keybored
Well done. You remember cat good.
I have reported this veiled threat. Have a word with yourself you thug.Might even save some real life violence from happening
I have reported this veiled threat. Have a word with yourself you thug.Might even save some real life violence from happening
So what? can you back up your posts or not? What don't I get?
You going to pick up anyone else for their arguing? or posting explicit pics?
I disagree. Germany and Argentina are far more talented than Colombia, that it went wrong for them along the way doesnt change that.Colombia were far more impressive than Argentina or Germany. And Sweden won three matches out of four, including putting three past Mexico.
Threat to who??I have reported this veiled threat. Have a word with yourself you thug.
England did well to get that far. They made columbia and sweden - who are both quite decent teams - look shit and had croatia on the back foot until half time. Narrowly losing to an excellent croatia team is not proof that england were "shit".
We dont know how they'd have faired in the other half of the draw - But who else was better then england? france, belgium, croatia and brazil - maybe spain - but Id say england were a better team then Germany and Argentina - and would have had a good chance of beating any of the others.
They are not world class - but they are better then they have been for many years and had a pretty good go.
What does this mean ? who is this aimed at ? Posters here or England fans in general ?hate and anger has to go somewhere right! Might even save some real life violence from happening
Fair dos. I take it all back.5th easiest passage to the final in the modern format (32 teams).
There have been much easier passages before that, of course.
Not unprecedented, but a massive missed opportunity.
France's route to the final has been the 4th hardest.
Germany were awful and Argentina were all over the place. Colombia were packed with attacking talent, although James being injured helped England a lot (as Cavani being injured helped France, tbf).I disagree. Germany and Argentina are far more talented than Colombia, that it went wrong for them along the way doesnt change that.
I disagree. Germany and Argentina are far more talented than Colombia, that it went wrong for them along the way doesnt change that.
What I meant was a partner/house mate, Croation or innocent member of the public by containing the abuse and anger here
more like a 66.66666666666% to 33.333333333% game to be correctI agree with you. Tonight was a 50/50 game and England could have even made it to the final, but we should be grateful it even got this far. England are likeable, have played pretty well but imagine what France would have done to us in the final. We're not good enough to win it. It was a good run, and we've been a team well worth rooting for.
I agree with you. Tonight was a 50/50 game and England could have even made it to the final, but we should be grateful it even got this far. England are likeable, have played pretty well but imagine what France would have done to us in the final. We're not good enough to win it. It was a good run, and we've been a team well worth rooting for.
Threat to who??
What I meant was a partner/house mate, Croation or innocent member of the public by containing the abuse and anger here
No threat from me so your report is pathetic and laughable
more like a 66.66666666666% to 33.333333333% game to be correct
more like a 66.66666666666% to 33.333333333% game to be correct
I really doubt you are managing to upset anyone with this performance - your aim presumably. You are just looking like a right div.more like a 66.66666666666% to 33.333333333% game to be correct
Is it not a valid term or spelling?
What's a Croation anyway? Aren't you the guy who always leaps on people who misspell Colombia?
Was it not 2 goals to 1?I really doubt you are managing to upset anyone with this performance - your aim presumably. You are just looking like a right div.
3 million population, chronic underfunding of the game at every level and direct competition in the (relatively small) population centres with rugby for the finest athletes. HTHYeah. Uruguay and Croatia keep doing well don't they? Why are Wales so shit?
Yes, you're very gracious.Is it not a valid term or spelling?
Sorry if wrong, I can admit when i'm wrong at least!
Apologies then, how did I word/spell it wrong? thanksYes, you're very gracious.
There are 4 million people you need to direct your apology to. I am not one of them.Apologies then, how did I word/spell it wrong? thanks
3 million population, chronic underfunding of the game at every level and direct competition in the (relatively small) population centres with rugby for the finest athletes. HTH
Wales will never ever even get to a semi-final of a World Cup even though countries with small populations regularly do. You'd have to be really, really shit for that to be the case. You'd end up sad, bitter, twisted and obsessed by your bigger closer neighbour, having to live your dreams out via some kind of negative proxy when they lose.
I've said numerous times that Wales aren't good enough, where's the bitterness?Wales will never ever even get to a semi-final of a World Cup even though countries with small populations regularly do. You'd have to be really, really shit for that to be the case. You'd end up sad, bitter, twisted and obsessed by your bigger closer neighbour, having to live your dreams out via some kind of negative proxy when they lose.
Rugby exists in Uruguay. Stretch to call it popular.Uruguay. Population of 3.5 million. Not dripping with cash. Rugby also popular there. You haven't helped so don't be happy.
See above post. Haven’t seen Uruguay in an elite international semi final recently and I very much doubt that rugby has such a pull on a limited pool of talent. I’ll stay happy if that’s ok with you, perhaps more so now I’ve clocked how pissed off you areUruguay. Population of 3.5 million. Not dripping with cash. Rugby also popular there. You haven't helped so don't be happy.