How'd you come across the thread?
I certainiy wish I had not. I'll move on to another one.
How'd you come across the thread?
I certainiy wish I had not. I'll move on to another one.
I looked at the last pages. I never saw such shameful fury before.
Wow, some shameful people here.... envy makes so ugly.
I looked at the last pages. I never saw such shameful fury before.
That didn't answer the question. Given that aside from liking one of Jazzz's posts and posting on here this is all you've done on urban...why this one? Do you even know who Laurie Penny is?
I read her aticles. Not good, not bad. Defintely not worth the fury shown here.
You must mean the bit where Laurie Penny baselessly libels everyone on the thread as rape apologists?
She has form for this too, having in the past had to publicly apologise to one of the posters after baselessly accusing him (a long term anti-racism campaigner) of being a racist.
are you referring to any shameful fury in particular, duck? xI looked at the last pages. I never saw such shameful fury before.
OK, I don't know about this. But I am very suprised to read so much vile hatred anyway.
So what compelled you to register here and find this thread and give us all a good ticking off?
So what compelled you to register here and find this thread and give us all a good ticking off?
are you referring to any shameful fury in particular, duck? x
I could quite happily kick Harris in the teeth. Fucking sex pest. I wouldn't trust him with an animal let alone a lass.
Actually you are the only one who has thought about what they wrote afterwards, and I think you felt sorry for what you said before.
Some others though display a very bad side of themselves here.
No it isnt contempt. Too much serious anger, they wish they were her.
Dave?
I looked at the last pages. I never saw such shameful fury before.
I'm sure those unnamed others would be happy to discuss this with you if you'd care to name them and be specific about what you're accusing them of doing.
Have you read it?! It is not an attack on class politics, it is an attack on narrow and dogmatic assumptions about what the struggle for socialism might mean, to whom it appeals and on what basis.
Which means you're drawing a conclusion that isn't contextually-based, but rather based on your opinion of what you've read in the last few pages.
It wasn't funny when it was done 600 pages ago and it's not funny now.
But that won't stop me nicking it and passing it off as my own sometime in the future teehee