belboid
Exasperated, not angry.
which is, A, nothing to do with that article and, B, simply a recapitulation of existing labour policy.Er, she just spoke, in limited detail' admittedly, aboout developing an industrial strategy, etc.
which is, A, nothing to do with that article and, B, simply a recapitulation of existing labour policy.Er, she just spoke, in limited detail' admittedly, aboout developing an industrial strategy, etc.
and she's gone
Labour leadership: Jess Phillips quits race to succeed Jeremy Corbyn
The Birmingham Yardley MP bows out of the contest as Lisa Nandy gets the backing of the GMB union.www.bbc.co.uk
Cursed tweet
Also
Not entirely sure what they're going for here, but I'm sure someone had fun making the images
Whilst I agree with your opinion that they are an unimpressive selection, someone has to win.Excellent news about the plazzy working class Brummie dropping out. We just need Thornberry, Nandy, Starmer and Long-Bailey to do the same now....
Whilst I agree with your opinion that they are an unimpressive selection, someone has to win.
At least it wasn't Harry Potter I guess.
Just hear Lisa Nandy interviewed on Radio 4.
She said she supported Corbyn movinn the consensus away from the Blair years ( away from neolibealism I assume). That Blair had done good things like bring in mimimum wage.
She didnt say Universal Credit should be scrapped. But that it had been rolled out wthout enough support for people.
She said the welfare state ( in Labour party terms) was to paternalistic. That a discusssion is needed about restructuring it.Going back to its original principles. Helping peoples aspirations.
She thought the manifesto had to much in it and it "frightened people".
When she said that UC was rolled out without support she said it ws no good bringing in this UC when local services like libraries are being closed.
Im a bit concrned about her comments on "aspiration". If that means putting funding into local services like libraries etc then it might mean something. But it cmes across a bit like the Blair years.
Her point about the paternalism of labour's approach to welfare state is bang on tbf
To change welfare everything else needs to change too, especially housing. Welfare should be high benefits with intensive training to help people maintain their lives and move on. Now it’s a resentful hand out to people the state has little aspiration for. The phenomenal cost of housing and poor wages are massive disincentives to people who may be struggling for lots of personal reasons. So it’s good she mentions it, but what’s the aspiration and what’s the alternative to paternalism she wants to offer?
strengthening unions? what else you thinking of?it should be about giving working class people the tools to take positive action, the stuff that is already available and taken for granted by others
Yeah can't argue with that and as chilango says there is a massive difference between an emphasis on collective aspiration, working class aspiration, and individualised social mobility. In terms of meat and bones of what a potential labour govt could do, I dunno, it's never never land anyway, but I did find the paternalism of much of corbynism grating - almost exclusively about food banks etc, this stuff matters but rhetoric shouldn't be limited to tops down stuff about helping the helpless poor, it should be about giving working class people the tools to take positive action, the stuff that is already available and taken for granted by others
It is but it is also somewhat at odds with her lack of criticism of the UC. Even a "better supported" UC would be (incredibly) paternalistic.Her point about the paternalism of labour's approach to welfare state is bang on tbf
strengthening unions? what else you thinking of?