Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Who will be the next Labour leader?

Who will replace Corbyn?


  • Total voters
    161
It wasn’t even true back in 1997. I remember that election so well. Everybody really fucking hated the Tory party. They were the “nasty party”. Labour could have been anything at all and still won that election, and at least the next. Cameron’s success was to realise he needed to embrace social liberalism to free them of the taint of Lilley and Howard and Tebbitt and Portillo etc
 
It is an irrelevant and obsolete myth that Labour can only win elections as a liberal centrist party. It's at least 7 years past its sell-by date, i.e. when the electorate started emphatically rejecting everything centrist

Simply not true. There have been no labour governments for 45 years apart from blair.
 
Nandys’ ‘ f*ck the Scots, they’re as bad as the Catalonians, the Nat. bstards’ intervention this week was good vfm, must say
Bit of an own goal that was and not a way to win over the Scottish voters who Labour desperately need to get back into government.
 
It is an irrelevant and obsolete myth that Labour can only win elections as a liberal centrist party. It's at least 7 years past its sell-by date, i.e. when the electorate started emphatically rejecting everything centrist
Sorry but Blair won three elections, two by landslides on exactly that platform. He's the only Labour prime minister to have tasted success in 40 years. What does that tell you?
 
1997 was the first election I was old enough to vote in. I duly went out and voted Labour, stayed up late and celebrated and everything. It did feel like a new era, to me anyway.

After that I didn't vote Labour again until 2017. I've no interest in going back there.
 
That people desperately, viscerally hated the Tory party at the time.

How old were you in 1997, Lefty1992?
Agreed there was a hatred towards the Tories and that they were on their way out but Blair modernised Labour and gave them a vision which made them electable again. If they'd been a hard left party held to ransom by the unions like they were during the Thatcher years, they would have lost. Kinnock started the modernisation by taking on the unions and came close in 1992 and Blair finished the job off.
 
Then you have literally no idea what you’re talking about. Even people in very right-wing areas — and I was living in one of them — were desperate to get rid of the Major government. His party were massively socially conservative — anti-gay, anti-women, anti-minority, anti-everything and everyone except white heterosexual men. It went heavily against the social liberalisation of the nineties and people literally hated the Tory MPs, even if they agreed with right wing economics. Anybody would have beaten them.
 
Then you have literally no idea what you’re talking about. Even people in very right-wing areas — and I was living in one of them — were desperate to get rid of the Major government. His party were massively socially conservative — anti-gay, anti-women, anti-minority, anti-everything and everyone except white heterosexual men. It went heavily against the social liberalisation of the nineties and people literally hated the Tory MPs, even if they agreed with right wing economics. Anybody would have beaten them.

Rather like anyone would beat Labour right now. They're just as wrapped up in their own views and completely out of touch as the Tories were until Cameron arrived. The last election showed this. Labour need to go through the same process as the Tories by accepting some hard truths, facing up to why they went wrong and their failures, and finding someone with the vision to make the party electable again. Or you can retreat to the comfort of a few hundred thousand members agreeing with you?
 
anyone who repeats tory talking points like 'held to ransom by the unions' isn't left wing, yeah.
Well yeah with the Winter of Discontent in 1978-79, strikes galore and blackouts.
And my point is that the hard left type seem totally unaccepting of other view points. They don't seem to acknowledge that Labour is supposed to be a broad church and the main opposition party with a goal of trying to get into government, not some protest movement. I'm centre left and want to see a Labour party that can make a difference get back in government, hence why I call myself Lefty.
 
I hate it when people discuss 1997 as it just brings back to me how shite the mid to late 90s were, I mean in every way not just politically, it was embarrassing. Oasis and lager and men behaving badly, loaded and massive jeans, reebok classics, union jack cushions, awful time.

Oasis v Blur.... the new class signifiers
 
Well yeah with the Winter of Discontent in 1978-79, strikes galore and blackouts.
And my point is that the hard left type seem totally unaccepting of other view points. They don't seem to acknowledge that Labour is supposed to be a broad church and the main opposition party with a goal of trying to get into government, not some protest movement. I'm centre left and want to see a Labour party that can make a difference get back in government, hence why I call myself Lefty.
There werent any blackouts in 1978/9 son. Blackouts were imposed by the Tories during the miners industrial action in 1974 . The Tories called an election camapigning on the slogan 'Who Governs Britain' and Labour won the election and settled the dispute giving the miners a 35% pay rise., a year later the NUM won a further rise.
 
And enjoyable rinse of Jess Philips right here: Lynsey Hanley | Performing an Idea of Ordinariness · LRB 22 January 2020

"Everywoman: One Woman’s Truth about Speaking the Truth, which came out in 2017, is an everyday tale of one middle-class city-dweller’s struggle to reach Westminster from a professional public-sector background, having gone to a highly selective grammar school and two Russell Group universities."
 
Back
Top Bottom