teqniq
DisMembered
Shameless propaganda from the Times here:
Britain falls out of love with the NHS: poll reveals three in five now expect delays
Britain falls out of love with the NHS: poll reveals three in five now expect delays
I'm not a fan of the Times, but I think the article is spot on. I can't argue with anything it's saying is going on.Shameless propaganda from the Times here:
Britain falls out of love with the NHS: poll reveals three in five now expect delays
Shameless propaganda from the Times here:
Britain falls out of love with the NHS: poll reveals three in five now expect delays
I agree with a lot more of what he says - the main point is that more money should mean more output.
The GP crisis could be helped by no fees for medical students, accommodation provided, and a bursary.
In return, doctors work as GPs (at the normal pay rates) for three years before moving on to specialise.
A big increase in Nurse Practitioner, Advanced Nurse Practitioner numbers. 90% of patients could be more than adequately treated by NPs.
A big increase in Nurse Practitioner, Advanced Nurse Practitioner numbers. 90% of patients could be more than adequately treated by NPs.
I agree with a lot more of what he says - the main point is that more money should mean more output.
But 90% of patients being seen by less qualified practitioners sounds like a step back from what we had until very recently?The GP crisis could be helped by no fees for medical students, accommodation provided, and a bursary.
In return, doctors work as GPs (at the normal pay rates) for three years before moving on to specialise.
A big increase in Nurse Practitioner, Advanced Nurse Practitioner numbers. 90% of patients could be more than adequately treated by NPs.
The GP crisis could be helped by no fees for medical students, accommodation provided, and a bursary.
In return, doctors work as GPs (at the normal pay rates) for three years before moving on to specialise.
A big increase in Nurse Practitioner, Advanced Nurse Practitioner numbers. 90% of patients could be more than adequately treated by NPs.
“One of the things that I do find frustrating, given that we have committed to more staff, I cannot understand why the BMA is so hostile to the idea that with more staff must come better standards for patients,” he said, accusing the union of “living on a different planet”.
But 90% of patients being seen by less qualified practitioners sounds like a step back from what we had until very recently?
I wonder.I wonder why the BMA could be against this ?
Alex
It Scotland (where I live), it is Nurse Practitioners and Advanced Nurse Practitioners.It's Advanced Clinical Practitioners (ACPs) not ANPs as they come from a range of previous medical backgrounds and then do a Masters level course of study, and the NHS long term plan is expanding that part of the workforce.
The training to be a GP is a specialism though, and takes years, so it doesn't work the way you suggest.
It Scotland (where I live), it is Nurse Practitioners and Advanced Nurse Practitioners.
Charging student nurses to study and removing bursaries is another insane thing the current lot have done.
Would love to know what % of student loans they think they will get back from nurses. I bet it’s not worth the hassle.
It's changing, you're just behind!
ANP is still used here in England as well in some places, usually by nurses who are ANPs and are a bit resistant to the change. But the move is towards ACPs across the board, and they will get central professional registration as such at some point - currently they hold their professional registration with their prior professional body (NMC, HCPC, etc.).
Could you cite a source for that?
All of it. I've looked online, and can find absolutely nothing to suggest that the nomenclature in Scotland is changing.What bit of it?
I mean...
He seems to be living on a different planet where the NHS has somehow got more staff, instead of the chronic shortage of staff it actually has.