That’d be everyone on IB. Therefore, you are categorically stating that every single disabled person on IB is capable of working. You are not making any provision for those people who consultants have warned that working could kill them; or, that working could make their conditions irreversibly worse. Yours is a black and white solution; if you breathe and claim IB, you’re fit for work.
You’re an advocate of the run before you can walk school of thinking, aren’t you. If you were a town planner you’d build the houses first; then worry about roads, links to utilities, shops, schools, GPs surgeries, libraries, public transport etc – if indeed, you even felt a need for such tiresome infrastructural excess or basic amenities.
But then, this is how government has operated in this country for decades – why change winning ways. Telling us they’re serious about lifting disabled people from poverty and social exclusion is different to putting in place the means and infrastructure to carry out such a gargantuan task. Are they opening more job centres; employing more DEAs; putting more money into Access to Work; making it more difficult for employers to discriminate against disabled job seekers; encouraging organisations such as Remploy to open more factories.
No, they’re doing none of these things. They’re closing job centres; they’re moving staff from redundant job centres to existing ones – hardly an environment for employing more DEAs; they’re excluding whole government departments from AtoW – with the view to withdrawing it from the whole of the public sector (this can only mean the private sector will follow); they’ve not toughened the DDA in any meaningful way to deter employers from discriminating against disabled people – especially at the recruitment stage; they’ve rubberstamped the closure of 30 Remploy factories, adding another 2,500 to the 2.3 million they want back to work; and, they’re going to phase out all local authority supported employment schemes.
All this as we enter a recession. Are these the actions of a government serious about helping disabled people?