Orang Utan
Psychick Worrier Ov Geyoor
Go on thenIt could also be argued that it draws people away from those things.
Go on thenIt could also be argued that it draws people away from those things.
Go on then
i would like you to confirm your post of 0745, that demos allow people to let off steam and let the govt off the hook.I didn't understand the post
It's in the State's best interests to allow people to demonstrate. It gives people the ability to let off steam thus avoiding the pressure cooker/revolutionary effect that suppressing demonstrations creates.I didn't understand the post
I agree with the former and am yet to be pwrsuaded of the latter.i would like you to confirm your post of 0745, that demos allow people to let off steam and let the govt off the hook.
Make the argument
Go on then
by letting people believe they"ve done their bit / made their point, demos forestall more radical action being take by most people. the govt can point at demos and say that's how you make your point in a democracy, not by eg invading raf fairford or assembling outside cabinet ministers' homes at 6am.I agree with the former and am yet to be pwrsuaded of the latter.
They'd be wrong thenYou do know that the people's assembly / owen jones / russel brand will just say the answer is to 'vote labour' yes?
by letting people believe they"ve done their bit / made their point, demos forestall more radical action being take by most people. the govt can point at demos and say that's how you make your point in a democracy, not by eg invading raf fairford or assembling outside cabinet ministers' homes at 6am.
No. Existentialist wrote 'Peterlee' (grim new town in the North East) when he obviously meant 'Peterloo' (place in Manchester where something irrelevant happened 200 years ago). So I posted a picture of Peterlee by way of gentle mockery. It was just an attempt to inject some levity into what is an otherwise turgid thread full of middle class people indulging in virtue signalling.
frankly if people just sat at home and did nothing at all then the country would grind to a standstill and the demands would be capitulated.Tbh I think the fact is that for most people taking 'more radical action' isn't an option, for a variety of reasons. Better they get out there and make a show of numbers than sit at home and do nothing at all IMO.
it's just that sort of 'virtue signalling' by poking fun at peterlee than i find distasteful.No. Existentialist wrote 'Peterlee' (grim new town in the North East) when he obviously meant 'Peterloo' (place in Manchester where something irrelevant happened 200 years ago). So I posted a picture of Peterlee by way of gentle mockery. It was just an attempt to inject some levity into what is an otherwise turgid thread full of middle class people indulging in virtue signalling.
That's a good side-effect of a march, if/when it occurs, but it'd be a pretty poor raison de marcher. IMO the problem is that often organisers don't organise beyond parlaying march attendees into members, and that sometimes loses the point of what the march was about in the first place.marches give people confidence. see my earlier post.
yeh but nowadays there are speeches before the march telling you why you're about to parade through the streets, and speeches after the march telling you why you've just marched through the streets.That's a good side-effect of a march, if/when it occurs, but it'd be a pretty poor raison de marcher. IMO the problem is that often organisers don't organise beyond parlaying march attendees into members, and that sometimes loses the point of what the march was about in the first place.
are they?Are the people pooh poohing demos saying they are a complete waste of time? That we shouldn't bother at all?
tbh they did dismiss the countryside alliance march, which was about 423,000 strong iirc. so it's not just 'left-wing' demos which are dismissed out of hand.An aside - 250,000 ish dismissed with a shrug & a bit of a sneer by the state & the press. If that was the far-right, it'd be a crisis. But the left? No relevance, no threat - & no perceived likelihood of demonstrations leading to further meaningful action. It's a bit dismal.
depends on what happens at the demoAre the people pooh poohing demos saying they are a complete waste of time? That we shouldn't bother at all?
every month?depends on what happens at the demo
don't think people are saying not to bother but how much effort goes and money into them and they are then ignored
do you think doing a march like the weekend a year is enough? every 6 months?
Do you think the march would have had an effect on the outcome of the GE if it had been held at the end of April?Are the people pooh poohing demos saying they are a complete waste of time? That we shouldn't bother at all?
keep the peoples assembly busy at least!every month?
i ask again: are people pooh poohing demos saying they are a complete waste of time?Are the people pooh poohing demos saying they are a complete waste of time? That we shouldn't bother at all?
That's what I'm inferring from the dismissive commentsare they?
That's what I'm askingi ask again: are people pooh poohing demos saying they are a complete waste of time?
& i'm asking if they're asking.That's what I'm asking
so no one's actually said it, you're making it up.That's what I'm inferring from the dismissive comments
Of course not. We're going round in circles, I think. I've already given the reasons people demonstrate several times.Do you think the march would have had an effect on the outcome of the GE if it had been held at the end of April?