Larry O'Hara
Well-Known Member
Half-way Blairite? A turd is still a turd...and anyway as I have stated earlier on this thread I dont buy the idea that Starmer is even competent.I'm even more depressed about it than that, because I don't think Starmer's completely shit (note emphasis!)
I think he could well contrive a half-way competent job at moving the LP towards somewhere half-way efficient, half-way competent**, with a half-reasonable set of soft-left policies, which are half-way but not completely Blairite, and as such winning a half-decent number of seats -- and those mostly but not completely in the wrong areas
**And there's a lot to be said for that in pure operational and Seamus Milne-free terms
Compared to that, Nandy's drawbacks look a fair bit more acceptable IMO ...
you have got to distinguish between
a) tactics to win an election, at which the Tories were superb and Labour crap. Something I will elaborate on elsewhere.
b) policies to resolve serious issues. On this the Tories kicked both HS2 and Huawei into the medium-length grass. Today shows another example: nationalising Northern Rail, delayed till now to avoid giving Labour policy credence. Here, the innovative ideas fostered by McDonnell on public ownership and even the Green New Deal with its limitations are genuinely interesting. Electing scum like Starmer will end all that.
in which case I’m with RLB, whatever her limitations. Nandy, as has been pointed out, is resolutely anti-Leftist.