Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
fela fan said:
How is it that a tornado can impale a single stalk of hay into a tree trunk?
Al Qaeda a myth says Russian
- Thread starter Raisin D'etre
- Start date
How is it that a tornado can impale a single stalk of hay into a tree trunk?
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
fela fan said:
But your answer to my question, is the same as my, and possibly the editor's answer to yours.
"Not a fucking clue"
But my dearth of knowledge doesn't mean that it didn't happen.
JC2 is useless. Ignore.
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
Raisin D'etre said:
Good answer for someone who actually doesn't have a real answer.
Helllo. This includes my people.
Johnny Canuck3
Well-Known Member
Raisin D'etre said:
Are they all inside the one head?
editor said:
So, unable to counter the photographic evidence that so eloquently contradicts the NIST computer simulation, you resort instead to your trusty tactic of doing a rubbishing job on the site from where the images were taken.
Well, if you don't like that site then here's another one I googled at random containing similar images of the aviation fuel fireball OUTSIDE tower 2. Its a good one this, because you can also see that the impact location is nowhere near the centre of the building as the NIST simulation puts it. See what you think. If you're not happy give us a shout and I'll google another one up randomly for you.
editor said:
Good lord man. Getting somewhere??? This has been my line from day one. Don't tell me you've only just discovered this? I'm sorry, but i have great difficulty in believing a missile or any other such stuff you drone on about hit those two towers. Obviously two planes did.
editor said:
Are you suggesting that people have survived fireballs like that? Surely not...?
And a document surviving it!!!! And one that just happens to be one of the hijacker's, not the crew or passengers.
You just couldn't make this kind of conspiracy up.
Whoops, wait a minute, isn't that the version the USG gave us?
slaar said:
Maybe this sequence of shots can help you slaar.
http://www.solcomhouse.com/635083.gif
(editor: enourmous image removed)
Notice how the aircraft banks to port before slamming into the building and then the huge fireball?
Ooh, look, its the howling hoard answering the call yelping for the thread to get binned. Isn't marvelous!
Tell me Loki, do you watch endless reruns of Songs of Praise on a Sunday evening on your video and then write to the BBC demanding they bin the show?
No! Well you should. It's the sought of activity a guy like you will get a kick out of.
PS Tell em' to bin their 6 and 10 o'clock nightly "news" sermons while your at it will you... they're really crap. Oh and Newsnight too, I'm completely sick of listening of Jeremy Spudwank and his Oxbridge toad chums telling humungous porkies about the war in Iraq. Thanks.
Tell me Loki, do you watch endless reruns of Songs of Praise on a Sunday evening on your video and then write to the BBC demanding they bin the show?
No! Well you should. It's the sought of activity a guy like you will get a kick out of.
PS Tell em' to bin their 6 and 10 o'clock nightly "news" sermons while your at it will you... they're really crap. Oh and Newsnight too, I'm completely sick of listening of Jeremy Spudwank and his Oxbridge toad chums telling humungous porkies about the war in Iraq. Thanks.
er, was that meant to be wit?bigfish said:
You know full well the bin is chockful of CTers like yourself spouting the same pet theories over and over and over and over again. The reason they're in the bin is to remind people like you that it's been discussed to death already, hundreds of times over.
Can't you get the message?
bigfish said:
Seeing as I'm an atheist and find pretty much every christian ceremony boring as fuck, no I don't watch them. But neither do I witter to the BBC because some people like that sort of stuff. Urban75 isn't the BBC though.
The difference here is it's a handful of conspiraloons like yourself who take every opportunity to raise the same fucking issues even though they've been discussed to death and your daft theories proved wrong, time and time and time again.
Why don't you find a dedicated CT forum so you CTers can all agree with eachother and leave the rest of us alone?
Loki said:
Hang on a minute! Aren't you one of those believers who thinks that 19 Arab blokes turned over a fucking super-power with box-cutters?
It looks to me as though you're suffering from conspiraloneritus in its most accute and advanced form, dull repetition and your attempts at projecting your "illness" on to those who refuse to accept idiotic theories like the one above are the symptoms to watch out for.
invisibleplanet
porter des cornes
Loki said:
although there's alot of well-researched non-CT background here re. Bin Laden's organisation, the afghani pipeline 'fight' between an argentinian and US oil company, and a few other relevant but non-CT facts re. 'Al Qaeda', i agree that the thread has taken a nose-dive.
Lovely bin, btw Loki.
Loki said:
You yourself loki said you'd not read this thread. If you had've done you'd realise that there have been many and varied posters on it, a huge range in fact. There have been plenty of side discussions going on, and many comments about what a good thread it's been. Perhaps in the last couple of pages or so it's gone down a more predictable route, but hey, that's life innit?
Your sudden arrival to call for the bin is actually quite offensive. Well, it's not to me, but it isn't very pleasant to see you popping up with your exceedingly well-worn tune when so many different posters have contributed so much to a good fun thread.
Hey man, guess what, lots of posters've been having FUN on this thread, no doubt that includes editor. You're the only one of the usual crew who've popped along to scream 'BIN'.
Why on earth do you do it? Fun-wrecker!
invisibleplanet
porter des cornes
"But it's still been a rare beacon of light in an increasingly dim world..."
no, i disagree entirely.
i've stayed away from this thread since it went back to the 'manhattan massacre' to go over the same old same old impact issues, at the expense of discussing current AQ/Saudi Terrorism issues.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,1453073,00.html
no, i disagree entirely.
i've stayed away from this thread since it went back to the 'manhattan massacre' to go over the same old same old impact issues, at the expense of discussing current AQ/Saudi Terrorism issues.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,12469,1453073,00.html
Although I largely agree with your questioning of the angle of attack, I'm going to have to pull you up on this - the NIST animation doesn't simulate anything about the fuel. Fuel distribution was not a parameter in the simulation - the debris you see moving out the other side of the building is metal from the plane.bigfish said:
Similar threads
- Locked