a bit. All that's required then are a few well placed needles to get you really throwing your toys out of the pram.oh come on, a single term isn't comparable to the massive hyperbole and abuse vegis and vegans have had on here for years ...
This carnist fragility thing you keep banging on about, what is it?highlights the carnist fragility well though ...
Our key hunting skill is our endurance,. Almost everything can run faster than us, very little can run further than us.apex predators are only apex predators because of whatever tools they have - for us its our brain, our language, and our ability to use tools. take that away and we're just really big, really slow Dodo's - same with a Great White Shark - its an apex predator because of its size, strength, sensory capability, speed and teeth - take one of those way and its just a big Tuna.