I have no idea what this thread is about but what is wrong with the article in your link?
What's right with it?
I have no idea what this thread is about but what is wrong with the article in your link?
I have no idea what this thread is about but what is wrong with the article in your link?
As mentioned above, she embellished a tale of her 'burlesque' experience, was caught out by other members of the troupe and the article was seriously (and embarrassingly/damaging to credibility IMO) amended a month later and was still being edited a full 5 months later.
Its just an article about trying to live on JSA. I'm asking you, whats wrong with it?What's right with it?
Oh ok, I'm just looking at it as any newspaper article. Its normal enough for well paid journos to write about the plight of the poverty stricken.i presume they mean the complaints about her temporary poverty. Or indeed the constant reference to how hard unemployed young graduates have it.
On the other hand, considering the audience, it's a good way of making the point that unemployment benefit is (a) very little money and (b) claimed by people just like them.
Of course, the old left is not about to disappear completely. It is highly likely that even after a nuclear attack, the only remaining life-forms will be cockroaches and sour-faced vendors of the Socialist Worker. Stunningly, the paper is still being peddled at every demonstration to young cyber-activists for whom the very concept of a newspaper is almost as outdated as the notion of ideological unity as a basis for action.
As mentioned above, she embellished a tale of her 'burlesque' experience, was caught out by other members of the troupe and the article was seriously (and embarrassingly/damaging to credibility IMO) amended a month later and was still being edited a full 5 months later.
Just noticed that now Labour, then Lammy and then Clegg have all fallen by the wayside it's now counter-fire and their extensive media contacts book that's the future - book with Clare Solomon and Tariq frigging ali (another lib-dem believer) on the way. Lot of people getting a bit fed up of her self-appointed role as voice of 'the youth'...
As mentioned above, she embellished a tale of her 'burlesque' experience, was caught out by other members of the troupe and the article was seriously (and embarrassingly/damaging to credibility IMO) amended a month later and was still being edited a full 5 months later.
Just noticed that now Labour, then Lammy and then Clegg have all fallen by the wayside it's now counter-fire and their extensive media contacts book that's the future - book with Clare Solomon and Tariq frigging ali (another lib-dem believer) on the way. Lot of people getting a bit fed up of her self-appointed role as voice of 'the youth'...
I know that is the situation for a lot of people, but for young graduates, middle-class people, it is a real shock. It is not sufficiently recognised at all – how poor the rates are in the benefit system."
Regarding Penny, my take is that she's primarily a blogger, writer and tweeter - and that if people didn't like what she was saying, they'd stop following her. Part of me would like to give her the benefit of the doubt of learning her trade/making mistakes. At least the untruths she wrote were printed in a newspaper - because when it comes to printing untruths our press has got form! I think it also goes to show that people are much more hot on these things and are able to respond to them instantly and publicly - which gives things much more publicity than in the "errors and corrections" column.
butchersapron, if you can stand this, have a listen to Rees towards the end of this this video. The gall of this man is unfuckingbelievable.
The sound quality is so bad i can barely make out what he's saying - could make out that what he thinks is needed is 'ruthless humility'
Also, please please check out the ginger kid at 29.45 with his plan for revolution - it's genius absurd. Oddly enough, the local SWP organiser here thinks in the same way, expect he thinks the general strike will come through the TUC.
I didn't mishear - he said this is how a general strike happens. 1) students occupy universities. 2) workers go the factories and are radicalised by the students 3) they go back and occupy factories 4) general strike happens. It's historically wrong, ridiculously formal and based on a mad reading of the production and transmission of 'consciousness'.
.....then went back to the factories and struck and occupiied..[couldn't make out this bit] ? schematic and that's basically what happened. Students occupied. Workers go to [students] occupation. The occupation, student movement radicalises a section of workers. This turns into a general strike. It is not the case that students came out of their occupation went to the workers and somehow this turned into a general strike. The mechanism that an awful lot of the left thinks should be in place they've got entirely the wrong way round. Their reading history the wrong way round and that is the problem that we are seeing at the moment. I think it's a challenge for what we are doing.
No 2 you've written "factories" when I think you you meant to write 'universities and colleges'?
Anyway, this I picked up from his contribution. Couldn't hear the first bit, however he continues:
Goes on a bit more about others getting it wrong and we are the ones who know what needs doing blah, blah, blah - recruitment speech.
You're right, he's arguing primarily that workers be taken to the student movement, become radicalised and then a general strike.
There's nothing wrong in the first bit. Important that unity be built between students and workers. Inviting workers to colleges and universities is nothing new, but and I agree with you here too, he then proceeds in a mechanical, formalistic way.
Maybe if you elaborate what happened in France in '68 to make some comparison?
Oh god, no.
We rounded on him in desperation. None of us had any money, but we were all freezing, and we needed paper - not to read, but to burn. We begged him to give us even one paper, and join us at the fire. A slew of emotions chased across the SWP seller's face as he considered this dilemma. Finally, he agreed to give us two copies, if, and only if, any of us could sing at least two verses of the Internationale. So we did - me, some NEETs and schoolkids from the slums of London - our voices shaking a little from the chill. He handed over the papers with a smile and shuffled into the circle to warm up.