I'd have thought that any party would aspire to have an accurate and up to date data base of its membership for obvious reasons. As regards access, my LP friends tell me that at a local level the data has always been notoriously leaky with loads of folk having access for 'campaigning'.Let's be honest, they are probably all at it. What I don't get is why this database exists and is so easy to access, wtf is that about
I'd have thought that any party would aspire to have an accurate and up to date data base of its membership for obvious reasons. As regards access, my LP friends tell me that at a local level the data has always been notoriously leaky with loads of folk having access for 'campaigning'.
What I don't get is why the LP is asking its own Leadership/deputy candidates to pay £5k for the privilege of being able to contact the party's members.
Worked for Pete TownsendThe ‘I was only doing research’ excuse is rarely the best look.
Apols...you know more than I do.Yeah any org is going to have a database of members (labour has an open directory of members which any member can access, like an internal basic facebook thing), but the data Starmer has been accused of accessing is from Dialogue which is a much wider data set (not just of members I don't think) gleaned from phone canvassing etc. Dunno what this includes (eg does it record who people voted for, which way they voted in ref, trade union membership etc) but still seems remiss to allow open access when actually accessing this data for leadership campaigns is apparently a data breach worthy of ICO investigation
Apols...you know more than I do.
I just assumed it was members & affiliates but, yeah if it's actual punters' data, that sounds more dodge.I dunno, I could be wrong but that's my understanding. Seems a shitty way to manage data anyway
He linked to something on globalresearch last week.The Rod Liddle of the 2030s.
But not Josef Mengele. People are fickle.Worked for Pete Townsend
lol either that or you are just in a tiny minority within the labour party. The gender hypocritical lot lost every debate, including in the womens sections, so dont try to pretend you were silenced. You just lost, very badly.Ha. Brilliant watching this collection of tin-eared idiots fucking up royally on the trans issue (see Expelme on twitter). The calculation that leads them to supinely signing up to the list of trans-cult demands is (I presume) that they assume that the Labour Party membership is hugely "woke" and also signed up to this nonsense. It's classic bubble stuff though; most of the gender critical membership have kept their heads down because they can't face the shitstorm that erupts if you dare to say anything inside Labour, but the leadership issue is going to blow it into the open.
Labour really are fucked if they think they can take this to the doorsteps and there are thousands of members who know this. Madness, right up with the stupidest of the ultra left trot micro-cults.
lol either that or you are just in a tiny minority within the labour party. The gender hypocritical lot lost every debate, including in the womens sections, so dont try to pretend you were silenced. You just lost, very badly.
thats what Patricia Hewitt said when arguing against Labour supporting gay rights back in the eighties. Thankfully, she was completely and utterly wrong.Ah you may well be right, I've had nothing to do with the internal debate, I found it impossible to summon up the enthusiasm for debating with the lunacy but it's certainly helped me give up my short-lived Labour Party membership. But it seems objectively fecking weird that all these wannabe PMs are signing their own political death warrants so eagerly. Hey ho.
thats what Patricia Hewitt said when arguing against Labour supporting gay rights back in the eighties. Thankfully, she was completely and utterly wrong.
There is no general support for trans self-Id either in the population at large, nor in the Labour Party. Nor is there general antagonism. There has been no debate, no discussion and little attempt at either. That is the problem. Attempts at discussion are shut down and there is an all-too-ready resort to slogans and smears at the first opportunity.A substantial majority of the general population support trans self-ID, and I can only assume this would be a much bigger majority within the Labour Party. The gender critical membership aren't keeping their heads down - there just isn't very many of them.
Leaps onto thread to declaim on a subject where they then admit they have no background knowledge to call everyone with a different perspective to them a cultist and/or opportunist.
Seriously co-op, take a look at your own behaviour here. If this was someone else doing the same thing on a different topic you'd be well in telling them they were behaving like an obsessive loon.
There's no real public debate or discussion on most issues, yet people still have an opinion - as they do here. The polling I've seen is pretty clear - there's zero mileage in any Labour leadership candidate coming out against trans rights in 2020.There is no general support for trans self-Id either in the population at large, nor in the Labour Party. Nor is there general antagonism. There has been no debate, no discussion and little attempt at either. That is the problem. Attempts at discussion are shut down and there is an all-too-ready resort to slogans and smears at the first opportunity.
it's because - outside of some very small circles - it didn't blow up.here's a great massive thread on the Labour leadership contest, here's the biggest issue to blow up in that contest in the last 2 days and no one says a thing here?
that's just not true with the LP. The debate has been had over several years and has, overwhelmingly, been conducted convivially and without rancour. The idea that any discussion is immediately 'shut down' is just a fib propounded by those who lost.There is no general support for trans self-Id either in the population at large, nor in the Labour Party. Nor is there general antagonism. There has been no debate, no discussion and little attempt at either. That is the problem. Attempts at discussion are shut down and there is an all-too-ready resort to slogans and smears at the first opportunity.
it's certainly helped me give up my short-lived Labour Party membership
I couldn't dispute any claims about what had happened about recent debates within the LP because I haven't taken part
here's the biggest issue to blow up in that contest in the last 2 days
They can want it all they like; nothing they can do about it going now.Newsnight debate last night, all candidates want to see some form of FOM post Brexit. They just lost a large amount of seats largely due to that policy