el-ahrairah
forward communism, forward gerbils!
science fiction is a window into the soul of what a society wishes it could be
science fiction is a window into the soul of what a society wishes it could be
STOP TALKING ABOUT STAR TREK
In case it's not clear: I find Star Trek pretty shabby and with sharp slices of US anticommunism. But you're right, I don't want to have to watch it, to properly investigate its "problems" and relationship to society. It's laughably bad - phasers, stun, warp factor
Let us not forget the tragic fate of Mycah the butcher's boy.
Yes, sihhi. You watch Star Trek ironically. I believe you. Yes.
Fucking hell, what does that say about the Draka?
(not that I've read the Draka series)
"By the early 2020s, there was a place like this in every major city in the United States."
"Why are these people in here? Are they criminals?"
"No, people with criminal records weren't allowed in the Sanctuary Districts."
"Then what did they do to deserve this?"
"Nothing. They're just people without jobs or places to live."
"So they get put in here?"
"Welcome to the 21st century, doctor."
You could say the same for capitalism, imperialism, Islamophobia etc
Some help needed here on science fiction, Zoe Stavri posted this
http://www.socialjusticeleague.net/2011/09/how-to-be-a-fan-of-problematic-things
I'd never heard of Dune, but I don't get where the homophobia is even after googling.
In fact I don't know any of these things, but I don't get exactly what's being said.
Christ. I've just admitted watching "Scott Pilgrim vs. The World"!
considered to be o, I always took it as nameless frontierism in spaaaaace
never got on with it really. Hated the swashing of buckles. It's like the 90s never happened
And the geek shall inherit the earth
There is a certain type of nerd entitlement that is all too easily co-opted into a modern mythology of ruthless capitalist exploitation, in which the acquisition of wealth and status at all costs is phrased as a cheeky way of getting one's own back on those kids who were mean to you at school. As somebody whose only schoolfriends were my Dungeons & Dragons team, I understand all too well how every socialist and egalitarian principle can pale into insignificance compared to the overwhelming urge to show that unattainable girl or boy who spurned your dorky sixth-form advances just what they were missing.
The narrative whereby the nerdy loner makes a sack of cash and gets all the hot pussy he can handle is becoming a fundamental part of free-market folklore. It crops up in films from Transformers to Scott Pilgrim; it's the story of Bill Gates, of Steve Jobs, and now of Mark Zuckerberg. It's a story about power and about how alienation and obsessive persistence are rewarded with social, sexual and financial power.
The protagonist is invariably white and rich and always male -- Hollywood cannot countenance female nerds, other than as minor characters who transform into pliant sexbots as soon as they remove their glasses -- but these privileges are as naught compared to the injustice life has served him by making him shy, spotty and interested in Star Trek. He has been wronged, and he has every right to use his l33t skills to bend the engine of humanity to his purpose.
This logic is painful to me, as an out-and-proud nerd. For a person with a comics collection, an in-depth knowledge of the niceties of online fan fiction and a tendency to social awkwardness, it is distressing to see geekdom being annexed by the mythology of neoliberal self-actualisation.
There's far more to being a geek than maladaptive strategies that objectify other human beings as hostile obstacles who deserve to be used to serve the purpose of one's own ambition, but watching The Social Network, you wouldn't know it. For me, being a geek is about community, energy and celebration of difference -- but in the sterile fairytale of contemporary capitalism, successful geekery is about the rewards of power and the usefulness of commodifying other humans as a sum of likes, interests and saleable personal data.
The Scott Pilgrim critique is just plain daft. The whole impetus of the story is that young people are invariably shallow and fixated on self-gratification, and that's how almost all the characters act in the film. there's nothing racist, homophobic or sexist about it unless you fixate on minor issues of character that are entirely related to the shallowness of said characters, and which you couldn't convey the plot without.
Christ. I've just admitted watching "Scott Pilgrim vs. The World"!
my girlfriend spent about twenty minutes explaining why this film was massively sexist. i can't remember but the gist of it is something to do with fedoras.
my girlfriend spent about twenty minutes explaining why this film was massively sexist. i can't remember but the gist of it is something to do with fedoras.
Its theme might be libertarian (though you could just as easily say its anarchist), but I fail to see how Firefly could ever be said to have a right-wing theme to it.
Was Heinlein's weird and creepy obsession with incest in some way connected to his right-libertarian politics?
I think its the extreme end of libertarian thinking- not only are gov rules invalid but basic familial and social assumptions are to be disregarded for the brave new man
my girlfriend spent about twenty minutes explaining why this film was massively sexist. i can't remember but the gist of it is something to do with fedoras.
I've given up on Alex Andreou after he tweeted this patronising sexist claptrap then said I should basically shut up about it being sexist because he was only talking about his own mum and he finds it adorable and he loves her
a banal truth, taken completely out of context. Tolkein was a total white academia bod of a bygone age. There was no agency to his talk of 'races' and characteristics attributed to them. Indeed its more to do with the drawing on older myths like the edda and so on that lends him to so. Not innate racism, he's a reactionry but not a bigot
Looks more like ageism than sexism. Old meme, old folks fail at technology.
The issue is not whether Tolkein was a "bigot" on a personal level. It's about the racism in his work. And there's a lot of it. While women essentially don't exist at all, except for the very rare appearance of an ultra-idealised semi-divine being or two. These truths are only "banal" if you regard race and gender as irrelevant beside the really important things in life like making up elvish languages, which is essentially what a lot of fantasy fan special pleading amounts to.
It's interesting though, and telling, that the intersectionalists pick up on the "problematic" politics of race and gender in Tolkein but don't ever mention the reactionary politics of class, which are if anything more up front and which were prominent in earlier left wing critiques going back to Moorcock.
I don't feel safe on this thread anymore.
I don't feel safe on this thread anymore.
name it. I can, I just want to see if you can. Disregarding the easterlings and umbar folks.