They asked a lot of questions, and took about 15 minutes to call me back in for their decision, but made it as easy as they could telling me I had won and then explaining their decision, which was that they granted it under rule 35, the exceptional circumstances rule, as I didn't fully meet any of the descriptorsI won, backdated support group and for a further 12 months!!
Thank you for your support.
YES!I won, backdated support group and for a further 12 months!!<snip>
I won, backdated support group and for a further 12 months!!
Thank you for your support.
I won, backdated support group and for a further 12 months!!
Thank you for your support.
They asked a lot of questions, and took about 15 minutes to call me back in for their decision, but made it as easy as they could telling me I had won and then explaining their decision, which was that they granted it under rule 35, the exceptional circumstances rule, as I didn't fully meet any of the descriptors
Awesome Wells, I am not sure, but I think I don't have any more points, to be honest I haven't opened the document they gave me explaining their decision, its in a sealed envelope and I have started the evening by opening a bottle of wine.
They said they were giving it me for the backdated year and a further year as in the evidence from the CMHT, they had said they were hoping to be able to help me improve my mental health situation.
I have in the back of my head a bit of a concern that as I didn't meet the mobility descriptor fully (I had 9 points) that they may call me for review of DLA, which I have a lifetime award for now, but that is just a tiny niggle.
They asked a lot of questions, and took about 15 minutes to call me back in for their decision, but made it as easy as they could telling me I had won and then explaining their decision, which was that they granted it under rule 35, the exceptional circumstances rule, as I didn't fully meet any of the descriptors
Awesome Wells, I am not sure, but I think I don't have any more points, to be honest I haven't opened the document they gave me explaining their decision, its in a sealed envelope and I have started the evening by opening a bottle of wine.
They said they were giving it me for the backdated year and a further year as in the evidence from the CMHT, they had said they were hoping to be able to help me improve my mental health situation.
I have in the back of my head a bit of a concern that as I didn't meet the mobility descriptor fully (I had 9 points) that they may call me for review of DLA, which I have a lifetime award for now, but that is just a tiny niggle.
Sorry to hear that WouldBe - can your solicitor write to the A4e office and ask them to leave you alone?Congrats Celt
I'm still having problems with mine despite winning.
DWP are still withholding >£1K due to a possible overpayment.
Still heard nothing about severe disability payments while I was on JSA.
I've just had another letter from A4E for a mandatory appointment about getting me back to work. They were shown a letter last time I went in to say I was in the support group.
Maybe I need to send them a letter threatening legal action for harassment and fraud if they carry on.
Interesting...people can get into the support group even without getting 15 points. My CAB advisor is convinced that without the points (ie support for enough descriptors) I don't stand a chance.
Well done at any rate. A victory for one is a victory for all.
Congrats Celt
I'm still having problems with mine despite winning.
DWP are still withholding >£1K due to a possible overpayment.
Still heard nothing about severe disability payments while I was on JSA.
I've just had another letter from A4E for a mandatory appointment about getting me back to work. They were shown a letter last time I went in to say I was in the support group.
Maybe I need to send them a letter threatening legal action for harassment and fraud if they carry on.
I have a solicitor acting for me (at DLA tribunal). I'll have to contact him.That doesn't sound like a bad idea, do you have anyone acting for you, ? Advocacy or similar,?
I have a solicitor acting for me (at DLA tribunal). I'll have to contact him.
Still not got last years Christmas 'bonus' or cold weather payments yet either.
I have heard of that site, but its behind a paywall. So no. There are plenty of other sources, including here, where that information can be made freely available and the CAB seem helpful enough.Awesome Wells is there anyone else involved in your care that can write a supportive letter, amongst my evidence was a statement from a family member who gave a narrative of how life was for me as regards how my health problems impacted on the life.
Have you had a look at the http://www.benefitsandwork.co.uk/ site?
Nothing other than several Twitter posts yet, but the DWP has lost their appeal against the Supreme Court ruling on WCA assessments discriminating against the mentally ill, autistic etc.
E2A: This from Rethink:
https://www.rethink.org/media-centr...vernment-loses-appeal-against-benefits-ruling
Confirmed by the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25213633
"Unless the DWP takes the case to the Supreme Court"Nothing other than several Twitter posts yet, but the DWP has lost their appeal against the Supreme Court ruling on WCA assessments discriminating against the mentally ill, autistic etc.
E2A: This from Rethink:
https://www.rethink.org/media-centr...vernment-loses-appeal-against-benefits-ruling
Confirmed by the BBC: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-25213633
Just wait till next monday. Perhaps he'll save up his petulance, store it in some gland in his brain, and lose his shit completely then.We should expect another king-sized tantrum from Dunked-in Shit, then, the petty childish wanker.
Just wait till next monday. Perhaps he'll save up his petulance, store it in some gland in his brain, and lose his shit completely then.
Just wait till next monday. Perhaps he'll save up his petulance, store it in some gland in his brain, and lose his shit completely then.
I've heard, through the Civil Service grapevine, that he regularly "completely loses his shit" anyway. His dept has what an old mate described (in classic Civil Service fashion ) as "an anomalously-high turnover of mid-level and senior Civil Servants since the Secretary of State came onboard". In other words, he pisses off the people who work for him enough that they're willing to transfer out of a dept where their competencies lie, and take their chances elsewhere. Says a lot for Dunked-in Shit, doesn't it?
Remember when he said he'd bite a guy's balls off? That was fucked, I don't know why more wasn't made of that in the press. When you see lads bulling themselves up for a confrontation "I'll rip his head off", "I'll break his legs" etc are all fairly standard, but threatening to bite a bit of a person's anatomy off, that's taking it to another level.
Typical officer class - always thinking about the merry japes they had with the first years back when they were prefects at school.
Cheers mate, now I've got a mental image of IDS playing the biscuit game.
This has not improved my day.
Except that, no matter what you think of the officer class, DIS never really fitted in there either.Typical officer class - always thinking about the merry japes they had with the first years back when they were prefects at school.
I get the feeling that at school Dunked-in Shit often was the biscuit.