It was worse than that - he said "little homeless person" and he was addressing a head of indeterminate sex sticking up out of a heap of blankets etc.
Google images isn't forthcoming but I thought this was good
It was worse than that - he said "little homeless person" and he was addressing a head of indeterminate sex sticking up out of a heap of blankets etc.
Oh gods!Google images isn't forthcoming but I thought this was good <snip>
It's what she represents, what she exemplifies: A thoroughly middle-class take on life that aims to appropriate working-class sentiment and culture for its' own purposes, that "does" activism but always miraculously manages to derive more benefit from bog-standard, even quotidian activism, than anyone who doesn't "do" activism, but rather live it.
The reason people look at the detail of her activity is because of the large potential it holds for exposing hypocrisy and downright fibs. Similar attention to Johann Hari exposed him as a fantasist.
but this equally applies to the vast majority of anarchists, including class struggle anarchists. When you have a room full of posh twat anarchists telling you what it means to be working class while hiding their public school backgrounds you know you have problems.
but why is this important? It is not as though ordinary people don't know journalists are liars:
Ipsos feb 2013 poll:
British public trust not to tell the truth:
politicians (in general) - 77%
bankers - 75%
journalists - 72%
mps in general - 70%
http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchp...an-estate-agents-bankers-and-journalists.aspx
the thing is why is she important enough to expend all this energy on? I'm not really interested in her, in a positive or negative way, she isn't writing for me and i'm not her intended audience, i'm just amazed there is all this interest in detailing her online activity, as if it mattered.
Anarchism to me just looks like a (very privileged) middle class youth subculture. What went wrong?
the thing is why is she important enough to expend all this energy on? I'm not really interested in her, in a positive or negative way, she isn't writing for me and i'm not her intended audience, i'm just amazed there is all this interest in detailing her online activity, as if it mattered.
I don't think anyone will disagree with that but is possible to be posh and not have inherent MC values. Similary it's also possible to be WC and a complete arse. The problem arises when you get a one way version, 'listen to me, I know best, that is why I am on the platform and not you'. A lot of people on this thread aren't hewn from the coal face, myself included, but do have enough experience and interaction with WC that can identify with them. Where as it is obvious the likes of Jones' really doesn't have a clue and merely look up on WC as a specimen, a palette to paint their work with.
I think there's like a builder's black list but for media bubbles and our names are on it.
Indeed. LP is to urban as "King Kev" and other self-styled and self-appointed leaders are to the pagan scene. The threads reduce them back to the size they always were instead of the size they'd like to be.she styles herself as the voice of the left, goes on telly a lot and is quite annoying, it would be unusual if there werent long threads on left/radical leaning political boards about her, that's what the internet's like
I'll be adding a few more suggestions for re-sizing shortly.Indeed. LP is to urban as "King Kev" and other self-styled and self-appointed leaders are to the pagan scene. The threads reduce them back to the size they always were instead of the size they'd like to be.
Much as I'm against capital punishment...I'll be adding a few more suggestions for re-sizing shortly.
but this equally applies to the vast majority of anarchists, including class struggle anarchists. When you have a room full of posh twat anarchists telling you what it means to be working class while hiding their public school backgrounds you know you have problems.
When you hear laurie penny saying stuff on twitter, well frankly it's just another voice in the ether.
but why is this important? It is not as though ordinary people don't know journalists are liars:
Ipsos feb 2013 poll:
British public trust not to tell the truth:
politicians (in general) - 77%
bankers - 75%
journalists - 72%
mps in general - 70%
http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchp...an-estate-agents-bankers-and-journalists.aspx
Not sure that's quite true for Jones. His dad was the militant fulltimer in Sheffield so he'd have been far from well off. I think he has more of a genuine commitment to the politics too. That says more about how shit they are than how good he is though.
“A woman’s free speech is the mini-skirt of the internet”, says British author and blogger Laurie Penny
It's a reasonable analogy, I think. Whereas in the past women were heckled and abused for their attire (the miniskirt) they are now being heckled and abused for voicing their opinions on the internet.
but this equally applies to the vast majority of anarchists, including class struggle anarchists.
It's a reasonable analogy, I think. Whereas in the past women were heckled and abused for their attire (the miniskirt) they are now being heckled and abused for voicing their opinions on the internet.
No worries - I think it lost something when she made it short and punchy. I did think it was good but clumsily expressed.Makes more sense now, Ta!
No worries - I think it lost something when she made it short and punchy. I did think it was good but clumsily expressed.
oh, wait....lucky she's not paid for her writing
I am still in shock that the extra guest on QT gets paid to tweet.
The expenses being the cost of leccy while you have your telly on, or are you supposed to travel to the studio to make you tweets?I'm not sure this is right, Richard Murphy was the guest last week and he said the bbc didn't pay his expenses let alone a fee.
Perhaps he's just a bad negotiator, I was surprised he didn't get expenses.