Chavez tells Blair to "Go right to hell"
- Thread starter X-77
- Start date
rogue yam said:
| don't know about N K, funnily enough none of my friends have been there on enjoyable and unchaperoned holidays. Obviously, there are/have been plenty of dictators who blah blah. Good diversion. Cubans could have got rid of Castro any time, but I would venture, not enough of them want to.
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
ViolentPanda said:
Your memory is faulty. That was directed at nino, not at the boards in general.
Check back if you think I'm wrong.
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
foggypane said:
Sort of like the Iraqis could have gotten rid of Saddam if they didn't like him?
spring-peeper
Well-Known Member
Johnny Canuck2 said:
Really glad you posted that - I've thought the same thing when I read his post.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Johnny Canuck2 said:
You're the lowest of the low. You have just lied to VP but have the affrontery to claim that it was "directed at me". You're pathetic and a liar.
The proof is here.
There is simply no way that you can claim that this post was directed at me...ah, but you're ignoring me and the reason is obvious: I expose your lies
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
not while the US was propping up his regime, no!Johnny Canuck2 said:
after that, quite possibly.
for the record; neither the Ba'ath or Saddam would EVER have taken control of Iraq without active US connivance and support.
makes you proud, eh?
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Johnny Canuck2 said:
Johnny, you're dissembling.
Whether your original pissing, moaning and whining was directed entirely at one particular person is irrelevant, the fact that you actually threatened and carried out your threat so is what is relevant.
What's also relevant is your asking me whether I'd snitch on you for the multiple C & Ps you made without posting comment. Projection of one's own less admirable traits onto others is a very sad thing, and I believe that you realise that and perhaps feel some little shame at your actions.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
and, err, can you prove or substantiate any of these ridiculous assertions?rogue yam said:
btw, its' founder was NOT a socialist - in fact IIRC he supported the Liberal Party in the UK. he did however have a passionate concern for human rights.
KeyboardJockey
Clowns to the Left of me
rogue yam said:
Utter bollocks as usual. The last thing I would call AI is 'socialistic'
KeyboardJockey
Clowns to the Left of me
vimto said:
Quite a few of RY's list of 'unfree' nations he popped up with earlier on another thread..
Quoted from RY on the other thread about Condo Rice.
'You talk crap. Any list of countries less free and democratic than the United States must also include Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Angola, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Belarus, Bhutan, Brunei, Burundi, Cambodia, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Colombia, Congo, Cote d’Ivoire, Egypt, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Guinea, Haiti, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Liberia, Libya, Malawi, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nepal, North Korea, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Rwanda, Sierra Leon, Somalia, Sudan, Swaziland, Tajikistan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Uganda, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Vietnam, Yemen, and Zimbabwe. I've seen you post a lot of stupid lies to this site, but this might be your most worthless post yet. You are a disgrace.'
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
as a matter of interest, do you actually know ANYTHING about Cuba, other than that some guy called Castro is in charge? No? thought not.rogue yam said:
Just for the record, Tio Fidel is a HUGELY popular leader. I have witnessed myself, in conversation late at night, in smoky bars in downtown havana. The Cuban people love him for his charisma, and the pride he has given them, and for delivering them from ANOTHER dictatorship - one installed and maintained by an unholy alliance of CIA, Mafia, and US Govt. you remember him, yes? Fellow called Batista?
And, btw, no citizen of a nation which has installed and supported as many barbaric and tyrannical regimes as yours has, has ANY business shouting 'dictator! dictator!" at any other nation or its' people.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
Red Jezza said:
We're always getting this feeble nonsense from the bushbots and neo cons, who always make the same accusations as their programmers (and will often cite some right wing article somewhere)...but none of them have ever talked to any Cubans, apart from those mobsters living in Miami whose views on Castro are one-sided. Does RY think that Cuba was a perfect paradise before the revolution...or does he believe that the former fixed floating brothel/casino was a paragon of democracy?
Fuck him, he doesn't even know who Batista was.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
absolutely. RY's amnesia on the US's, umm, patchy record on assisting democracy elsewhere is quite remarkable.
btw; RY, one other thing you don't know about Cuba; by and large, and with exceptions, the Cuban people enjoy more freedom under castro than they did under Batista, and prolly under any other ruler before that.
btw; RY, one other thing you don't know about Cuba; by and large, and with exceptions, the Cuban people enjoy more freedom under castro than they did under Batista, and prolly under any other ruler before that.
ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
phildwyer said:
And I sense orally-vented flatus from you here.
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
phildwyer said:
I sense an agenda and more of the same auld shite from our Lord and chief fuckwit dwyer here.
Is Johnny paying you much to help him out?
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
phildwyer said:
It's funny how no one ever rushes to your aid - isn't it? But then who, in their right mind, would offer assistance to raving egomaniac and liar like you? Johnny Canuck perhaps but no one else.
You and Johnny are made for each other. I hope you will be truly happy together...when is the wedding?
Oh, I don't need anyone to come to my aid. VP recognises you for the waste of space you are and takes the piss accordingly.
rogue yam
Originally Posted by rogue yam
"AI has an agenda which is socialistic world government. They "do" whatever they think will best serve this goal. The concept of "accuracy" is promoted to mask their role as an advocate of a particular political system. AI is "taken seriously" in direct proportion to whether one supports their goal."
please present your information on this accusation.
Originally Posted by rogue yam
"AI has an agenda which is socialistic world government. They "do" whatever they think will best serve this goal. The concept of "accuracy" is promoted to mask their role as an advocate of a particular political system. AI is "taken seriously" in direct proportion to whether one supports their goal."
please present your information on this accusation.
KeyboardJockey
Clowns to the Left of me
Ing_soc said:
I'd be interested to hear RY's 'evidence' as well. You might have to chase him round the boards to get some sort of answer (which will probably turn out to be some old cack from Fox news unfortunately)
nino_savatte
No pasaran!
rogue yam said:
I'm surprised you didn't chuck the ACLU or the NEA in there.
Are the only approved organisations those which advocate violence and death and the industries that support those things? Organisations like the NRA, The Heritage Foundation, The Daughters of the American Revolution, The Confederate Sons of America...oh, did I mention them? Silly me...but they are up your street - non?
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
oh ffs, that's ridiculous! I worked, as a volunteer, at the GLOBAL HQ of amnesty. it's CRAMMED with wussy middle-of-the-road liberals. The whole ethos of the organisation and one of its' charter's key points is to have no PERMANENT, fixed alliance with any political party.
Similar threads
- Poll
