Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who will be the next Labour leader?

Who will replace Corbyn?


  • Total voters
    161
Let's be honest, they are probably all at it. What I don't get is why this database exists and is so easy to access, wtf is that about
I'd have thought that any party would aspire to have an accurate and up to date data base of its membership for obvious reasons. As regards access, my LP friends tell me that at a local level the data has always been notoriously leaky with loads of folk having access for 'campaigning'.
What I don't get is why the LP is asking its own Leadership/deputy candidates to pay £5k for the privilege of being able to contact the party's members.
 
I'd have thought that any party would aspire to have an accurate and up to date data base of its membership for obvious reasons. As regards access, my LP friends tell me that at a local level the data has always been notoriously leaky with loads of folk having access for 'campaigning'.
What I don't get is why the LP is asking its own Leadership/deputy candidates to pay £5k for the privilege of being able to contact the party's members.

Yeah any org is going to have a database of members (labour has an open directory of members which any member can access, like an internal basic facebook thing), but the data Starmer has been accused of accessing is from Dialogue which is a much wider data set (not just of members I don't think) gleaned from phone canvassing etc. Dunno what this includes (eg does it record who people voted for, which way they voted in ref, trade union membership etc) but still seems remiss to allow open access when actually accessing this data for leadership campaigns is apparently a data breach worthy of ICO investigation
 
Yeah any org is going to have a database of members (labour has an open directory of members which any member can access, like an internal basic facebook thing), but the data Starmer has been accused of accessing is from Dialogue which is a much wider data set (not just of members I don't think) gleaned from phone canvassing etc. Dunno what this includes (eg does it record who people voted for, which way they voted in ref, trade union membership etc) but still seems remiss to allow open access when actually accessing this data for leadership campaigns is apparently a data breach worthy of ICO investigation
Apols...you know more than I do.
 
Whatever happened to whichever one out of ChUK was caught with their hand in Labour's data jar after leaving the party? Was it nothing? I bet it was nothing.
 
Starmer’s most moderate pitch to the left sets off a reaction from the usual suspects.

 
So, I think this is the first TV debate:



I have to say that I am hoping RLB or one of Nandy or Starmer says something interesting tonight. I'm aware that in a leadership election nobody wants to overreach and be the candidate with the ideas and therefore the one to be shot at by the others. But, when Corbyn won you could feel that he was setting the narrative and shifting the debate. This feels stifling and dull.
 
Ha. Brilliant watching this collection of tin-eared idiots fucking up royally on the trans issue (see Expelme on twitter). The calculation that leads them to supinely signing up to the list of trans-cult demands is (I presume) that they assume that the Labour Party membership is hugely "woke" and also signed up to this nonsense. It's classic bubble stuff though; most of the gender critical membership have kept their heads down because they can't face the shitstorm that erupts if you dare to say anything inside Labour, but the leadership issue is going to blow it into the open.

Labour really are fucked if they think they can take this to the doorsteps and there are thousands of members who know this. Madness, right up with the stupidest of the ultra left trot micro-cults.
 
Ha. Brilliant watching this collection of tin-eared idiots fucking up royally on the trans issue (see Expelme on twitter). The calculation that leads them to supinely signing up to the list of trans-cult demands is (I presume) that they assume that the Labour Party membership is hugely "woke" and also signed up to this nonsense. It's classic bubble stuff though; most of the gender critical membership have kept their heads down because they can't face the shitstorm that erupts if you dare to say anything inside Labour, but the leadership issue is going to blow it into the open.

Labour really are fucked if they think they can take this to the doorsteps and there are thousands of members who know this. Madness, right up with the stupidest of the ultra left trot micro-cults.
lol either that or you are just in a tiny minority within the labour party. The gender hypocritical lot lost every debate, including in the womens sections, so dont try to pretend you were silenced. You just lost, very badly.
 
A substantial majority of the general population support trans self-ID, and I can only assume this would be a much bigger majority within the Labour Party. The gender critical membership aren't keeping their heads down - there just isn't very many of them.
 
lol either that or you are just in a tiny minority within the labour party. The gender hypocritical lot lost every debate, including in the womens sections, so dont try to pretend you were silenced. You just lost, very badly.

Ah you may well be right, I've had nothing to do with the internal debate, I found it impossible to summon up the enthusiasm for debating with the lunacy but it's certainly helped me give up my short-lived Labour Party membership. But it seems objectively fecking weird that all these wannabe PMs are signing their own political death warrants so eagerly. Hey ho.
 
Ah you may well be right, I've had nothing to do with the internal debate, I found it impossible to summon up the enthusiasm for debating with the lunacy but it's certainly helped me give up my short-lived Labour Party membership. But it seems objectively fecking weird that all these wannabe PMs are signing their own political death warrants so eagerly. Hey ho.
thats what Patricia Hewitt said when arguing against Labour supporting gay rights back in the eighties. Thankfully, she was completely and utterly wrong.
 
Leaps onto thread to declaim on a subject where they then admit they have no background knowledge to call everyone with a different perspective to them a cultist and/or opportunist.

Seriously co-op, take a look at your own behaviour here. If this was someone else doing the same thing on a different topic you'd be well in telling them they were behaving like an obsessive loon.
 
thats what Patricia Hewitt said when arguing against Labour supporting gay rights back in the eighties. Thankfully, she was completely and utterly wrong.

I remember; I was one of the people campaigning for those rights. Self ID is no comparison of course but obviously that's not something you'd accept. But good luck with it all anyway.
 
A substantial majority of the general population support trans self-ID, and I can only assume this would be a much bigger majority within the Labour Party. The gender critical membership aren't keeping their heads down - there just isn't very many of them.
There is no general support for trans self-Id either in the population at large, nor in the Labour Party. Nor is there general antagonism. There has been no debate, no discussion and little attempt at either. That is the problem. Attempts at discussion are shut down and there is an all-too-ready resort to slogans and smears at the first opportunity.
 
Leaps onto thread to declaim on a subject where they then admit they have no background knowledge to call everyone with a different perspective to them a cultist and/or opportunist.

Seriously co-op, take a look at your own behaviour here. If this was someone else doing the same thing on a different topic you'd be well in telling them they were behaving like an obsessive loon.

I have a fuckton of "background knowledge" acquired over decades of experience in this field. But for sure I couldn't dispute any claims about what had happened about recent debates within the LP because I haven't taken part in them because I can't face the shit, like thousands of others. But now that it's up and in the open my guess is that it will be a real own goal for all the candidates and for Labour, based on the fact that open house self-ID is basically unsellable when people realise the logical consequences of it.

I guess I am being mischievous though; here's a great massive thread on the Labour leadership contest, here's the biggest issue to blow up in that contest in the last 2 days and no one says a thing here? It's fucking fascinating me, I must admit. Don't think your taboos will play in the wider world, seriously, they don't.
 
There is no general support for trans self-Id either in the population at large, nor in the Labour Party. Nor is there general antagonism. There has been no debate, no discussion and little attempt at either. That is the problem. Attempts at discussion are shut down and there is an all-too-ready resort to slogans and smears at the first opportunity.
There's no real public debate or discussion on most issues, yet people still have an opinion - as they do here. The polling I've seen is pretty clear - there's zero mileage in any Labour leadership candidate coming out against trans rights in 2020.
 
There is no general support for trans self-Id either in the population at large, nor in the Labour Party. Nor is there general antagonism. There has been no debate, no discussion and little attempt at either. That is the problem. Attempts at discussion are shut down and there is an all-too-ready resort to slogans and smears at the first opportunity.
that's just not true with the LP. The debate has been had over several years and has, overwhelmingly, been conducted convivially and without rancour. The idea that any discussion is immediately 'shut down' is just a fib propounded by those who lost.
 
it's certainly helped me give up my short-lived Labour Party membership

I couldn't dispute any claims about what had happened about recent debates within the LP because I haven't taken part

If you're not a member and not involved in the debates you can't claim a "fuckton" of background knowledge, can you.

here's the biggest issue to blow up in that contest in the last 2 days

For you, because ironically you're the one working on bubble logic here. Which is why the way things keep turning out are counter to what you think should make sense. Most people don't give a fuck about trans issues one way or the other and the majority of those who do, in progressive circles, aren't "silenced" or "scared" or part of a cult — they just don't agree with you.
 
Newsnight debate last night, all candidates want to see some form of FOM post Brexit. They just lost a large amount of seats largely due to that policy
 
Back
Top Bottom