Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

What constitution did the Iraqis really want?

Bernie Gunther

Fundamentalist Druid
Interesting article analysing the evolution of the Iraqi consititution.
Last June 30, the Iraqi Al-Mada newspaper published the latest draft of the Iraqi constitution that was then being negotiated upon by Iraqi politicians.1 Its contents would have been enough to give former occupation authority chief Paul Bremer a heart attack.

The Iraqis—even those who were willing to cooperate with the Americans—wanted, at least on paper, to build a Scandinavian-type welfare system in the Arabian desert, with Iraq’s vast oil wealth to be spent upholding every Iraqi’s right to education, health care, housing, and other social services. “Social justice is the basis of building society,” the draft declared. All of Iraq’s natural resources would be owned collectively by the Iraqi people. Everyone would have the right to work and the state would be legally bound to provide employment opportunities to everyone. The state will be the Iraqi people’s collective instrument for achieving development. (See key provisions in matrix below.)

In other words, the Iraqis wanted a country different from that which the Americans had come to Iraq for. They, or at least those who were involved in drafting the constitution, wanted nothing of the kind of economic and political system that Bremer and other U.S. officials had been attempting to create in Iraq ever since the occupation began. What the occupation authorities wanted was to fulfill “the wish-list of international investors,” as The Economist magazine had described the economic policies they began imposing in the country in 2003.2

As direct occupiers, the United States had enacted laws which give foreign investors equal rights as Iraqis in the domestic market; permit the full repatriation of profits; institute the flat tax system; abolish tariffs; enforce a strict intellectual property rights regime; sell off a whole range of state-owned companies; reduce food and fuel subsidies; and privatize all kinds of social services such as health, education, water delivery, etc.

By the time the next version was leaked in late July, the progressive provisions in the draft constitution had disappeared.
http://www.fpif.org/fpiftxt/492

Instead, the Iraqis are to have neo-liberal dogma shoved down their throats, while the US stands around holding guns.

No wonder they don't fancy it one bit.
 
It was bound to happen though wasnt it ?. The US only recognises US style democracy as being democracy. They didnt "liberate" Iraq for it to turn into Sweden. Thats not what Halliburton paid Cheneys wages for, at all.
 
Very interesting Bernie. Neoliberal economics, as is obvious to everybody now, when practiced in poor countries is a disaster. That's not to say state-led development is always better, but Iraq has a lot of very competent people and an enormous oil wealth, so it stood a lot better chance of being able to achieve it than, say, somewhere random in Africa. Doesn't look like it's going to get the chance anytime soon.
 
Back
Top Bottom