What
kabbes said. Do you even listen to yourself? You're making confident prognostications of unprecedented events based on absolutely zero evidence.
No it's not. Crypto is about fucking making money. Even if we ignore the fact speculation is why cryptocurrency took off in the first place (to the moon!), you also gave away the acquisitiveness which permeates crypto culture when you boasted about the six grand you got for producing fuck-all of value.
I don't see how any fascist would have a problem with getting funding by minting a bunch of NFTs and selling them for stupid prices to people with more money than sense. Remember you're talking about a technological tool, not some kind of ideological analysis. You don't need to subscribe to the Soviet brand of socialism (or even be left-wing at all) in order to effectively operate an AK-47. The AK can be repaired with pig iron and baling twine, and while this does make it useful for left-wing insurgents, that's also useful to right-wing insurgents. Why should fascists give a fuck about the decentralised nature of crypto? That just means that there's nobody within that technical space with the authority to comprehensively shut them out. Which gives them opportunities to operate. Especially when they can anonymously acquire work and funding for their projects, because as you said: "In a permissionless blockchain, unless programmed otherwise, you don't know the chraracteristics[sic] of the other parties involved, ergo, it's impossible to discriminate."
One of you two - can't be bothered to scroll back, admitted that people wouldn't be enthusastic about CBDCs.
Funnily enough, the WEF, FATF, BIS, FSB and the Bank of England (and just about every central bank) are painfully aware of this.
So why are they still bothering to develop CBDCs?
Because they want to get around the fact that public won't embrace them.
If they trash the dollar, the pound, the Euro - all that debt that goes with them is destroyed and the government gets control only they can dream of. If they fail in their objectives, they will lose a lot of power.
If you understood the dynamics of it, you would understand that either the government takes full spectrum control of our lives with digitial passports and CBDCs OR decentralised currencies
eventually would strip governments of most of their power.
There is NO inbetween, it's a bitter battle to the end.
Governments will either have to work out a way to destroy cryptos or control them AND from there rule the people with an iron fist like the Communists in China to ensure that they are never threatended by descentralistion ever again.
It's a polarising issue like Brexit.
The Brexiteers want us to diverage from the EU so hard, that it would never be possible for us to join the EU. The rejoiners want us to keep all EU laws, keep as much to same, so we can rejoin and then have us join the single currency so we can NEVER leave the EU even if we voted to.
It's CBDCs with authoritarian govt control OR it's a completely decntralised future where it starts at a grassroots level from the ground up.
Same with AI. Do you want an AI on your phone that you know has legit open source code, to have your back, that pools processing power with other people's mobile phones, that works in the same way, to fight off the forces of darkness, or do you want to cheer on a centralised corporate AI that works hand in hand with a centralised govt to work out how the British public would react to more draconian power graps?