Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

2014 EU/Local Election Thread - Predictions and Results

Worth saying again, in effect UKIP hit nearer to 30%...with AIFE 'stealing' 2% in the regions where they put up against Farage.
 
Worth saying again, in effect UKIP hit nearer to 30%...with AIFE 'stealing' 2% in the regions where they put up against Farage.
Was just about to say this - and i've seen noted number crunchers say the AIFE vote cost them the two seats that the greens won. They've not posted figures yet, but i expect we'll be hearing a lot more about this shortly.
 
Re AIFE, it's reasonable for there to be a centrist Eurosceptic party as well as a hard right one. It's not passing off, and it's perfectly plausible for a good proportion of their votes to have been considered and deliberate.
 
upload_2014-5-26_10-51-19-png.54551
that is what my mental map of Britain looks like too...the zone extending up to scotland
 
Wretched BBC commentary constantly saying that Labour "only just" beat the Conservatives, despite the Scottish votes not having been added in yet.
 
Wretched BBC commentary constantly saying that Labour "only just" beat the Conservatives, despite the Scottish votes not having been added in yet.

Also annoying that R4 were reporting earlier that Labour beat the Tories in Scotland with no mention at all of the SNP who beat both of them to come top. Really lazy/ignorant reporting. (Western Isles still to be counted but given the number of people there ie not very many won't make any different to the result.)
 
Quite; engineered ballot paper position bias....one of the oldest tricks in the book.:rolleyes:
1/4 million votes for an unknown party with a name very similar to the one it's spoiling and that made sure it's name was first on the list and whose leaflets were as close to UKIP ones as legally possible. Yeah, maybe just maybe.
 
Last edited:
Appropriating, if you wish...but it's pretty obvious that the votes were nicked...whatever you may choose to think.


No, they were given away by inattentive voters who couldn't be bothered to read the ballot paper properly
 
Aren't there rules nowadays about masquerading as another party? Brought in after someone got tens of thousands of votes standing as a Literal Democrat iirc.
 
Aren't there rules nowadays about masquerading as another party? Brought in after someone got tens of thousands of votes standing as a Literal Democrat iirc.

Yes however AIFE managed to avoid breaking the rules which are quite deliberately worded.

To be fair as well Mike Nattrass who was sacked from UKIP fully admitted that they were trying to wreck the UKIP vote.
 
Aren't there rules nowadays about masquerading as another party? Brought in after someone got tens of thousands of votes standing as a Literal Democrat iirc.
Yep, they have to pass a test to get on the register - this lot passed despite their clear intentions. Funny that.
 
1/4 million votes for an unknown party with a name very similar to the one it's spoiling and that made sure it's name was first on the list and whose leaflets were as close to UKIP ones as legally possible. Yeah, maybe just maybe.

In the West Midlands, 'We Demand a Referendum' got 23k votes compared to 27k for AIFE. This does suggest that there are a reasonable chunk of voters who are prepared to vote for previously unknown UKIP spinoffs. Although 'We Demand a Referendum' only stood in the West Midlands and seemed to be selling themselves on the performance of ex-UKIP MEP Nikki Sinclaire.
 
Actually they're in the European Free Alliance which brings together progressive and centrist seperatist parties - and which sits with the Greens to form the Greens-EFA for the purposes of Europarl party groups rules.

I do like the idea of an alliance of separatists.
 
Back
Top Bottom