sleaterkinney
Well-Known Member
The odds are designed so that overall the bookie does not lose money. I worked in William hill shops for years and we were never ever down.
You keep saying “nothing to do with probability”. How do you think bookies set the market for something like a white Christmas then? Can you see any link at all between where the money goes and actual events that take place?
Sure odds aren’t themselves probabilities, but to claim there’s invariably no correlation between odds and probabilities is just weird.
I think you’re arguing against something I never claimed, tilting at windmills, and not exactly politely as you claimed.
You understand percentages though, so I suppose that’s me told.
Jesus Christ. Do you know what an S.P is? Do you know what a tote pool is and how it works?
This race is the very essence of what I am talking about. The 80-1 S.P of the winning horse was actually about 81.5-1. This is because a pool of money was bet and divided up, as I've said, to give odds that reflect that pool and leave a profit margin for the tote. Private bookmakers are banned in Kentucky, so this is the only way S.Ps are decided.
The S.P has nothing to do with probability. Everything to do with that pool of money.
If I bet on a 100-1 shot, lots and lots, reducing that price down to say 10-1, does that mean the probability of my horse winning has increased by 10x, or does it mean those taking the bets are protecting their profit margins by reducing the price?
I'll give you a clue. It's b).
HTH.